Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE): Protein subunit RSV vaccines (GSK Arexvy and Pfizer Abrysvo) in older adults

Overview

A Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) review of the evidence of benefits and harms from protein subunit RSV vaccination (GSK Arexvy and Pfizer Abrysvo) in adults aged ≥60 years was presented to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on June 26, 2024. GRADE evidence type indicates the certainty in estimates from the available body of evidence. Evidence certainty ranges from high certainty to very low certainty.1

The policy questions were, “Should all adults aged ≥75 years be recommended to receive a single dose of RSV vaccination?” and “Should adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease be recommended to receive a single dose of RSV vaccination?” These policy questions were not specific to RSV vaccine product, but GRADE review was separated by vaccine type* (protein subunit vaccines, mRNA vaccine). On this webpage GRADE for the protein subunit vaccine products (GSK Arexvy and Pfizer Abrysvo) is reviewed.

The ACIP Work Group for RSV prevention in adults (Work Group) chose the following benefits outcomes as critical or important to policy decisions: prevention of RSV lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) (important), medically attended RSV LRTD (critical), hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness (critical), severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support (important), and death due to RSV respiratory illness (important). The harms chosen by the Work Group as critical or important to policy decisions were serious adverse events (critical), inflammatory neurologic events (critical), and reactogenicity grade ≥3 (important).

A systematic review of evidence of the efficacy and safety of protein subunit RSV vaccines among persons aged 60 years and older was conducted. The quality of evidence from two phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and two phase 1/2 RCTs were assessed using the GRADE approach2-8. Efficacy findings were based on analyses of data collected during May 2021–September 2023 for GSK Arexvy and August 2021–November 2023 for Pfizer Abrysvo.

In adults aged ≥75 years, using the pooled available data from both phase 3 trials, a lower rate of RSV LRTD§,¶ was observed with vaccination compared with placebo (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15, 0.63]; evidence certainty: high) corresponding to a vaccine efficacy of 69.4% (95% CI: 36.6%, 85.3%). A lower rate of medically attended RSV LRTD**,†† was also observed in adults aged ≥75 years (IRR 0.23 [95% CI: 0.13, 0.42]; evidence certainty: moderate) corresponding to a vaccine efficacy against medically attended RSV LRTD of 76.6% (95% CI: 58.5%, 86.8%). Using person-time from all trial participants aged ≥60 years (i.e. not limited only to adults aged ≥75 years), there were insufficient cases to detect a lower rate of hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness (IRR 0.24 [95% CI: 0.05, 1.13]; evidence certainty: low) or severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support (IRR 0.37 [95% CI: 0.07, 1.89]; evidence certainty: very low). Vaccine efficacy against hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness or severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support were 75.7% (95% CI: -12.5%, 94.8%) and 62.7% (95% CI: -88.7%, 92.6%), respectively. No deaths due to RSV respiratory illness were identified among vaccine recipients or placebo recipients in either trial.

For adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease,§§,¶¶ using pooled data available from both the GSK and Pfizer phase 3 trials, a lower rate of RSV LRTD was observed with vaccination compared with placebo (IRR 0.27 [95% CI: 0.18, 0.41]; evidence certainty: high) corresponding to a vaccine efficacy of 73.1% (95% CI: 58.7%, 82.4%). A lower rate of medically attended RSV LRTD was also observed (IRR 0.27 [95% CI: 0.16, 0.47], evidence certainty: high); vaccine efficacy against medically attended RSV LRTD was 72.7% (95% CI: 52.9%, 84.2%). As for adults aged ≥75 years, GRADE assessment of hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness, severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support, and death due to RSV respiratory illness included data from all trial participants aged ≥60 years (rather than those 60-74 at increased risk of severe disease only). Therefore, the effect estimates and certainty assessments were the same as for adults aged ≥75 years.

In terms of harms, data were included from all trial participants aged ≥60 years, so effect estimates and certainty assessments were the same for both policy questions (pertaining to adults aged ≥75 years, and adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease). The pooled data available from both phase 3 RCTs and from the two additional phase 1/2 RCTs indicated that serious adverse events (SAEs)***, ††† were balanced between participants in the vaccine and placebo arms (risk ratio [RR] 1.01; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.10; evidence certainty: moderate). Reactogenicity grade ≥3§§§,¶¶¶ may be increased with vaccine compared to placebo (RR 1.92; 95% CI: 0.78, 4.70; evidence certainty: low). Protein subunit vaccination may increase inflammatory neurologic events,**** but the effect is very uncertain (RR: 1.76; 95% CI: 0.29, 10.77; evidence certainty: very low).

Importantly, GRADE includes only data from studies identified during systematic review. At the June 2024 ACIP meeting, additional unpublished post-licensure data on RSV vaccines from CDC and FDA systems on vaccine effectiveness and safety were also reviewed. A summary of these additional considerations may be found in the Evidence to Recommendation (EtR) profile (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/protein-subunit-rsv-vaccines-older-adults-etr.html).

Introduction

In 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Biologics License Application (BLA) for use of GSK’s Arexvy and Pfizer’s Abrysvo RSV vaccines in adults aged ≥60 years. In June 2023, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), recommended that adults aged ≥60 years may receive RSV vaccination, using shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). Following a year of implementation of SCDM, CDC received feedback that this type of recommendation was challenging for providers to implement and was not always implemented as ACIP had intended. In addition, new data on RSV vaccine safety and vaccine effectiveness became available from post-licensure studies. Taking into account the challenges of SCDM, along with the updated evidence on balance of benefits and risks, two new proposed recommendations were brought to ACIP in June 2024: 1) a universal recommendation in adults aged ≥75 years and 2) a risk-based recommendation in adults aged 60–74 years. As part of the process employed by the ACIP, a systematic review and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment of the evidence was conducted and presented to ACIP.1 The ACIP adopted a modified GRADE approach in 2010 as the framework for evaluating the scientific evidence that informs recommendations for vaccine use. Evidence of benefits and harms were reviewed based on the GRADE approach.1 No conflicts of interest were reported by CDC and ACIP RSV Vaccines Work Group members involved in the GRADE analysis.

The policy questions under consideration were, “Should all adults aged ≥75 years be recommended to receive a single dose of RSV vaccination?” and “Should adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease be recommended to receive a single dose of RSV vaccination?” (Table 1).

Methods

During August 2023 to June 2024, CDC conducted a systematic review of evidence on the efficacy and safety of protein subunit RSV vaccines (GSK Arexvy and Pfizer Abrysvo). We assessed outcomes and evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach.

Work Group members were asked to pre-specify and rate the importance of relevant patient-important outcomes (including benefits and harms) before the GRADE assessment (Table 2). The benefits of interest selected by the Work Group were prevention of: RSV lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) (important), medically attended RSV LRTD (critical), hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness (critical), severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support (important), and death due to RSV illness (important). Pre-specified harms of interest were serious adverse events (critical), inflammatory neurologic events (critical), and reactogenicity (grade ≥3) (important).

A systematic literature search was completed to review all available evidence on the efficacy and safety of protein subunit RSV vaccines. Records of relevant observational studies as well as randomized controlled trials were included if they 1) provided data on persons aged ≥60 years vaccinated with any protein subunit vaccine; 2) involved human subjects; 3) reported primary data; and 4) included data relevant to the efficacy and safety outcomes being measured. We identified relevant studies through Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov. Relevant observational studies were restricted to the defined population, intervention, comparison, and outcome outlined in the policy question, or related outcomes if direct data were not available. In addition, unpublished relevant data from the identified studies were obtained through personal communication with the vaccine manufacturers. The systematic review was conducted as of August 2023. Characteristics of all included studies are shown in Appendix 1 and evidence retrieval methods are found in Appendix 2.

