Polypharmacy and Health-Related Quality of Life Among US Adults With Arthritis, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2010–2012

Abdulkarim M. Meraya, MS; Nilanjana Dwibedi, PhD; Usha Sambamoorthi, PhD

Suggested citation for this article: Meraya AM, Dwibedi N, Sambamoorthi U. Polypharmacy and Health-Related Quality of Life Among US Adults With Arthritis, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2010–2012. Prev Chronic Dis 2016;13:160092. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160092external icon.

PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction

Our objective was to determine the relationship between polypharmacy (treatment with prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among US adults with arthritis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study that used 2-year longitudinal data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to analyze a cohort of 6,132 adults aged over 21 years with arthritis. Measures of HRQoL were the summary scores from the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) of the 12-item short-form health survey. Unadjusted and adjusted regression models were used to evaluate the association between polypharmacy and HRQoL measures. We used SAS, version 9.4, (SAS Institute Inc) to conduct all analyses.

Results

In unadjusted analyses, adults with arthritis taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently had significantly lower MCS and PCS scores (β, −3.11, P < .001 and β, −10.26, P < .001, respectively) than adults taking prescription drugs from fewer than 6. After controlling for the demographic characteristics, number of mental and physical chronic conditions, and baseline MCS and PCS scores, adults taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently had significantly lower PCS scores (β, −1.68, P < .001), than those taking prescription drugs from fewer than 6. However, no significant difference in MCS scores was found between adults taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently and those taking prescription drugs from fewer than 6 (β, −0.27, P = .46).

Conclusion

Polypharmacy is significantly associated with lower PCS scores among adults with arthritis. Because polypharmacy can lead to drug–drug and drug–disease interactions, health care providers need to consider the risk and adopt a cautious approach in prescribing multiple drugs to manage chronic conditions and in choosing therapies to improve HRQoL among adults with arthritis.

Top

Introduction

Arthritis is one of the most prevalent diseases among adults in the United States (1–3) and is the leading cause of adult disability (3,4). Nearly 52.5 million adults reported having some form of arthritis from 2010 through 2012 (2). Arthritis has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (5–8). Adults with arthritis have worse HRQoL than those without arthritis (7,8). Arthritis is a greater detriment to HRQoL than other common chronic conditions, such as lung disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, and ischemic heart disease (9). Results from previous clinical trials indicated that pharmacologic treatment of arthritis improved HRQoL among adults with arthritis (5,10,11).

Arthritis-related pharmacotherapy can include multiple drug regimens, including analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, or biological therapies (12,13). Adults with arthritis may have multiple co-existing conditions (2,14) that could be treated with medication. For example, if a woman with osteoarthritis has 4 other chronic conditions (eg, diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis), she could be prescribed 12 separate medications based on clinical guidelines (15). Some adults with arthritis may be on multiple arthritis-related medications, and if co-existing conditions are also treated with drugs, these adults may be treated with polypharmacy (treatment with prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently).

High rates of polypharmacy have been documented among adults with arthritis (12,13,16). In addition, polypharmacy is often associated with low HRQoL (17–19). Although the association between arthritis and polypharmacy was documented (12,13,16), no study to date has examined the effect of polypharmacy on HRQoL among US adults with arthritis. Therefore, the objective of our study was to assess the relationship between polypharmacy and HRQoL measures among US adults with arthritis.

Top

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal retrospective cohort study with a baseline year and follow-up year by using data from 2 longitudinal panels of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). MEPS is an annual household survey of noninstitutionalized civilians (20). Interviews were conducted 5 times over the course of 2 years to minimize recall bias, providing longitudinal data (20). Computer-assisted personal interviewing technology was used to collect information on each household member. We combined data from 2 panels, panel 15 (2010–2011) and panel 16 (2011–2012) to increase sample size.

We used information provided by the households to identify medical conditions, prescription drugs used, HRQoL measures, health status, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, employment status, and access to care (20). Chronic conditions were elicited by asking respondents to enumerate the 1) conditions in the MEPS priority list; 2) conditions leading to emergency, outpatient, inpatient, and other hospital visits; 3) conditions causing disability; and 4) conditions that bothered the respondents during a reference period (20). The study cohort consisted of adults aged over 21 years who were alive and had arthritis during the baseline year. Arthritis was identified from household or medical conditions files of MEPS. We identified adults with arthritis as those who reported having arthritis in the household file or were linked to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 201, 202, 203, or 204 in the medical conditions file.

