Notes from the Field: Respiratory Viral Panel as an Early Diagnostic Tool for Neonatal Enterovirus Infection — San Diego, California 2023

Ryan Sanchez, MD1,2; Errica Capossela, DO1,2; Mark Speziale, MD, PhD1,2; Jane O’Donnell, MD1,2; Amaran Moodley, MD2,3; Christina Morales, PhD4; Debra A. Wadford, PhD4; Carol Glaser, MD, DVM5; Seema Shah, MD6; Mark E. Beatty, MD6; Alice Pong, MD2,3 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Enterovirus infections can cause severe disease in neonates.

What is added by this report?

In 2023, a cluster of neonatal enterovirus infections initially suspected to be echovirus 11, but subsequently identified as Coxsackie B4 and B5 infections, occurred in San Diego, California. Respiratory panel polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for rhinovirus-enterovirus facilitated diagnosis of enterovirus infection in these infants.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Coxsackie virus as well as echovirus can cause severe disease in neonates. Respiratory virus panel PCR testing in neonates can be a useful diagnostic tool for enterovirus sepsis evaluations.

Article Metrics
Altmetric:

Related Materials

Enterovirus infections in neonates can result in high morbidity and mortality. In 2023, a cluster of neonatal enterovirus cases associated with Coxsackie B4 and B5 occurred in San Diego, California.

Investigation and Outcomes

During June–October 2023, five cases of neonatal enterovirus infection were identified at Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego, California. The authors were granted a waiver of individual authorization for use of protected health information by the University of California San Diego Institutional Review Board. All five cases were initially suspected to be caused by enterovirus based on characteristic clinical presentations during enterovirus seasons and supported by positive rhinovirus-enterovirus (RhV-EV) results from respiratory virus panel (RVP) testing of nasopharyngeal specimens, performed within 1 day of symptom onset. Reports of severe neonatal enterovirus disease from Europe linked to a new variant of echovirus 11 caused concern (1). Four of the five patients’ plasma also tested positive for enterovirus by reverse transcription−polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results of RT-PCR testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for enterovirus were positive for two patients. Four infants had thrombocytopenia, and three had hepatitis with coagulopathy. Serum ferritin levels were elevated in three neonates. One neonate experienced seizures as the initial sign and subsequently developed pancytopenia with suspected, but unconfirmed, viral-induced hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. The most severely affected patient, an infant aged 5 days, whose mother experienced a febrile illness during delivery diagnosed as chorioamnionitis, developed multiorgan failure. The infant received multiple immune globulin intravenous (IGIV) doses, the investigational antiviral drug pocapavir* (2), and maternal convalescent plasma; however, the infant did not survive. Four of the five infants received IGIV therapy. Mothers of three of the infants received a diagnosis of chorioamnionitis before delivery, and the mother of the remaining two infants (twins) was reportedly evaluated for postpartum fever and received a diagnosis of endometritis.

Blood, CSF, and respiratory specimens were sent to the California Department of Public Health Center for Laboratory Sciences Viral and Rickettsial Disease Laboratory for virus identification, in coordination with the County of San Diego. Coxsackie B5 was identified in three specimens and Coxsackie B4 in one. Plasma from the fifth patient tested positive for enterovirus by RT-PCR; however, the viral copy number was too low for further identification (Table).

Preliminary Conclusions and Actions

Enterovirus infection can be life-threatening in the early neonatal period. At the time of this cluster, countries in Europe were reporting echovirus 11 infection in neonates (1). Coxsackie B4 and B5, but not echovirus 11, were identified among the patients described in this report. In a review of clinical characteristics of severe neonatal enterovirus infections during 2000–2020 (3), in cases where virus serotype was known, 82.7% of cases resulted from Coxsackie B viruses and 16.7% from echoviruses. Data from the U.S. National Enterovirus Surveillance System (4) showed that Coxsackie B viruses and echoviruses were also the most common groups of enteroviruses reported among U.S. neonates.

Maternal illness is reported in association with neonatal enterovirus infection and is a likely source of infection for infants with early illness (3,5). Details of maternal symptoms in this cluster of patients were not available for review; however, symptoms attributed to chorioamnionitis and endometritis might also have been due to maternal enterovirus infection.