The evidence certainty assessment addressed risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and other characteristics. The GRADE assessment across the body of evidence for each outcome was presented in an evidence profile; evidence certainty was assigned as high, moderate, low, or very low.

To assess efficacy, incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated using pooled event counts and total person-time available from the phase 3 clinical trials. IRRs included follow-up time up to 2 calendar years and were estimates of the ratio of the cumulative incidence during this time. Vaccine efficacy estimates were defined as 100% x (1-IRR). Efficacy estimates in this assessment correspond only to a single dose of RSV vaccine, compared with placebo In the GSK phase 3 trial, some participants who received the RSV vaccine were re-randomized to receive a second dose 12 months after the first dose. Among those participants, efficacy follow up time after the second dose of RSV vaccine was excluded from this GRADE assessment. To assess safety, risk ratios were calculated using counts of events and total participants available in the body of evidence, including both the phase 3 RCTs and both phase 1/2 RCTs. All analyses were performed using R version 4.4.0.

Results

The results of the GRADE assessment were presented to ACIP on June 26, 2024. Data were reviewed from two published phase 3 RCTs and two published phase 1/2 RCTs, including additional unpublished data from each trial provided by the manufacturers.2-8 Characteristics of the included studies are shown in Appendix 1.

In evaluation of benefits, mean follow up from the Pfizer phase 3 RCT was 16 months post-vaccination per participant (median 17) and mean follow up from the GSK phase 3 RCT was 19 months post-vaccination per participant (median 23).

For the policy question in adults aged ≥75 years, protein subunit RSV vaccines reduced RSV LRTD (vaccine efficacy: 69.4% [95% CI: 36.6%, 85.3%]) (Table 3a). Protein subunit RSV vaccines also reduced medically attended RSV LRTD (vaccine efficacy: 76.6% [95% CI: 58.5%, 86.8%]) (Table 3b). The trials had insufficient events to detect a lower rate of hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness and severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support (vaccine efficacy: 75.7% [95% CI: -12.5%, 94.8%] and 62.7% [95% CI: -88.7, 92.6], respectively) (Table 3c, Table 3d). No deaths due to RSV respiratory illness were identified among vaccine recipients or placebo recipients in either phase 3 trial.

For the policy question in adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease, protein subunit RSV vaccines reduced RSV LRTD (pooled vaccine efficacy: 73.1% [95% CI: 58.7%, 82.4%]) (Table 4a). Protein subunit RSV vaccines also reduced medically attended RSV LRTD (pooled vaccine efficacy: 72.7% [95% CI: 52.9%, 84.2%]) (Table 4b). The trials had insufficient events to detect a lower rate of hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness and severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support (pooled vaccine efficacy: 75.7% [95% CI: -12.5%, 94.8%] and 62.7% [95% CI: -88.7, 92.6], respectively) (Table 3c, Table 3d). No deaths due to RSV respiratory illness were identified among vaccine recipients or placebo recipients in either phase 3 trial.

Harms data were available from the Pfizer phase 3 RCT as well as an earlier phase 1/2 trial and from the GSK phase 3 RCT as well as an earlier phase 1/2 trial. Evidence for harm outcomes included all adults aged ≥60 years, so effect estimates were the same for both policy questions (pertaining to adults aged ≥75 years, and adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease). Proportions of participants with SAEs were comparable between the vaccine and the placebo groups (pooled RR: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.93, 1.10]) (Table 3e). The pooled RR for neurological events following vaccination was 1.76 (95% CI: 0.29, 10.77) (Table 3f). The pooled relative risk for reactogenicity (grade ≥3) was 1.92 (0.78, 4.70) (Table 3g).

GRADE Summary

The initial GRADE evidence certainty level was high for each outcome because the body of evidence consisted of randomized controlled trials (Table 5a and 5b).

Regarding critical benefits outcomes in adults aged ≥75 years, the available data indicated that protein subunit RSV vaccination likely reduces medically attended RSV LRTD with moderate certainty. Certainty was downgraded once due to serious concern for indirectness due to inclusion of adults aged 60–74 years in effect estimates (data from GSK). The available data indicated that protein subunit RSV vaccination may reduce RSV hospitalization with low certainty. Certainty for hospitalization was downgraded twice: once due to serious concern for indirectness due to inclusion of adults aged 60–74 years, and once for imprecision due to the confidence intervals containing absolute risk reduction estimates for which different policy decisions might be considered.

For important benefits outcomes in adults aged ≥75 years, the available data indicated that protein subunit RSV vaccination reduces RSV LRTD with high certainty, and may reduce severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support certainty with very low certainty (downgraded once for serious concern for indirectness [again due to inclusion of adults 60–74], once for serious concern for imprecision [due to the confidence intervals containing absolute risk reduction estimates for which different policy decisions might be considered], and once for inconsistency [point estimates between the studies differed substantially]).

In terms of critical benefits outcomes in adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease, the available data indicated that protein subunit RSV vaccination reduces medically attended RSV LRTD with high certainty and may reduce RSV hospitalization with low certainty. Evidence certainty for RSV hospitalization was downgraded once for serious concern for indirectness due to inclusion of adults without chronic medical conditions as well as once for imprecision due to the confidence intervals containing absolute risk reduction estimates for which different policy decisions might be considered.

For important benefits outcomes in adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease, the available data indicated that protein subunit RSV vaccination reduces RSV LRTD with high certainty, and may reduce severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support with very low certainty (downgraded once for serious concern for indirectness [again due to inclusion of adults without chronic medical conditions], once for serious concern for imprecision [due to the confidence intervals containing absolute risk reduction estimates for which different policy decisions might be considered], and once for inconsistency [point estimates between the studies differed substantially]).

For harms in both adults aged ≥75 years and 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease, all outcomes were downgraded at least once for indirectness due to inclusion of adults aged 60–74 years (when evaluating the policy question in adults aged ≥75 years), or inclusion of adults without comorbidities (when evaluating the policy question in adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease). Available data indicated that protein subunit RSV vaccination likely results in little to no difference in serious adverse events, with moderate certainty. Protein subunit RSV vaccination may increase severe reactogenicity events, with low certainty. In addition to the indirectness downgrade, this outcome was also downgraded once for imprecision (due to the width of the confidence interval containing estimates for which different policy decisions might be considered). Protein subunit RSV vaccination may increase inflammatory neurologic events, with very low certainty. In addition to the indirectness downgrade, this outcome was also downgraded twice for imprecision (due to the width of the confidence interval containing estimates for which different policy decisions might be considered and due to fragility of the estimate).

Footnotes

* For details on the GRADE assessment for mRNA RSV vaccine (Moderna mRESVIA) please see https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/mrna-rsv-vaccine-older-adults.html.

† Incidence rate ratios and efficacy estimates were independently calculated by CDC using counts of events ≥14 days after injection and total person-time available from the phase 3 trials (Efficacy= 1 – incidence rate ratio x 100%).

§ GSK phase 3 trial: RSV lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) was defined by the presence of ≥2 lower respiratory symptoms or signs for ≥24 hours including ≥1 lower respiratory sign, or ≥3 lower respiratory symptoms ≥24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, and new or increased dyspnea. Lower respiratory signs included new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles or rhonchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate ≥20 respirations per minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (<95% or ≤90% if baseline was <95%), and need for oxygen supplementation.

Pfizer phase 3 trial: The Pfizer phase 3 trial had two co-primary endpoints, defined as RSV lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) with ≥2 or ≥3 lower respiratory signs or symptoms. In GRADE, only LRTI with ≥3 lower respiratory signs or symptoms was considered. Lower respiratory signs and symptoms included new or worsened cough, new or worsened sputum production, new or worsened wheezing, new or worsened shortness of breath, and new or worsened tachypnea.