Measures

Outcome was assessed by HRQoL by using the 12-item short form (SF-12) health survey (21). The short form measures 8 domains: general health, vitality, physical functioning, role–physical (limitations in work and daily activities because of physical problems), bodily pain, social functioning, role–emotional (limitations in work and daily activities because of emotional problems), and mental health (11,22). MEPS provides information on mental component summary (MCS) scores and physical component summary (PCS) scores. We used MCS and PCS scores to represent mental and physical health components of HRQoL. MCS and PCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better self-reported health and better HRQoL (11,22). The mean score of the general US population is 50 (22). The established MCS norms for the national sample of people with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis are 47.53 and 47.15, respectively, whereas the established PCS norm for people with osteoarthritis is 38.91 and for those with rheumatoid arthritis is 40.57 (22).

Polypharmacy was the key explanatory variable assessed. There is no consensus definition of polypharmacy; however, taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently was a widely used definition in previous studies (23). Thus, we categorized the adults in our cohort by whether, during the baseline year, they were taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently or taking prescription drugs from fewer than 6 drug classes concurrently. The MEPS prescription medications file provides information on therapeutic classes of medications through linkage with the Multum Lexicon database (http://www.multum.com/Lexicon.htm) (24). We used the unique therapeutic class codes from this database to identify the maximum number of classes of medications taken by people in the baseline year.

Other explanatory variables measured during the baseline year were sex (female, male); age (22–39 y, 40–49 y, 50–64 y, 65–74 y, ≥75 y); race/ethnicity (white, African American, Latino, or other); marital status (married, separated/divorced, widowed, or never married); poverty status based on the household’s annual income as a percentage of the federal poverty line (poor, <100%; near poor, 100% to <200%; middle income, 200% to <400%; high income, ≥400%); health insurance coverage (private, public, uninsured); prescription drug coverage (yes or no); the presence of other co-occurring physical conditions (asthma, diabetes, cancer, gastroesophageal reflux disease, heart disease, hypertension, osteoporosis, thyroid, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and mental conditions (depression, anxiety); baseline HRQoL measures; smoking status (current smoker or not current smoker; body mass index (BMI) (kg/m²) (underweight/normal [≤24.9], overweight [25.0−29.9], or obese [≥30.0]); and geographic area of residence (metropolitan or rural).

We controlled for baseline PCS in the models because a study by Fortin and colleagues suggested that lower PCS scores were associated with severity of illness for many of the chronic conditions they examined from a list of 14 anatomical domains (eg, cardiac, respiratory, renal, metabolic) (25).

Statistical analysis

We used χ² to examine the associations between polypharmacy and other explanatory variables in the bivariate analysis. The relationship between polypharmacy and HRQoL measures (MCS and PCS) was assessed by using t tests.

Because of the nature of the outcome, multivariable ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions were used to examine the association between polypharmacy and follow-up HRQoL measures (MCS and PCS) separately.

We constructed unadjusted and adjusted models with these as explanatory variables: number of co-existing chronic physical and mental conditions, baseline MCS and PCS scores, sex, age, race/ethnicity, marital status, poverty status, health insurance coverage, prescription drug coverage, BMI, smoking status, and geographic area of residence. In all models, the reference group was “no polypharmacy.”

All analyses accounted for the complex survey design of MEPS, and statistical testing was carried out with survey procedures in SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc). Because of multiple comparisons, we reported all P values, and we considered variables with a P value of less than .05 to be significant.

Top

Results

In the combined MEPS panels, 6,132 adults had data for the baseline year and were alive during the follow-up year. We found polypharmacy among 28% of our cohort; nearly 70% of our cohort had at least 1 additional chronic physical condition. Adults with 5 or more chronic physical conditions had the highest rate of polypharmacy (89.1%). Those with 3 or 4 chronic physical conditions had a significantly higher rate of polypharmacy than those with 1 or 2 chronic physical conditions (63.2% vs 24.3%). Among adults with depression or anxiety, 45.3% took 6 or more prescription medications compared with 25.5% of adults without depression or anxiety. Adults with prescription drug coverage had significantly higher rates of polypharmacy than those without prescription drug coverage (35.9% vs 1.7%). Significant associations were found between polypharmacy and all the explanatory variables included in the study (Table 1).

