Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 6—June 2024
Research Letter

Foodborne Disease Outbreaks Linked to Foods Eligible for Irradiation, United States, 2009–2020

Author affiliations: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA (M. Zlotnick); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M. Zlotnick, T. Eisenstein, M.P. Robyn, K.E. Marshall)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Food irradiation can reduce foodborne illnesses but is rarely used in the United States. We determined whether outbreaks related to Campylobacter, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes were linked to irradiation-eligible foods. Of 482 outbreaks, 155 (32.2%) were linked to an irradiation-eligible food, none of which were known to be irradiated.

Food irradiation has been studied globally for decades and is a safe, effective means of reducing foodborne illness–causing pathogens, sterilizing insects, delaying ripening or sprouting, and extending shelf life (1,2). The US Food and Drug Administration has approved various foods for irradiation, including meat, poultry, fresh shell eggs, and spices (2) (Appendix Table). However, irradiation has not been widely adopted in the United States because of large fixed costs and the perception of consumer unwillingness to purchase irradiated food (3). Estimates of the amount of irradiated food available in the United States are scarce, but as of 2010, approximately one third of spices consumed and <0.1% of imported fruit, vegetables, and meats were irradiated (3).

Campylobacter, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes are among the most common bacterial foodborne pathogens causing illnesses, hospitalizations, and death in the United States (4) and can be neutralized by irradiation at sufficient doses (5). We identified outbreaks caused by these pathogens and linked to irradiation-eligible foods; then, we determined whether any of the foods had been irradiated.

In the United States, the Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System (FDOSS) collects information from state, local, and territorial health departments about foodborne disease outbreaks. The National Outbreak Reporting System, launched in 2009, reports information gathered by FDOSS, including food processing methods such as shredding, pasteurizing, or irradiation. We searched for foodborne disease outbreaks reported and finalized through FDOSS and the National Outbreak Reporting System as of February 4, 2022, for which the date of first illness onset occurred during 2009–2020 and a confirmed pathogen was Campylobacter, Salmonella, E. coli, or Listeria monocytogenes. A foodborne disease outbreak was defined as >2 illnesses linked to a common exposure with evidence suggesting a food source. FDOSS variables we examined included method of processing, food vehicle, Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC) food category, and the number of estimated primary illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths. We grouped outbreaks by IFSAC category and irradiation approval status (eligible, some foods eligible, not yet eligible, or undetermined) (Appendix Table). We conducted a literature review to identify outbreaks not captured through FDOSS. We obtained foods approved for irradiation for pathogen reduction and approval years from the Code of Federal Regulations 21 Part 179 (Appendix Table).

In FDOSS, we identified 2,153 foodborne outbreaks during 2009–2020 caused by Campylobacter, Salmonella, E. coli, or Listeria monocytogenes. Of those, 482 (22.4%) included information regarding processing methods other than unknown or a missing value; none had irradiation listed as a processing method. Of the 482 outbreaks, 155 (32.2%) were linked to a food eligible for irradiation when the onset of the first reported illness occurred; those outbreaks resulted in 3,512 illnesses, 463 hospitalizations, and 10 deaths (Appendix Table). The most common sources were chicken (52 outbreaks), beef (31), and eggs (29), comprising 72% (112/155) of outbreaks linked to irradiation-eligible foods.

During our literature search, we identified 1 outbreak linked to food that might have included an irradiated ingredient. During 2009–2010, Salmonella enterica serotype Montevideo was found in imported pepper used in ready-to-eat salami (6). Some of the manufacturer’s pepper was reportedly irradiated, but some was not. Whether the implicated product contained irradiated pepper is unclear. Irradiation was not reported as a processing method for the outbreak in FDOSS. After consultation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention outbreak investigation team, we determined there was insufficient evidence to link that outbreak to irradiated pepper.

The illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths associated with outbreaks linked to irradiation-eligible foods might have been prevented or reduced had these foods been irradiated. Irradiation has repeatedly been proposed as a strategy to reduce foodborne disease outbreaks (5,7,8). Irradiation typically eliminates a large proportion of pathogenic microorganisms. The efficacy of irradiation depends on factors like temperature and water content (9). Food may become contaminated after irradiation. Irradiation can be a useful tool in improving food safety complementary to existing food safety practices. Consumer demand for irradiated foods may be increased through education (10).

The first limitation of our study is that IFSAC food categories do not always correspond to food groups approved for irradiation by the US Food and Drug Administration (Appendix Table); therefore, misclassification of irradiation approval status might have occurred for some foods. Reporting of outbreaks to FDOSS is voluntary, and processing method information was frequently missing, so irradiation might have been underreported or unrecognized by public health partners because of limited knowledge of irradiation or unfamiliarity with labeling. For outbreaks with multiple etiologies including a pathogen other than the 4 of interest, irradiation might not have reduced those pathogens.

We identified 155 Campylobacter, Salmonella, E. coli, or Listeria monocytogenes outbreaks with a known method of processing that were linked to irradiation-eligible foods during 2009–2020; none of the implicated foods were reported as irradiated. These results suggest that some outbreaks could be prevented or mitigated through irradiation. Prioritizing food irradiation efforts, particularly for chicken, beef, and eggs, could substantially reduce outbreaks and illnesses.

Dr. Zlotnick is an Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Fellow at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. Her work focuses on the prevention of zoonotic disease originating in food or animal contact.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Michelle Canning, Laura Gieraltowski, Lane Highbarger, and Jacqueline Roshelli Baker for their assistance.

This project was supported in part by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the US Department of Energy and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Top

References

  1. High-dose irradiation: wholesomeness of food irradiated with doses above 10 kGy. Report of a Joint FAO/IAEA/WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1999;890:ivi, 1–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Food and Drug Administration. Food irradiation: what you need to know. 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 23]. https://www.fda.gov/food/buy-store-serve-safe-food/food-irradiation-what-you-need-know
  3. Ferrier  P. Irradiation of produce imports: small inroads, big obstacles. 2011 [cited 2022 June 27]. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2011/june/irradiation-of-produce-imports
  4. Scallan  E, Hoekstra  RM, Angulo  FJ, Tauxe  RV, Widdowson  MA, Roy  SL, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:715. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tauxe  RV. Food safety and irradiation: protecting the public from foodborne infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(Suppl):51621. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gieraltowski  L, Julian  E, Pringle  J, Macdonald  K, Quilliam  D, Marsden-Haug  N, et al. Nationwide outbreak of Salmonella Montevideo infections associated with contaminated imported black and red pepper: warehouse membership cards provide critical clues to identify the source. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141:124452. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Osterholm  MT, Norgan  AP. The role of irradiation in food safety. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1898901. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gunther  NW IV, Abdul-Wakeel  A, Scullen  OJ, Sommers  C. The evaluation of gamma irradiation and cold storage for the reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken livers. Food Microbiol. 2019;82:24953. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. World Health Organization. Safety and nutritional adequacy of irradiated food. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994 [cited 2022 Nov 16]. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/39463
  10. Ablan  M, Low  MSF, Marshall  KE, Devchand  R, Koehler  L, Hume  H, et al. Focus groups exploring U.S. adults’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to irradiation as a food safety intervention, 2021. Food Prot Trends. 2023;43:44856.

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3006.230922

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 6—June 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Marta Zlotnick, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop H24-11, Atlanta, GA 30329-4018, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: May 09, 2024
Page updated: May 22, 2024
Page reviewed: May 22, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external