** GSK phase 3 trial: Medically attended LRTD was defined as attention at ≥1 inpatient or outpatient health care service. These estimates were not included in per-protocol assessments.

†† Pfizer phase 3 trial: Medically attended RSV lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) with ≥3 signs or symptoms included LRTI prompting any health care visit (including any outpatient or inpatient visit such as hospitalization, ER visit, urgent care visit, home healthcare services, primary care physician office visit, pulmonologist office visit, specialist office visit, other visit, or telehealth contact).

§§ GSK phase 3 trial: Adults aged ≥60 years with pre-existing comorbidities of interest includes adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, any chronic respiratory/pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus Type 1 or Type 2, or advanced liver or renal disease.

¶¶ Pfizer phase 3 trial:  Adults aged ≥60 years with pre-specified significant conditions includes adults with current tobacco use, diabetes, lung disease [including COPD], heart disease [including congestive heart failure], liver disease, or renal disease.

*** GSK trials: Serious adverse events were defined as any untoward medical occurrence (during six months after injection in the phase 3 trials and 60 days after injection in the phase 1/2 trials) that resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability or incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly or birth defect.

†† Pfizer trials: Serious adverse events were defined as any untoward medical occurrence (through day 182 after injection in the phase 3 trial and 60 days for the phase 1/2 trial) that resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability or incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly or birth defect.

§§§ GSK trials: Severe reactogenicity events were defined as grade 3 solicited local reactions (injection site pain, redness and swelling) or systemic reactions (fatigue, fever, headache, gastrointestinal symptoms [nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or abdominal pain], arthralgia, myalgia and shivering) recorded during days 0–4 after vaccination in the phase 3 trial and days 0–7 after vaccination in the phase 1/2 trial. For injection site erythema and swelling, grade 3 corresponded to a diameter >100 mm. For fever, grade 3 corresponded to a temperature >39°C. For all other reactions, grade 3 corresponded to reactions that prevented normal, everyday activities. Grade 4 events were not defined in these trials.

¶¶¶ Pfizer trials: Severe reactogenicity events were defined as grade 3 or higher solicited injection site reaction (pain at injection site, redness and swelling) or systemic reaction (fever, fatigue/tiredness, headache, nausea, muscle pain, joint pain, vomiting, diarrhea, and other systemic event) during days 0–7 after vaccination. For injection site redness and swelling, grade 3 corresponded to a diameter >10.0 cm from e-diary or severe grade from adverse event case report form. For fever, grade 3 corresponded to a temperature >38.9°C from e-diary or severe grade from adverse event case report form. For all other reactions, grade 3 corresponded to reactions that prevented normal, everyday activities. Grade 4 event is only applicable to fever >40℃.

**** Inflammatory neurologic events were defined as Guillain-Barre syndrome (including variants thereof), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and acute central nervous system inflammation (e.g., transverse myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) occurring within 42 days after vaccination.

References

  1. S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Handbook for Developing Evidence-based Recommendations: Formulating questions, conducting the systematic review, and assessing the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/downloads/ACIP-GRADE-Handbook_4-22-24.pdf
  2. Papi A, Ison MG, Langley JM, et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine in Older Adults. NEJM. 2023; 388:595–608 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2209604
  3. Ison MG, Papi A, Athan E, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Prefusion F Protein Vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in Older Adults Over 2 RSV Seasons. CID. 2024; online ahead of print https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae010
  4. Leroux-Roels I, David MG, Steenackers K, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F (RSVPreF3) Candidate Vaccine in Older Adults: Phase 1/2 Randomized Clinical Trial, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 227, Issue 6, 15 March 2023, Pages 761–772, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac327
  5. GSK data on file, personal communication, August 2022 – June 2024. Data provided to ACIP work Group for RSV in Adults. United Kingdom; June 2024.
  6. Walsh EE, Pérez Marc G, Zareba AM, et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Bivalent RSV Prefusion F Vaccine in Older Adults. NEJM 2023. 388(16): 1465-1477. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2213836
  7. Falsey AR, Walsh EE, Scott DA, et al. Phase 1/2 Randomized Study of the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine in Adults with Concomitant Inactivated Influenza Vaccine. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 225(12): 2056-2066. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiab611
  8. Pfizer. Pfizer data on file, personal communication, August 2022 – May 2024. Data provided to ACIP work Group for RSV in Adults. New York, NY; June 2024.

Table 1: Policy Questions and Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO)

Table 1a: Policy Question and PICO for Adults Aged ≥75 Years

Table 1a: Policy Question and PICO for Adults Aged ≥75 Years
Policy question: Should all adults aged ≥75 years be recommended to receive a single dose of RSV vaccination?
Population Adults aged ≥75 years
Intervention A single dose of protein subunit RSV vaccine (GSK Arexvy or Pfizer Abrysvo)
Comparison No RSV vaccine
Outcomes RSV Lower Respiratory Tract Disease (LRTD)

Medically attended RSV LRTD

Hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness

Severe RSV respiratory illness requiring oxygen/respiratory support

Death due to RSV respiratory illness

Serious adverse events

Inflammatory neurologic events

Reactogenicity (grade ≥3)

Table 1b: Policy Question and PICO for Adults Aged 60–74 Years at Increased Risk of Severe RSV Disease

Table 1b: Policy Question and PICO for Adults Aged 60–74 Years at Increased Risk of Severe RSV Disease
Policy question: Should adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV disease be recommended to receive a single dose of RSV vaccination?
Population Adults aged 60–74 at increased risk of severe RSV disease
Intervention A single dose of protein subunit RSV vaccine (GSK Arexvy or Pfizer Abrysvo)
Comparison No RSV vaccine
Outcomes RSV LRTD

Medically attended RSV LRTD

Hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness

Severe RSV respiratory illness requiring oxygen/respiratory support

Death due to RSV respiratory illness

Serious adverse events

Inflammatory neurologic events

Reactogenicity (grade ≥3)

Table 2: Outcomes and Rankings

Table 2: Outcomes and Rankings
Outcome Importancea Included in evidence profile (yes, no)
RSV LRTD Important Yes
Medically attended RSV LRTD Critical Yes
Hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness Critical Yes
Severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen/respiratory support Important Yes
Death due to RSV respiratory illness Important Nob
Serious adverse events Critical Yes
Inflammatory neurologic events Critical Yes
Reactogenicity (grade ≥3) Important Yes

a Three options: 1. Critical; 2.  Important but not critical; 3. Not important for decision-making
b No events were recorded in included studies, so the outcome could not be evaluated.