HRQoL measures by polypharmacy

The mean MCS scores for the cohort during the baseline year and follow-up years were 49.35 (SE, 0.17) and 49.57 (SE, 0.18), respectively. The mean PCS scores for the cohort during the baseline and follow-up years were 42.61 (SE, 0.19) and 42.39 (SE, 0.19), respectively (Table 2). The mean MCS and PCS scores by polypharmacy during the baseline and follow-up years are listed in Table 2.

Table 3 displays parameter estimates of polypharmacy from each OLS regression using MCS and PCS scores as outcomes. In the unadjusted model, adults taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently had significantly lower MCS scores (β, −3.11; P < .001) and PCS scores (β, −10.26; P < .001) than those taking prescription drugs from fewer than 6.

After controlling for sex, age, race/ethnicity, marital status, poverty status, health insurance coverage, prescription drug coverage, number of mental and physical health conditions, BMI, smoking status, geographic area of residence, and baseline MCS and PCS scores, adults taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently had significantly lower PCS scores (β, −1.68; P < .001) than those taking prescription drugs from fewer than 6. However, no significant difference in MCS scores was found between adults taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently and those taking prescription drugs from fewer than 6 (β, −0.27, P = .46).

Sensitivity analyses

We conducted 2 sensitivity analyses that used different definitions of polypharmacy to test the robustness of the results. In the first sensitivity analysis, we defined polypharmacy as using prescription drugs from 4 or more drug classes concurrently. In the second sensitivity analysis, we defined polypharmacy as using drugs from 5 or more drug classes. In both analyses, the negative associations between polypharmacy and PCS scores remained significant and consistent with the primary analyses.

With polypharmacy defined as taking prescription drugs from 4 or more drug classes concurrently, the unadjusted analyses indicated negative associations between polypharmacy and MCS (β, −2.72; P < .001) and PCS (β, −9.50; P < .001) scores. In the adjusted model, adults taking prescription drugs from 4 or more drug classes concurrently had significantly lower PCS scores than those taking prescription drugs from fewer drug classes (β, −1.71; P < .001). However, we found no difference in MCS scores between adults taking prescription drugs from 4 or more drug classes concurrently and those taking prescription drugs from fewer drug classes (β, −0.31; P = .37).

With polypharmacy defined as taking prescription drugs from 5 or more drug classes concurrently, unadjusted models indicated negative associations between polypharmacy and MCS (β, −3.00; P < .001) and PCS scores (β, −9.85; P < .001). In the adjusted model, adults taking prescription drugs from 5 or more drug classes concurrently had significantly lower PCS scores than those taking prescription drugs from fewer drug classes (β, −1.87; P < .001). We found no difference in MCS scores (β, −0.31; P = .39).

Top

Discussion

Our study examined the relationship between polypharmacy and HRQoL among adults with arthritis. Among our cohort of US adults with arthritis, 28% were found to be taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently. The average PCS scores for these adults were below the established PCS norms for people with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting that adults in our cohort had poorer health than the general US population with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. We also found that more adults taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently had 3 or more chronic physical conditions compared with those taking prescription drugs from fewer drug classes. After controlling for other explanatory variables, adults taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently had significantly lower PCS scores than those taking prescription drugs from fewer drug classes.

Our results suggest that polypharmacy is negatively associated with PCS scores among adults with arthritis. Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies showing that polypharmacy is associated with low PCS scores among older American Indians (18), rural elderly (19), and male veterans (17).