Detection of rhinovirus-enterovirus among the five patients at illness onset, despite absence of upper respiratory tract symptoms, led to high suspicion of enterovirus and thus a targeted neonatal sepsis workup. Timely RVP testing is not always performed for neonates. If rapid on-site enterovirus-specific RT-PCR testing is not available, including nasopharyngeal RVP testing as part of the neonatal sepsis workup, particularly during summer and fall, could facilitate diagnosis of neonatal enterovirus infection. Timely identification facilitates optimal clinical management for the infant, which might include receipt of IGIV and possibly antiviral medication.

Acknowledgments

Alice Chen, April Hatada, Chao-Yang Pan, Maria Salas, Viral and Rickettsial Disease Laboratory, California Department of Public Health.

Corresponding author: Alice Pong, apong@rchsd.org.


1Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; 2Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego, San Diego, California; 3Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; 4Viral and Rickettsial Disease Laboratory, Center for Laboratory Sciences, California Department of Public Health; 5Center for Laboratory Sciences, California Department of Public Health; 6County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency, San Diego, California.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.


* Pocapavir was obtained through ViroDefense, Inc. and the Food and Drug Administration expanded access program.

https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jcm.00542-06

References

  1. Grapin M, Mirand A, Pinquier D, et al. Severe and fatal neonatal infections linked to a new variant of echovirus 11, France, July 2022 to April 2023. Euro Surveill 2023;28:2300253. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.22.2300253 PMID:37261730
  2. Torres-Torres S, Myers AL, Klatte JM, et al. First use of investigational antiviral drug pocapavir (v-073) for treating neonatal enteroviral sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2015;34:52–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000000497 PMID:25229269
  3. Zhang M, Wang H, Tang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of severe neonatal enterovirus infection: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 2021;21:127. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000000497 PMID:25229269
  4. Khetsuriani N, Lamonte A, Oberste MS, Pallansch M. Neonatal enterovirus infections reported to the national enterovirus surveillance system in the United States, 1983–2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:889–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000237798.07462.32 PMID:17006282
  5. Lin TY, Kao HT, Hsieh SH, et al. Neonatal enterovirus infections: emphasis on risk factors of severe and fatal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22:889–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000091294.63706.f3 PMID:14551490
TABLE. Pertinent laboratory values* and clinical features of neonatal patients with enterovirus infection — San Diego, California, 2023Return to your place in the text
Characteristic Patient
A B C D E
Sex Male Male Female Male Female
Age at symptom onset, days 9 6 5 6 5
Gestational age, wks 36 36 38 40 35
Initial symptoms Respiratory distress and poor feeding Poor feeding and seizures Poor feeding Fever and respiratory distress Poor feeding and decreased tone
AST / ALT (U/L) 104 / 17 970 / 367§ 1,608 / 318§ 69 / 26 4,215 / 564
Ferritin (ng/mL) Not done 112,984§ 98,999§ Not done >100,000
Platelet count (× 1,000/μL) 64§ 6§ 20§ 227 8
PT / INR ratio Not done 33.6 / 3.1§ 18.9 / 1.5§ Not done 60.3 / 5.3
Antiviral therapy None IGIV IGIV IGIV IGIV, pocapavir, MCP
Outcome Survived Survived, seizures Survived Survived Deceased
EV type identified Coxsackie B5 Coxsackie B5 Coxsackie B4 Copy number too low for detection Coxsackie B5

Abbreviations: ALT = alanine transaminase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; EV = enterovirus; IGIV = immunoglobulin intravenous; INR = international normalized ratio; MCP = maternal convalescent plasma; PT = prothrombin time.
* The most abnormal values identified for each category are presented; laboratory testing for patients A, D, and E was performed at different hospitals.
Reference values: AST = 17–184 U/L; ALT not established for age ≤28 days; platelet count = 150,000–450,000/μL.
§ Reference values: AST = 32–162 U/L; ALT = 5–33 U/L; ferritin = 100–717 ng/mL (age 0−14 days), 14–647 ng/mL (age 15 days−6 months); platelet count = 140,000–440,000/μL; PT = 12.3–15.3 sec; INR = 0.86–1.14.
Reference values: AST = 0–32 U/L; ALT = 0–33 U/L; ferritin = 150–973 ng/mL; platelet count = 220,000–450,000/μL (age 0−7 days), 230,000-600,000/µl (age 8 days−6 months); PT = 9.7–12.5 sec; INR = no reference values for patients not receiving anticoagulation therapy.


Suggested citation for this article: Sanchez R, Capossela E, Speziale M, et al. Notes from the Field: Respiratory Viral Panel as an Early Diagnostic Tool for Neonatal Enterovirus Infection — San Diego, California 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024;73:607–608. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7327a2.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.