Table 3: Summary of Studies Reporting Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years

Table 3a: Summary of Studies Reporting RSV LRTD

Table 3a: Summary of Studies Reporting RSV LRTD
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine Efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥75 yearsa 7/2672 participants (3512 person years of observation) 28/2647 participants (4541 person years of observation) Placebo 67.7% (26.0, 85.9) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥75 yearsb 2/2892 participants (3846 person years of observation) 8/2904 participants (3875 person years of observation) Placebo 74.8% (-18.6, 94.7) Not Serious
Pooled efficacy estimate, meta-analysisc N/A N/A N/A N/A 69.4% (36.6, 85.3) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a ≥2 lower respiratory trace disease symptoms or signs for ≥24 hours including ≥1 lower respiratory sign, or ≥3 lower respiratory symptoms for ≥24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, and new or increased dyspnea. Lower respiratory signs included new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles or rhonchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate ≥20 respirations per minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (<95% or ≤90% if baseline was <95%), and need for oxygen supplementation.

b ≥3 lower respiratory trace disease signs or symptoms. Lower respiratory signs and symptoms included new or worsened cough, new or worsened sputum production, new or worsened wheezing, new or worsened shortness of breath, and new or worsened tachypnea.

c Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

Table 3b: Summary of Studies Reporting Medically Attended RSV LRTD

Table 3b: Summary of Studies Reporting Medically Attended RSV LRTD
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine Efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 yearsa 12/12468 participants (16928 person years of observation) 69/12498 participants (21831 person years of observation) Placebo 77.6% (58.6, 87.9) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥75 yearsb 2/2892 participants (3846 person years of observation) 6/2904 participants (3875 person years of observation) Placebo 66.4% (-66.4, 93.2) Not Serious
Pooled efficacy estimate, meta-analysisc N/A N/A N/A N/A 76.6% (58.5, 86.8) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Medically attended RSV LRTD was defined as RSV LRTD with attention at ≥1 inpatient or outpatient health care service.

b Medically attended RSV lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) included LRTI prompting any health care visit (including any outpatient or inpatient visit such as hospitalization, ER visit, urgent care visit, home healthcare services, primary care physician office visit, pulmonologist office visit, specialist office visit, other visit, or telehealth contact).

c Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

Table 3c: Summary of Studies Reporting Hospitalization for RSV Respiratory Illness

Table 3c: Summary of Studies Reporting Hospitalization for RSV Respiratory Illness
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 1/12469 participants (14677 person years of observation) 5/12498 participants (17346 person years of observation) Placebo 76.4% (-102.3, 97.2) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 1/18050 participants (24646 person years of observation) 4/18074 participants (24616 person years of observation) Placebo 75.0% (-123.4, 97.2) Not Serious
Pooled efficacy estimate, meta-analysisa N/A N/A N/A N/A 75.7% (-12.5, 94.8) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

Table 3d: Summary of Studies Reporting Severe RSV Respiratory Illness Requiring O2/Respiratory Support

Table 3d: Summary of Studies Reporting Severe RSV Respiratory Illness Requiring O2/Respiratory Support
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine Efficacy  (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 1/12469 participants (14676 person years of observation) 5/12498 participants (17346 person years of observation) Placebo 76.4% (-102.3, 97.2) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 1/18050 participants (24646 person years of observation) 1/18074 participants (24616 person years of observation) Placebo 0.1% (-1496.8, 93.8) Not Serious
Pooled efficacy estimate, meta-analysisa N/A N/A N/A N/A 62.7% (-88.7, 92.6) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

Table 3e: Summary of Studies Reporting Serous Adverse Events

Table 3e: Summary of Studies Reporting Serous Adverse Events
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine RR (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturera,2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 548/12,470 participantsb,c (4.4%) 539/12,503 participantsc (4.3%) Placebo 1.02 (0.91, 1.15) Not Serious
Leroux-Roels I, et. al. 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturera,4,5 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-80 years 1/100 participantsb,d (1.0%) 1/101 participantsd (1.0%) Placebo 1.01 (0.06, 15.93) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturere,6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 483/18,573 participants f,g (2.6%) 477/18,288 participants (2.6%) Placebo 1.00 (0.88, 1.13) Not Serious
Falsey et al., 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturere,7,8 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-85 years 2/48 participantsg (4.2%) 2/47 participants (4.2%) Placebo 0.98 (0.14, 6.67) Not Serious
Pooled relative risk estimate, meta-analysish N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Serious adverse events were defined as any untoward medical occurrence (during six months after injection in the phase 3 trial and 60 days after injection in the phase 1/2 trial) that resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability or incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly or birth defect.

b Intervention was a single dose of GSK Arexvy (120µg antigen + AS01E adjuvant, 1 dose IM).

c Includes all events for 6 months after injection.

d Includes all events after dose 1, but before dose 2 (day 61) in a placebo-controlled phase 1/2 dosing selection study.

e Serious adverse events were defined as any untoward medical occurrence (through day 182 after injection in the phase 3 trial and 60 days for the phase 1/2 trial) that resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability or incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly or birth defect.

f Intervention was a single dose of Pfizer Abrysvo (120µg antigen, 1 dose IM).

g All events reported from vaccination through day 182.

h Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect model.

Table 3f: Summary of Studies Reporting Inflammatory Neurologic Eventsa

Table 3f: Summary of Studies Reporting Inflammatory Neurologic Eventsa
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine RR (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 0/12740b 0/12503 Placebo 1.00 (0.02, 50.53)c Not Serious
Leroux-Roels I, et. al. 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer 4,5 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-80 years 0/100b 0/101 Placebo 1.01 (0.02, 50.41)c Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer 6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 2/18573 (0.01%)d,e 0/18288 Placebo 4.92 (0.24, 102.54)c Not Serious
Falsey et al., 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer 7,8 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-85 years 0/48d 0/47 Placebo 0.98 (0.02, 48.36)c Not Serious
Pooled relative risk estimate, meta-analysisf N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.76 (0.29, 10.77) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Guillain-Barre syndrome (including variants thereof), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and acute central nervous system inflammation (e.g., transverse myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) occurring within 42 days after injection.

b Intervention was a single dose of GSK Arexvy (120µg antigen + AS01E adjuvant, 1 dose IM).

c Calculated using 0.5 correction factor to account for zero events.

d Intervention was a single dose of Pfizer Abrysvo (120µg antigen, 1 dose IM).

e In the Pfizer phase 3 RCT there were a total of three cases of inflammatory neurologic events initially identified as occurring within 42 days after injection reported by investigators. All occurred in the intervention arm. These included GBS (14 days post-vaccination), Miller Fisher syndrome (a variant of GBS; 10 days post-vaccination), and undifferentiated motor-sensory axonal polyneuropathy (site investigator reported this case as not associated with vaccination; participant had worsening of pre-existing symptoms 21 days post-vaccination). After further investigation, the case of undifferentiated motor-sensory axonal polyneuropathy was excluded. This is a revision since the June 2023 GRADE.

f Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect model.

Table 3g: Summary of Studies Reporting Severe Reactogenicity

Table 3g: Summary of Studies Reporting Severe Reactogenicity
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine RR (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturera, 2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 36/879 (4.1%)b,c 8/878 (0.9%) Placebo 4.49 (2.10, 9.61) Not Serious
Leroux-Roels I, et. al. 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturera, 4,5 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-80 years 1/100 (1.0%)b,d 1/98 (1.0%) Placebo 0.98 (0.06, 15.45) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturere, 6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 35/3628 (1.0%)c,f 22/3447 (0.6%) Placebo 1.51 (0.89, 2.57) Not Serious
Falsey et al., 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturere, 7,8 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-85 years 1/48 (2.1%)c,f 2/46 (4.3%) Placebo 0.48 (0.04, 5.11) Not Serious
Pooled relative risk estimate, meta-analysisg N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.92 (0.78, 4.70) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Severe reactogenicity events were defined as grade 3 solicited local reactions (injection site pain, redness and swelling) or systemic reactions (fatigue, fever, headache, gastrointestinal symptoms [nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or abdominal pain], arthralgia, myalgia and shivering) recorded during days 0–4 after vaccination in the phase 3 trial and days 0–7 after vaccination in the phase 1/2 trial. For injection site erythema and swelling, grade 3 corresponded to a diameter >100 mm. For fever, grade 3 corresponded to a temperature >39°C. For all other reactions, grade 3 corresponded to reactions that prevented normal, everyday activities. Grade 4 events were not defined in these trials.

b Intervention was a single dose of GSK Arexvy (120µg antigen + AS01E adjuvant, 1 dose IM).

c All events within 4 days of injection.

d All events within 7 days of injection.

e Severe reactogenicity events were defined as grade 3 or higher injection site reaction (pain at injection site, redness and swelling) or systemic reaction (fever, fatigue/tiredness, headache, nausea, muscle pain, joint pain, vomiting, diarrhea, and other systemic event) during days 0–7 after vaccination. For injection site redness and swelling, grade 3 corresponded to a diameter >10.0 cm from e-diary or severe grade from adverse event case report form. For fever, grade 3 corresponded to a temperature >38.9°C from e-diary or severe grade from adverse event case report form. For all other reactions, grade 3 corresponded to reactions that prevented normal, everyday activities. Grade 4 event is only applicable to fever >40℃.

f Intervention was a single dose of Pfizer Abrysvo (120µg antigen, 1 dose IM).

g Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect model.