Nearly 70% of the adults in our cohort had 1 or more chronic physical conditions in addition to arthritis. The management of arthritis often requires multiple prescription medications, including analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, or biological therapies (12,13); co-existing conditions may need to be treated with drugs, placing adults with arthritis at high risk for polypharmacy. Polypharmacy is associated with drug–drug and drug–disease interactions that may lead to development of new diseases or worsen control of existing diseases. Therefore, health care providers need to weigh the harms and benefits before prescribing multiple drugs for the management of arthritis and other co-occurring conditions. In addition, further investigation of the impact of the different drug classes on the PCS measure is needed. Identifying the drug classes that are associated with lower PCS scores was beyond the scope of this study.

In the adjusted analyses, we found no differences in the MCS scores between adults taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently and those taking prescription drugs from fewer drug classes. This is consistent with the results of a previous study showing that polypharmacy is not associated with MCS scores among older American Indians (18). Nevertheless, the average MCS scores for adults in our study cohort were above the established MCS norms for people with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (22).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that assesses the relationship between polypharmacy and HRQoL measures among adults with arthritis by using a nationally representative data set and well-established and validated measures of HRQoL. We controlled for a comprehensive list of factors that may affect HRQoL. Availability of information on prescription drug classes enabled us to measure polypharmacy. However, this study had limitations. First, information on all the variables was based on self-reported data, which increases the risk for recall bias. Second, we could not control for the severity of arthritis in the baseline year. Third, MEPS does not provide information on nonprescription drugs, such as analgesics and anti-inflammatories. Finally, we did not explicitly control for arthritis-related treatment that may affect HRQoL.

Polypharmacy is significantly associated with lower PCS scores among adults with arthritis. Further research is required to identify the drug classes associated with low PCS scores. Because polypharmacy can lead to drug–drug and drug–disease interactions, health care providers should assess risk and adopt a cautious approach in prescribing multiple drugs to manage chronic conditions and should choose therapies that improve HRQoL among adults with arthritis.

Top

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Traci J. LeMasters for her contributions in revising some parts of the final drafts. This project was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, U54GM104942. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Top

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Abdulkarim M. Meraya, MS, Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, PO Box 9510, Morgantown, WV 26506. Telephone: 304-293-1442. Email: ammeraya@mix.wvu.edu.

Author Affiliations: Nilanjana Dwibedi, Usha Sambamoorthi, Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Top

References

1. Arthritis: at a glance; 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/aag/arthritis.htm. Accessed February 13, 2016.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation — United States, 2010–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62(44):869–73. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6244a1.htm.
3. Ward BW, Schiller JS, Goodman RA. Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:E62. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2014/13_0389.htm. Accessed February 13, 2016. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
4. Ford ES, Croft JB, Posner SF, Goodman RA, Giles WH. Co-occurrence of leading lifestyle-related chronic conditions among adults in the United States, 2002–2009. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:E60. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2013/12_0316.htm. Accessed February 13, 2016. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
5. Kosinski M, Kujawski SC, Martin R, Wanke LA, Buatti MC, Ware JE Jr, et al. Health-related quality of life in early rheumatoid arthritis: impact of disease and treatment response. Am J Manag Care 2002;8(3):231–40. PubMedexternal icon
6. Mili F, Helmick CG, Moriarty DG. Health related quality of life among adults reporting arthritis: analysis of data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, US, 1996–99. J Rheumatol 2003;30(1):160–6. PubMedexternal icon
7. Dominick KL, Ahern FM, Gold CH, Heller DA. Health-related quality of life among older adults with arthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2(5):5. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
8. Furner SE, Hootman JM, Helmick CG, Bolen J, Zack MM. Health-related quality of life of US adults with arthritis: analysis of data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2003, 2005, and 2007. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(6):788–99. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
9. Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, Mosconi P, et al. . Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res 2004;13(2):283–98. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
10. Tugwell P, Wells G, Strand V, Maetzel A, Bombardier C, Crawford B, et al. . Clinical improvement as reflected in measures of function and health-related quality of life following treatment with leflunomide compared with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: sensitivity and relative efficiency to detect a treatment effect in a twelve-month, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43(3):506–14. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
11. Strand V, Sharp V, Koenig AS, Park G, Shi Y, Wang B, et al. Comparison of health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and psoriasis and effects of etanercept treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71(7):1143–50. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
12. Treharne GJ, Douglas KM, Iwaszko J, Panoulas VF, Hale ED, Mitton DL, et al. Polypharmacy among people with rheumatoid arthritis: the role of age, disease duration and comorbidity. Musculoskeletal Care 2007;5(4):175–90.
13. Wallace JL. Polypharmacy of osteoarthritis: the perfect intestinal storm. Dig Dis Sci 2013;58(11):3088–93. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
14. Suri P, Morgenroth DC, Hunter DJ. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis and associated comorbidities. PM R 2012;4(5, Suppl):S10–9. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
15. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA 2005;294(6):716–24. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
16. Vyas A, Pan X, Sambamoorthi U. Chronic condition clusters and polypharmacy among adults. Int J Family Med 2012;2012:193168. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
17. Fincke BG, Miller DR, Spiro A 3d. The interaction of patient perception of overmedication with drug compliance and side effects. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13(3):182–5. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
18. Henderson JA, Buchwald D, Manson SM. Relationship of medication use to health-related quality of life among a group of older American Indians. J Appl Gerontol 2006;25(1):89S–104S. CrossRefexternal icon
19. Clearya KK, Howell DM. Prescription medication use and health-related quality of life in rural elderly. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2007;26(2):63–81. CrossRefexternal icon
20. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, HC-138: 2010 Full Year Consolidated Data File; 2012. https://meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h138/h138doc.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2016.
21. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, HC-147: 2011 Full Year Consolidated Data File; 2013. https://meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h147/h147doc.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2016.
22. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SDA. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34(3):220–33. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
23. Bushardt RL, Massey EB, Simpson TW, Ariail JC, Simpson KN. Polypharmacy: misleading, but manageable. Clin Interv Aging 2008;3(2):383–9. PubMedexternal icon
24. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, HC-135A: 2010 Prescribed Medicines; 2012. https://meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h135a/h135adoc.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2016.
25. Fortin M, Dubois MF, Hudon C, Soubhi H, Almirall J. Multimorbidity and quality of life: a closer look. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5(52).

