PCD logo

Trajectory of Multiple Chronic Conditions and Associated Factors Among Noninstitutionalized Adults Aged 60 Years or Older in Southern Brazil

PEER REVIEWED


Figure.

Trajectories of chronic conditions according to the number of conditions among participants in the Como Vai? study, Pelotas, Brazil. Of 1,098 study participants, 339 (30.9%) were categorized as having a low burden of chronic conditions, 571 (52.0%) moderate, and 188 (17.1%) high.

Figure. Trajectories of chronic conditions according to the number of conditions among participants in the Como Vai? study, Pelotas, Brazil. Of 1,098 study participants, 339 (30.9%) were categorized as having a low burden of chronic conditions, 571 (52.0%) moderate, and 188 (17.1%) high.
Level Mean (range) no. of chronic conditions, by year
2014 2016 2019
Low (n = 339) 2.3 (0–6) 2.2 (0–6) 2.6 (0–7)
Moderate (n = 571) 5.6 (0–11) 5.7 (1–10) 5.7 (1–13)
High (n = 188) 9.7 (3–16) 10.2 (5–16) 9.6 (5–17)

Return to Article

Figure. Results of an attrition analysis comparing the average number of chronic conditions, by year, across trajectories of disease burden among participants with information at all 3 time points in the Como Vai? study, Pelotas, Brazil. Of 440 study participants, 117 (26.6%) were categorized as having a low burden of chronic conditions, 254 (57.7%) moderate, and 69 (15.7%) high.

Results of an attrition analysis comparing the average number of chronic conditions, by year, across trajectories of disease burden among participants with information at all 3 time points in the Como Vai? study, Pelotas, Brazil. Of 440 study participants, 117 (26.6%) were categorized as having a low burden of chronic conditions, 254 (57.7%) moderate, and 69 (15.7%) high.
Level Mean (range) no. of chronic conditions, by year
2014 2016 2019
Low burden (n = 117) 2.2 (0–5) 1.9 (0–4) 2.4 (0–7)
Moderate burden (n = 254 ) 5.3 (2–10) 5.3 (1–10) 5.5 (1–13)
High burden (n = 69) 9.5 (5–16) 9.8 (7–16) 9.8 (5–17)

Return to Article

Top

Error processing SSI file

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.