Table 4 Summary of Studies Reporting Outcomes in Adults Aged 60–74 Years at Increased Risk of Severe RSV Disease

Table 4a Summary of Studies Reporting RSV LRTD

Table 4a Summary of Studies Reporting RSV LRTD
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance n/N intervention n/N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer 2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years with ≥1 of specific medical conditionsa,b 17/5000 participants (6785 person years of observation) 79/4942 participants (8548 person years of observation) Placebo 72.9% (54.2, 84.0) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer 6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years with ≥1 prespecified significant conditionc,d 9/9387 participants (12731 person years of observation) 34/9448 participants (12792 person years of observation) Placebo 73.4% (44.6, 87.2) Not Serious
Pooled efficacy estimate, meta-analysise N/A N/A N/A N/A 73.1% (58.7, 82.4) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Pre-existing comorbidities of interest (“specific medical conditions”) includes adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, any chronic respiratory/pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus Type 1 or Type 2, or advanced liver or renal disease.

b Lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) was defined as ≥2 lower respiratory symptoms or signs for ≥24 hours including ≥1 lower respiratory sign, or ≥3 lower respiratory symptoms ≥24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, and new or increased dyspnea. Lower respiratory signs included new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles or rhonchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate ≥20 respirations per minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (<95% or ≤90% if baseline was <95%), and need for oxygen supplementation

c Pre-specified significant condition includes adults with current tobacco use, diabetes, lung disease [including COPD], heart disease [including congestive heart failure], liver disease, or renal disease.

d LRTD was defined using the trial out of lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) with ≥3 lower respiratory signs or symptoms. Lower respiratory signs and symptoms included new or worsened cough, new or worsened sputum production, new or worsened wheezing, new or worsened shortness of breath, and new or worsened tachypnea.

e Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

Table 4b Summary of Studies Reporting Medically Attended RSV LRTD

Table 4b Summary of Studies Reporting Medically Attended RSV LRTD
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer 2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years with ≥1 of specific medical conditionsa 8/5000 participants (6793 person years of observation) 41/4942 participants (8580 person years of observation) Placebo 75.4% (47.4, 88.5) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer 6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years with ≥1 prespecified significant conditionb 8/9387 participants (12731 person years of observation) 26/9448 participants (12792 person years of observation) Placebo 69.1% (31.7, 86.0) Not Serious
Pooled efficacy estimate, meta-analysisc N/A N/A N/A N/A 72.7% (52.9, 84.2) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Pre-existing comorbidities of interest (“specific medical conditions”) includes adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, any chronic respiratory/pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus Type 1 or Type 2, or advanced liver or renal disease.

b Pre-specified significant condition includes adults with current tobacco use, diabetes, lung disease [including COPD], heart disease [including congestive heart failure], liver disease, or renal disease.

c Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

Table 4c: Summary of Studies Reporting Hospitalization for RSV Respiratory Illness

Table 4b Summary of Studies Reporting Medically Attended RSV LRTD
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 1/12469 participants (14677 person years of observation) 5/12498 participants (17346 person years of observation) Placebo 76.4% (-102.3, 97.2) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 1/18050 participants (24646 person years of observation) 4/18074 participants (24616 person years of observation) Placebo 75.0% (-123.4, 97.2) Not Serious
Pooled efficacy estimate, meta-analysisa N/A N/A N/A N/A 75.7% (-12.5, 94.8) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

Table 4d: Summary of Studies Reporting Severe RSV Respiratory Illness Requiring O2/Respiratory Support

Table 4b Summary of Studies Reporting Medically Attended RSV LRTD
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 1/12469 participants (14676 person years of observation) 5/12498 participants (17346 person years of observation) Placebo 76.4% (-102.3, 97.2) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 1/18050 participants (24646 person years of observation) 4/18074 participants (24616 person years of observation) Placebo 0.1% (-1496.8, 93.8) Not Serious
Pooled efficacy estimate, meta-analysisa N/A N/A N/A N/A 62.7 (-88.7, 92.6) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

Table 4e: Summary of Studies Reporting Serous Adverse Events

Table 4e: Summary of Studies Reporting Serous Adverse Events
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturera 2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 548/12,470 participantsb,c (4.4%) 539/12,503 participantsc (4.3%) Placebo 1.02 (0.91, 1.15) Not Serious
Leroux-Roels I, et. al. 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturera 4,5 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-80 years 1/100 participantsb,d (1.0%) 1/101 participantsd (1.0%) Placebo 1.01 (0.06, 15.93) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturere 6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 483/18,573 participants f,g (2.6%) 477/18,288 participants (2.6%) Placebo 1.00 (0.88, 1.13) Not Serious
Falsey et al., 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturere 7,8 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-85 years 2/48 participantsg (4.2%) 2/47 participants (4.2%) Placebo 0.98 (0.14, 6.67) Not Serious
Pooled relative risk estimate, meta-analysish N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Serious adverse events were defined as any untoward medical occurrence (during six months after injection in the phase 3 trial and 60 days after injection in the phase 1/2 trial) that resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability or incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly or birth defect.

b Intervention was a single dose of GSK Arexvy (120µg antigen + AS01E adjuvant, 1 dose IM).

c Includes all events for 6 months after injection.

d Includes all events after dose 1, but before dose 2 (day 61) in a placebo-controlled phase 1/2 dosing selection study.

e Serious adverse events were defined as any untoward medical occurrence (through day 182 after injection in the phase 3 trial and 60 days for the phase 1/2 trial) that resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability or incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly or birth defect.

f Intervention was a single dose of Pfizer Abrysvo (120µg antigen, 1 dose IM).

g All events reported from vaccination through day 182.

h Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel random effect model.

Table 4f: Summary of Studies Reporting Inflammatory Neurologic Eventsa

Table 4f: Summary of Studies Reporting Inflammatory Neurologic Eventsa
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer 2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 0/12740b 0/12503 Placebo 1.00 (0.02, 50.53)c Not Serious
Leroux-Roels I, et. al. 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer4,5 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-80 years 0/100b 0/101 Placebo 1.01 (0.02, 50.41)c Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 2/18573 (0.01%)d,e 0/18288 Placebo 4.92 (0.24, 102.54)c Not Serious
Falsey et al., 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer7,8 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-85 years 0/48d 0/47 Placebo 0.98 (0.02, 48.36)c Not Serious
Pooled relative risk estimate, meta-analysisf N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.76 (0.29, 10.77) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Guillain-Barre syndrome (including variants thereof), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and acute central nervous system inflammation (e.g., transverse myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) occurring within 42 days after injection.

b Intervention was a single dose of GSK Arexvy (120µg antigen + AS01E adjuvant, 1 dose IM).

c Calculated using 0.5 correction factor to account for zero events.

d Intervention was a single dose of Pfizer Abrysvo (120µg antigen, 1 dose IM).

e In the Pfizer phase 3 RCT there were a total of three cases of inflammatory neurologic events initially identified as occurring within 42 days after injection reported by investigators. All occurred in the intervention arm. These included GBS (14 days post-vaccination), Miller Fisher syndrome (a variant of GBS; 10 days post-vaccination), and undifferentiated motor-sensory axonal polyneuropathy (site investigator reported this case as not associated with vaccination; participant had worsening of pre-existing symptoms 21 days post-vaccination). After further investigation, the case of undifferentiated motor-sensory axonal polyneuropathy was excluded. This is a revision since the June 2023 GRADE.

f Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect model.

