What to know
There are many ways to prevent Histoplasma exposure through elimination and engineering controls. Based on the hierarchy of controls, elimination is the most effective. In some cases where elimination is not possible, there are also engineering controls that can help. Review the strategies below.
Excluding bats or birds from a building
Work-related histoplasmosis often involves disruption of bird or bat droppings.1 The best way to prevent exposure to Histoplasma is to prevent bird or bat droppings from accumulating in the first place.
Moving bats from an occupied roost
To move bats away from an occupied roost in a building:23
- Identify and seal entry and exit points, even the smallest holes.A
- Install and maintain lights in the roosting area, forcing bats to seek another daytime roosting site.
- Construct bat houses near former roosts.B
Ultrasonic devices and chemical repellents are not effective for eliminating bats from a roosting area.4
Excluding birds
To exclude birds from a building:5
- Identify and seal entry and exit points.
- Consider visual deterrents (balloons, flags, lights, and replicas of hawks and owls) and noises.C
- Use nontoxic, chemical bird repellents like liquids, aerosols, and nondrying films.D
- Use mechanical anti-roosting systems consisting of angled and porcupine wires made of stainless steel.E
Controlling dust generation
Upon discovering a roosting site, make plans to restrict the area and determine the extent of contamination. When deciding about removing accumulations, consider factors like:
- The amount and location of the material.
- The structural integrity or soundness of the building or structure.
- Weather conditions.
- Whether people are nearby.
When to do nothing
Methods
If the material has to go, there are ways to eliminate or reduce dust generation to lower risk of infection.
Avoid shoveling or sweeping dry, dusty material. Instead, carefully spray it to reduce the amount of aerosolized material (or material dispersed or spread into the air).6 Adding a surfactant to the water might reduce further the amount of aerosolized material.F Once the material is wetted, it can be collected in a secure container for immediate disposal.
An alternative method is to use an industrial vacuum cleaner with a high-efficiency filter to collect potentially contaminated material. Truck-mounted or trailer-mounted vacuum systems are recommended for areas with large accumulations of bat or bird manure. See the personal protective equipment page for workers involved in these activities.
What to do next
In most cases, environmental sampling to confirm Histoplasma is no longer present after removal of droppings is unnecessary. However, visually inspect the cleaned area to ensure no residual dust or debris remains. After this, a removal activity may be considered finished.
Disinfecting potentially contaminated material
Disinfectants have occasionally been used to treat contaminated soil and accumulations of bat droppings. However, this occurred when removal was not practical or as a precaution before a removal process was started. However, there are no Environmental Protection Agency-approved products registered specifically as soil disinfectants or as being effective against Histoplasma. In past histoplasmosis outbreak settings, formaldehyde was used to decontaminate material contaminated with Histoplasma.789 This is not recommended because formaldehyde can cause a variety of health problems.10
Disposing of waste
Any material removed from a work site that might be contaminated with Histoplasma should be disposed of properly and safely. It should not be moved to another area where it could still be a health hazard.
State and local requirements for the removal, transportation, and disposal of potentially contaminated material should be followed. Some state or local landfill regulations define material contaminated with Histoplasma to be infectious waste. In that case, incineration or another disposal method may also be required. If disposing in a landfill, arrangements should be made with a landfill operator.
Controlling dust during construction
Even in the absence of large accumulations of bat and bird droppings, Histoplasma spores can be aerosolized during construction, excavation, or demolition. Once airborne, spores can be carried easily by wind currents over long distances. These spores could infect people outside of the work site. Regardless of location, take precautions to prevent dust in the air from active and inactive bird or bat roosts.11
In regions where Histoplasma is common, use water sprays or other dust suppression techniques should be used to reduce aerosolized dust during construction, excavation, or demolition.12 During windy periods or other times when typical dust suppression techniques are ineffective, earthmoving activities should be interrupted.
All earthmoving equipment (bulldozers, trucks, and front-end loaders) should have enclosed cabs with air-conditioning and HEPA filtration (if available) to protect their operators. Air filters on air-conditioners should be inspected on a regular schedule and cleaned or replaced as needed. During filter cleaning or replacement of exceptionally dusty air filters, maintenance workers should wear respiratory protection if there is a potential for the dust to be aerosolized. Truck beds carrying dirt or debris from a work site should be covered, and all trucks should pass through a wash station before leaving the site. When at a dump site, a truck operator should ensure that people in the vicinity will not be exposed to aerosolized dust while the truck is emptied.
- Some types of bats can squeeze through an opening as small as a dime.
- This is a common practice for the welfare of evicted bats and may also keep the bats from colonizing in nearby buildings.
- Visual and auditory deterrents may scare birds away but may not have long-lasting effects.
- Disadvantages of these materials are that some are messy, and none are permanent. Even the most effective ones require periodic reapplication.
- Mechanical anti-roosting systems may require some occasional maintenance to clear nesting material or other debris from the wires.
- Surfactants are also called wetting agents, like a detergent.
- Benedict K, Mody RK [2016]. Epidemiology of histoplasmosis outbreaks, United States, 1938-2013. Emerg Infect Dis 22(3):370–378.
- DePerno, CS [2020]. Animal Damage Control. In: 2020 N.C. Agricultural Chemicals Manual. North Carolina Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources.
- Bat Conservation International, Inc. [1996]. Exclusion experts promote pest control industry changes. Bats 14(2):10–11.
- Tuttle MD [2005]. America's neighborhood bats. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
- Williams DE, Corrigan RM [1994]. Pigeons (rock doves). In: Prevention and control of wildlife damage. [https://agri.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/agrinvgov/Content/Protection/Resource_Protection/Pigeon.pdf]
- Stobierski MG, Hospedales CJ, Hall WN, Robinson-Dunn B, Hoch D, Sheill DA [1996]. Outbreak of histoplasmosis among employees in a paper factory—Michigan, 1993. J Clin Microbiol 34(5):1220–1223.
- Bartlett PC, Vonbehren LA, Tewari RP, Martin RJ, Eagleton L, Isaac MJ, Kulkarni PS [1982]. Bats in the belfry: an outbreak of histoplasmosis. Am J Public Health 72:1369–1372.
- Bartlett PC, Weeks RJ, Ajello L [1982]. Decontamination of Histoplasma capsulatum-infested bird roost in Illinois. Arch Environ Health 37:221–223.
- Tosh FE, Weeks RJ, Pfeiffer FR, Hendricks SL, Greer DL, Chin TDY [1967]. The use of formalin to kill Histoplasma capsulatum at an epidemic site. Am J Epidemiol 85:259–265.
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [1999]. Toxicological profile for formaldehyde. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. [https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp111.pdf]. Date accessed: November 2020.
- Morse DL, Gordon MA, Matte T, Eadie G [1985]. An outbreak of histoplasmosis in a prison. Am J Epidemio 122(2):253–261.
- Huhn GD, Austin C, Carr M, Heyer D, Bourdeau P, Gilbert G, Eimen T, Lindsley MD, Cali S, Conover CS, Dworkin MS [2005]. "Two outbreaks of occupationally acquired histoplasmosis: more than workers at risk." 113(5): 585-589.