Notice to Readers: Caution Regarding Testing for Lyme Disease
CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have become aware of commercial laboratories that conduct testing
for Lyme disease by using assays whose accuracy and clinical usefulness have not been adequately established. These tests include urine antigen tests, immunofluorescent staining for cell wall--deficient forms of
Borrelia burgdorferi, and lymphocyte transformation tests. In addition, some laboratories perform polymerase chain reaction tests for
B. burgdorferi DNA on inappropriate specimens such as blood and urine or interpret Western blots using criteria that have not been validated and published in peer-reviewed scientific literature. These
inadequately validated tests and criteria also are being used to
evaluate patients in Canada and Europe, according to reports from the National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada; the British Columbia Centres for Disease Control, Canada; the German National Reference Center for Borreliae;
and the Health Protection Agency Lyme Borreliosis Unit of the United Kingdom.
In the United States, FDA has cleared 70 serologic assays to aid in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. Recommendations for
the use and interpretation of serologic tests have been published previously
(1). Initial testing should use an enzyme
immunoassay (EIA) or immunofluorescent assay (IFA); specimens yielding positive or equivocal results should be tested further by using
a standardized Western immunoblot assay. Specimens negative by a sensitive EIA or IFA do not need further testing.
Similar assays and recommendations are used in Canada
(2). In the European Union, a minimum standard for commercial
diagnostic kits is provided by Conformité Européene (CE) marking; application and interpretation guidelines appropriate for
Europe have been published (3,4).
Health-care providers are reminded that a diagnosis of Lyme disease should be made after evaluation of a patient's
clinical presentation and risk for exposure to infected ticks, and, if indicated, after the use of validated laboratory tests. Patients
are encouraged to ask their physicians whether their testing for Lyme disease was performed using validated methods and
whether results were interpreted using appropriate guidelines.
Consensus Conference on Lyme Disease. Can Dis Wkly Rep 1991; 17:63--70.
Wilske B, Zöller L, Brade V, et al. MIQ 12 Lyme-Borreliose. Qualitätsstandards in der mikrobiologisch-infektiologischen Diagnostik.
Munich, Germany: Urban & Fischer Verlag; 2000;1--59. Guidelines available in English at http://nrz-borrelien.lmu.de/miq-lyme/index.html.
Robertson J, Guy E, Andrews N, et al. A European multicenter study of immunoblotting in serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. J Clin
Microbiol 2000;38:2097--102.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are
provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply
endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content
of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of
the date of publication.
Disclaimer
All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text
into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version.
Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or
the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables.
An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents,
U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800.
Contact GPO for current prices.
**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to
mmwrq@cdc.gov.