Table 4g: Summary of Studies Reporting Severe Reactogenicity

Table 4g: Summary of Studies Reporting Severe Reactogenicity
Authors last name, pub year Age or other characteristic of importance N intervention N comparison Comparator vaccine Vaccine efficacy (95% CI) Study limitations (Risk of Bias)
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturera 2,3,5 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 36/879 (4.1%)b,c 8/878 (0.9%) Placebo 4.49 (2.10, 9.61) Not Serious
Leroux-Roels I, et. al. 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturera 4,5 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-80 years 1/100 (1.0%)b,d 1/98 (1.0%) Placebo 0.98 (0.06, 15.45) Not Serious
Walsh EE, et al. 2023 plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturere 6,8 Phase 3 RCT, persons aged ≥60 years 35/3628 (1.0%)c,f 22/3447 (0.6%) Placebo 1.51 (0.89, 2.57) Not Serious
Falsey et al., 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturere 7,8 Phase 1/2 RCT, persons aged 60-85 years 1/48 (2.1%)c,f 2/46 (4.3%) Placebo 0.48 (0.04, 5.11) Not Serious
Pooled relative risk estimate, meta-analysisg N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.92 (0.78, 4.70) N/A

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

a Severe reactogenicity events were defined as grade 3 solicited local reactions (injection site pain, redness and swelling) or systemic reactions (fatigue, fever, headache, gastrointestinal symptoms [nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or abdominal pain], arthralgia, myalgia and shivering) recorded during days 0–4 after vaccination in the phase 3 trial and days 0–7 after vaccination in the phase 1/2 trial. For injection site erythema and swelling, grade 3 corresponded to a diameter >100 mm. For fever, grade 3 corresponded to a temperature >39°C. For all other reactions, grade 3 corresponded to reactions that prevented normal, everyday activities. Grade 4 events were not defined in these trials.

b Intervention was a single dose of GSK Arexvy (120µg antigen + AS01E adjuvant, 1 dose IM).

c All events within 4 days of injection.

d All events within 7 days of injection.

e Severe reactogenicity events were defined as grade 3 or higher injection site reaction (pain at injection site, redness and swelling) or systemic reaction (fever, fatigue/tiredness, headache, nausea, muscle pain, joint pain, vomiting, diarrhea, and other systemic event) during days 0–7 after vaccination. For injection site redness and swelling, grade 3 corresponded to a diameter >10.0 cm from e-diary or severe grade from adverse event case report form. For fever, grade 3 corresponded to a temperature >38.9°C from e-diary or severe grade from adverse event case report form. For all other reactions, grade 3 corresponded to reactions that prevented normal, everyday activities. Grade 4 event is only applicable to fever >40℃.

f Intervention was a single dose of Pfizer Abrysvo (120µg antigen, 1 dose IM).

g Pooled estimate using data from all studies for this outcome generated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect model.

Table 5: Summary of Evidence for Outcomes of Interest

Table 5a Summary of Evidence for Outcomes of Interest in Adults Aged ≥75 Years

Table 5a Summary of Evidence for Outcomes of Interest in Adults Aged ≥75 Years
Outcome Importance Included in profile Certainty
RSV LRTD Important Yes High
Medically attended RSV LRTD Critical Yes Moderate
Hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness Critical Yes Low
Severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen/respiratory support Important Yes Very low
Death due to RSV respiratory illness Important No Unable to evaluate
Serious adverse events Critical Yes Moderate
Inflammatory neurologic events Critical Yes Very low
Reactogenicity (grade ≥3) Important Yes Low

Table 5b: Summary of Evidence for Outcomes of Interest in Adults Aged 60–74 Years at Increased Risk of Severe RSV Disease

Table 5b: Summary of Evidence for Outcomes of Interest in Adults Aged 60–74 Years at Increased Risk of Severe RSV Disease
Outcome Importance Included in profile Certainty
RSV LRTD Important Yes High
Medically attended RSV LRTD Critical Yes High
Hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness Critical Yes Low
Severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen/respiratory support Important Yes Very low
Death due to RSV respiratory illness Important No Unable to evaluate
Serious adverse events Critical Yes Moderate
Inflammatory neurologic events Critical Yes Very low
Reactogenicity (grade ≥3) Important Yes Low