Top

Tables

Table 1. Characteristics of the Study Sample of Adults with Arthritis (N = 6,132), by Polypharmacy, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Panels 2010–2012^a

Abbreviation: —, not applicable.
^a Polypharmacy was defined as taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently. Data were combined from 2 MEPS panels, 2010–2011 and 2011–2012, for adults aged over 21 years who reported having arthritis during the baseline year and were alive throughout the baseline and following year.
^b P values were derived from ?² tests between polypharmacy groups and explanatory variables.
^c Infective arthritis and osteomyelitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, [ICD-9] code 201), other nontraumatic joint disorders (ICD-9 code 204), or reported unspecified arthritis.
^d Poverty status was based on annual family income in relation to the federal poverty line. Participants were divided into 4 groups on the basis of their income’s percentage of the federal poverty line: poor (less than 100%), near poor (100% to <200%), middle income (200% to <400%), and high income (=400%)
^e Asthma, diabetes, cancer, gastroesophageal reflux disease, heart disease, hypertension, osteoporosis, thyroid disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
^f Anxiety or depression.

Table 2. Health-Related Quality of Life Measures During Baseline and Follow-up Year, by Polypharmacy^a, Adults (N = 6,132) With Arthritis, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Panels 2010–2012^b

Abbreviation —, not applicable.
^a Polypharmacy was defined as taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently. Number in the polypharmacy group was 1,696; for the no polypharmacy group, the number was 4,436.
^b Adults aged over 21 years who reported having arthritis during the baseline year and were alive throughout the baseline and following year.

Table 3. Parameter Estimates of Polypharmacy^a From Ordinary Least Squares Regression Outcomes Relative to Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score, Adults with Arthritis (N = 6,132)^b, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Panels 2010–2012

Abbreviation: SE, standard error.
^a Polypharmacy was defined as taking prescription drugs from 6 or more drug classes concurrently.
^b Adults aged over 21 years who reported having arthritis during the baseline year and were alive throughout the baseline and following year. Adjusted model included sex, age, race/ethnicity, marital status, poverty status, health insurance coverage, prescription drug coverage, number of mental and physical health conditions, body mass index (kg/m²), smoking status, geographic area of residence, and baseline MCS and PCS scores.

Top