Table 6: Grade Summary of Findings

Table 6a: Grade Summary of Findings Table in Adults aged ≥75 years

Table 6a: Grade Summary of Findings Table in Adults aged ≥75 years
Certainty assessment № of patients Effect Certainty Importance
№ of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations RSV Vaccine No vaccine Relative
(95% CI)
Absolute
(95% CI)
RSV LRTD
2 randomized trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none 9/5564a 36/5551b Rate ratio 0.31
(0.15 to 0.63)c
d ⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Important
Medically attended RSV LRTD
2 randomized trials not serious not serious seriouse not serious none 14/15360f 75/15402g Rate ratio 0.23
(0.13 to 0.42)c
367 fewer per 100,000 patient(s) per RSV season
(from 276 fewer to 414 fewer)i
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
Critical
0.48%h
Hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness
2 randomized trials not serious not serious seriouse seriousj none 2/30519k 9/30572l Rate ratio 0.24
(0.05 to 1.13)c
239 fewer per 100,000 patient(s) per RSV season
(from 298 fewer to 41 more)n
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Critical
0.31%m
Severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen/respiratory support
2 randomized trials not serious seriouso seriouse seriousj none 2/30519p 6/30572l Rate ratio 0.37
(0.07 to 1.89)c
183 fewer per 100,000 patient(s) per RSV season
(from 270 fewer to 258 more)r
⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Important
0.29%q
Death due to RSV respiratory illness
2 randomized trials 0/23041s 0/28107t not estimableu not estimableu - Important
Serious adverse events
4 randomized trials not serious not serious seriouse not serious none 1034/31191 (3.3%) 1019/30939 (3.3%) RR 1.01
(0.93 to 1.10)v
33 more per 100,000
(from 231 fewer to 330 more)w
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
Critical
Inflammatory neuropathy
4 randomized trials not serious not serious seriouse very seriousx none 2/31192 (0.0%) 0/30939 (0.0%) RR 1.76
(0.29 to 10.77)v
y ⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Critical
Reactogenicity (grade >=3)
4 randomized trials not serious not seriousz seriouse  seriousj none 73/4655 (1.6%) 33/4469 (0.7%) RR 1.92
(0.78 to 4.70)v
644 more per 100,000
(from 154 fewer to 2,590 more)w
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Important
  1. 7,358 person-years of observation.
  2. 8,416 person-years of observation.
  3. Pooled rate ratio and the corresponding 95% CIs were calculated as 1- vaccine efficacy observed in the manufacturers’ phase 3 clinical trials for the specified outcome using all available follow-up time. The input vaccine efficacy was calculated by CDC using reported case counts and person-time without adjustment for covariates.
  4. An absolute effect could not be calculated for this outcome because there were no reliable data to estimate the true baseline rate of this outcome in the general population. The baseline rate captured in the placebo arm of the trial was felt to underestimate the true population-based incidence due to atypical RSV burden and seasonality during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were also no estimates of rate of ≥3 symptom RSV LRTD available in the literature.
  5. Serious concern for indirectness due to inclusion of adults aged 60–74 years.
  6. 20,774 person-years of observation.
  7. 25,706 person-years of observation.
  8. This represents a control rate of 476 cases of medically attended RSV LRTI with ≥3 symptoms per 100,000 adults aged ≥60 years per RSV season (196 cases of medically attended RSV illness over one RSV season per 10,000 adults aged ≥60 years with chronic cardiopulmonary conditions [as a proxy for those 75 years and older], of which 24.3% are RSV LRTI with ≥3 symptoms). Control rate data are from Belongia EA, et al. Clinical Features, Severity, and Incidence of RSV Illness During 12 Consecutive Seasons in a Community Cohort of Adults ≥60 Years Old. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 27;5(12):ofy316).
  9. For calculation of absolute effect, the baseline number of events was not taken from the placebo arm of the trial given concerns that the baseline captured in the trial underestimated the true population-based incidence. Instead the calculation uses the control rate described in footnote h.
  10. Serious concern for imprecision due to the confidence intervals containing measures of absolute risk for which different policy decisions might be considered.
  11. 39,323 person-years of observation.
  12. 41,962 person-years of observation.
  13. This represents a control rate of 314 cases of RSV-associated hospitalization over one RSV season per 100,000 adults aged 75 and older. Control rate data are unpublished data from CDC’s RSV-NET. Available here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2024-06-26-28/08-RSV-Adult-Hutton-508.pdf.
  14. For calculation of absolute effect, the baseline number of events was not taken from the placebo arm of the trial given concerns that the baseline captured in the trial underestimated the true population-based incidence. Instead the calculation uses the control rate described in footnote m.
  15. Serious concern for inconsistency because the point estimates between the studies differed substantially, although the confidence intervals overlapped.
  16. 39,322 person-years of observation.
  17. This represents a control rate of 290 cases of severe RSV illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support per 100,000 adults aged ≥60 years per RSV season (196 cases of medically attended RSV illness over one RSV season per 10,000 adults aged ≥60 years with chronic cardiopulmonary conditions [as a proxy for those 75 years and older], of which 14.8% require supplemental oxygen in the 28 days after medical attention). Control rate data are from Belongia EA, et al. Clinical Features, Severity, and Incidence of RSV Illness During 12 Consecutive Seasons in a Community Cohort of Adults ≥60 Years Old. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 27;5(12):ofy316
  18. For calculation of absolute effect, the baseline number of events was not taken from the placebo arm of the trial given concerns that the baseline captured in the trial underestimated the true population-based incidence. Instead the calculation uses the control rate described in footnote q.
  19. 34,167 person-years of observation.
  20. 43,696 person-years of observation.
  21. Measures of relative and absolute effect could not be estimated due to zero events.
  22. Pooled relative risk estimates were independently calculated using counts of events and participants in the pivotal phase 3 trials, as well as from earlier the phase 1/2 trials.
  23. For calculation of absolute effect, the baseline number of events was taken from the rates observed in the placebo arm.
  24. Very serious concern for imprecision due to the width of the confidence interval containing estimates for which different policy decisions might be considered and fragility in the estimate.
  25. Absolute risk was unable to be calculated due to zero events in the placebo arm and no reliable data to estimate the true baseline rate of this outcome in the general population.
  26. Differences in the risk of grade ≥3 reactogenicity between GSK and Pfizer vaccines are not unexpected given that one of the products is adjuvanted and one is not; therefore inconsistency was felt to be not serious, as we would expect that the risk of grade ≥3 reactogenicity is different between the vaccine products.

Table 6b: Grade Summary of Findings Table in Adults aged 60–74 Years at Increased Risk of Severe RSV Disease

Table 6b: Grade Summary of Findings Table in Adults aged 60–74 Years at Increased Risk of Severe RSV Disease
Certainty assessment № of patients Effect Certainty Importance
№ of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations RSV Vaccine No vaccine Relative
(95% CI)
Absolute
(95% CI)
RSV LRTD
2 randomized trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none 26/19516a 113/21340b Rate ratio 0.27
(0.18 to 0.41)c
d ⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Important
Medically attended RSV LRTD
2 randomized trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none 16/19524e 67/21372f Rate ratio 0.27
(0.16 to 0.47)c
347 fewer per 100,000 patient(s) per RSV season
(from 252 to 400 fewer)h
⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Critical
0.48%g
Hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness
2 randomized trials not serious not serious seriousi seriousj none 2/30519k 9/41962l Rate ratio 0.24
(0.05 to 1.13)c
150 per 100,000 patient(s) per RSV season
(from 188 fewer to 26 more)n
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Critical
0.20%m
Severe RSV respiratory illness requiring supplemental oxygen/respiratory support
2 randomized trials not serious seriouso seriousi seriousj none 2/30519p 6/30572l Rate ratio 0.37
(0.07 to 1.89)c
183 per 100,000 patient(s) per RSV season
(from 270 fewer to 258 more)r
⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Important
0.29%q
Death due to RSV respiratory illness
2 randomized trials 0/23041s 0/28107t not estimableu not estimableu - Important
Serious adverse events
4 randomized trials not serious not serious seriousi not serious none 1034/31191 (3.3%) 1019/30939 (3.3%) RR 1.01
(0.93 to 1.10)v
33 more per 100,000
(from 231 fewer to 330 more)w
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
Critical
Inflammatory neuropathy
4 randomized trials not serious not serious seriousi very seriousx none 2/31191 (0.0%) 0/30939 (0.0%) RR 1.76
(0.29 to 10.77)v
y ⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Critical
Reactogenicity (grade >=3)
4 randomized trials not serious not seriousz seriousi  seriousj none 73/4655 (1.6%) 33/4469 (0.7%) RR 1.92
(0.78 to 4.70)v
644 more per 100,000
(from 154 fewer to 2,590 more)w
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Important
  1. 19,516 person-years of observation.
  2. 21,340 person-years of observation.
  3. Pooled rate ratio and the corresponding 95% CIs were calculated as 1- vaccine efficacy observed in the manufacturers’ phase 3 clinical trials for the specified outcome using all available follow-up time. The input vaccine efficacy was calculated by CDC using reported case counts and person-time without adjustment for covariates.
  4. An absolute effect could not be calculated for this outcome because there were no reliable data to estimate the true baseline rate of this outcome in the general population. The baseline rate captured in the placebo arm of the trial was felt to underestimate the true population-based incidence due to atypical RSV burden and seasonality during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were also no estimates of rate of ≥3 symptom RSV LRTD available in the literature.
  5. 19,524 person-years of observation.
  6. 21,372 person-years of observation.
  7. This represents a control rate of 476 cases of medically attended RSV LRTI with ≥3 symptoms per 100,000 adults aged ≥60 years per RSV season (196 cases of medically attended RSV illness over one RSV season per 10,000 adults aged ≥60 years with chronic cardiopulmonary conditions, of which 24.3% are RSV LRTI with ≥3 symptoms). Control rate data are from Belongia EA, et al. Clinical Features, Severity, and Incidence of RSV Illness During 12 Consecutive Seasons in a Community Cohort of Adults ≥60 Years Old. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 27;5(12):ofy316).
  8. For calculation of absolute effect, the baseline number of events was not taken from the placebo arm of the trial given concerns that the baseline captured in the trial underestimated the true population-based incidence. Instead the calculation uses the control rate described in footnote g.
  9. Serious concern for indirectness as this outcome was assessed for all adults 60-74 years, not only those at increased risk of severe RSV disease.
  10. Serious concern for imprecision due to the confidence intervals containing measures of absolute risk estimates for which different policy decisions might be considered.
  11. 39,323 person-years of observation.
  12. 41,962 person-years of observation.
  13. This represents a control rate of 198 cases of RSV-associated hospitalization over one RSV season per 100,000 adults aged 60-74 at increased risk of severe RSV disease. Control rate data are unpublished data from CDC’s RSV-NET with at least one condition among: COPD, asthma, CAD, diabetes, obesity (>40 kg/m2), or CKD. Available here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2024-06-26-28/08-RSV-Adult-Hutton-508.pdf.
  14. For calculation of absolute effect, the baseline number of events was not taken from the placebo arm of the trial given concerns that the baseline captured in the trial underestimated the true population-based incidence. Instead the calculation uses the control rate described in footnote m.
  15. Serious concern for inconsistency because the point estimates between the studies differed substantially, although the confidence intervals overlapped.
  16. 39,322 person-years of observation
  17. This represents a control rate of 290 cases of severe RSV illness requiring supplemental oxygen or other respiratory support per 100,000 adults aged ≥60 years per RSV season (196 cases of medically attended RSV illness over one RSV season per 10,000 adults aged ≥60 years, of which 14.8% require supplemental oxygen in the 28 days after medical attention). Control rate data are from Belongia EA, et al. Clinical Features, Severity, and Incidence of RSV Illness During 12 Consecutive Seasons in a Community Cohort of Adults ≥60 Years Old. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 27;5(12):ofy316).
  18. For calculation of absolute effect, the baseline number of events was not taken from the placebo arm of the trial given concerns that the baseline captured in the trial underestimated the true population-based incidence. Instead the calculation uses the control rate described in footnote q.
  19. 34,167 person-years of observation.
  20. 43,696 person-years of observation.
  21. Measures of relative and absolute effect could not be estimated due to zero events.
  22. Pooled relative risk estimates were independently calculated using counts of events and participants in the pivotal phase 3 trials, as well as from earlier the phase 1/2 trials.
  23. For calculation of absolute effect, the baseline number of events was taken from the rates observed in the placebo arm.
  24. Very serious concern for imprecision due to fragility of the estimate, adjustment of relative risk for zero events observed, and confidence interval containing estimates for which different policy decisions might be considered.
  25. Absolute risk was unable to be calculated due to zero events in the placebo arm and no reliable data to estimate the true baseline rate of this outcome in the general population.
  26. Differences in the risk of grade ≥3 reactogenicity between GSK and Pfizer vaccines are not unexpected given that one of the products is adjuvanted and one is not; therefore inconsistency was felt to be not serious, as we would expect that the risk of grade ≥3 reactogenicity is different between the vaccine products.

Appendix 1. Studies Included in the Review of Evidence

Appendix 1. Studies Included in the Review of Evidence
Last name first author, Publication year Study design Country (or more detail, if needed) Age (measure central tendency – mean/SD; median/IQR; range) Total population N Intervention N comparison Outcomes Funding source
Papi A, et al. 2023; Ison MG, et al. 2024; plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer2,3,5 RCT Phase 3 Australia, Belgium, Canada, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom, United States ≥60 years
Mean: 69.5 years (SD: 6.5 years)
24,973 12,470 12,503 RSV Lower Respiratory Tract Disease (LRTD)

Medically attended RSV LRTD
Hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness
Severe RSV respiratory illness requiring oxygen/respiratory support
Death due to RSV respiratory illness
Serious adverse events
Inflammatory neurologic events
Reactogenicity (grade ≥3)

GSK
Leroux-Roels I, et al. 2022 plus additional unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer4,5 RCT Phase 1/2 Belgium, United States Vaccine arm (Phase 3 formulation)
Mean: 67.6 years (SD: 5.2 years)
Placebo arm
Mean 68.1 years (SD: 5.7 years)
201 (phase 3 formulation and placebo) 100 101 Serious adverse events

Inflammatory neurologic events

Reactogenicity (grade ≥3)

GSK
Walsh EE, et. al. 2023, plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer6,8 RCT Phase 3 Argentina, Canada, Finland, Japan, Netherlands, South Africa, United States ≥60 years
Mean: 68.3 years (SD: 6.14 years)
36,862 18,574 18,288 RSV LRTD

Medically attended RSV LRTD

Hospitalization for RSV respiratory illness

Severe RSV respiratory illness requiring oxygen/respiratory support

Death due to RSV respiratory illness

Serious adverse events

Inflammatory neurologic events

Reactogenicity (grade ≥3)

Pfizer
Falsey et al., 2022, plus unpublished data provided directly from the manufacturer7,8 RCT Phase 1/2 United States 65–85 years 95 48 47 Serious adverse events

Inflammatory neurologic events

Reactogenicity (grade ≥3)

Pfizer

Appendix 2. Databases and strategies used for systematic review

Appendix 2. Databases and strategies used for systematic review
Database Strategy
Medline
(OVID)
1946-
  1. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines/
  2. ((RSV* OR Respiratory Syncytial Virus*) ADJ5 (vaccin* OR immuni?ation* OR mRNA)).ti,ab,kf,hw.
  3. (Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/pc AND (vaccin* OR immuni?ation* OR mRNA))
  4. 1 OR 2 OR 3
  5. exp adult/
  6. (adult* OR elder* OR senior* OR aged OR geriatric*).ti,ab,kf,hw.
  7. 5 OR 6
  8. Vaccine efficacy/ OR exp "Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions"/
  9. Safe* OR effective* OR efficacy OR adverse OR ae.fs
  10. 8 OR 9
  11. 4 AND 7 AND 10

 

Embase
(OVID)
1974-
  1. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine/
  2. ((RSV* OR Respiratory Syncytial Virus*) ADJ5 (vaccin* OR immunization*)).ti,ab,kf,hw.
  3. (Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection/pc AND (vaccin* OR immuni?ation*))
  4. 1 OR 2 OR 3
  5. exp adult/
  6. (adult* OR elder* OR senior* OR aged OR geriatric*).ti,ab,kf,hw.
  7. 5 OR 6
  8. Vaccine efficacy/ OR drug safety/ OR drug tolerability/
  9. Safe* OR effective* OR efficacy OR adverse OR ae.fs
  10. 8 OR 9
  11. 4 AND 7 AND 10

 

Cochrane Library #1 [mh "Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines"]

#2 ((RSV* OR "Respiratory Syncytial Virus" OR "Respiratory Syncytial Viruses") NEAR/5 (vaccin* OR immuni?ation* OR mRNA)):ti,ab,kw

#3 ([mh "Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections"] AND (vaccin* OR immuni?ation* OR mRNA))

#4 #1 OR #2 OR #3

#5 [mh ^adult]

#6 (adult* OR elder* OR senior* OR aged OR geriatric*):ti,ab,kw

#7 #5 OR #6

#8 [mh "Vaccine efficacy"] OR [mh "Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions"]

#9 (Safe* OR effective* OR efficacy OR adverse):ti,ab,kw

#10 #8 OR #9

#11 #4 AND #7 AND #10

CINAHL
(EbscoHost)
S1 (MH "Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines")

S2 ((RSV* OR "Respiratory Syncytial Virus" OR "Respiratory Syncytial Viruses") N5 (vaccin* OR immuni?ation* OR mRNA))

S3 ((MH "Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections") AND (vaccin* OR immuni?ation* OR mRNA))

S4 S1 OR S2 OR S3

S5 (MH adult+)

S6 (adult* OR elder* OR senior* OR aged OR geriatric*)

S7 S5 OR S6

S8 (MH "Vaccine efficacy") OR (MH "Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions")

S9 (Safe* OR effective* OR efficacy OR adverse)

S10 S8 OR S9

S11 S4 AND S7 AND S10

Exclude Medline records

Scopus TITLE-ABS-KEY((RSV OR "Respiratory Syncytial Virus*") AND (vaccin* OR immuni?ation* OR mRNA)) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY(adult* OR elder* OR senior* OR aged OR geriatric*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY(Safe* OR effective* OR efficacy OR adverse) AND NOT INDEX(medline)
Clinicaltrials.gov Respiratory Syncytial Virus| Adult, Older Adult |Completed