|
|
|||||||||
|
Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail. Self-Reported Use of Mammography and Insurance Status Among Women Aged greater than or equal to 40 Years -- United States, 1991-1992 and 1996-1997In the United States, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women and the second leading cause of cancer death (1). Lack of health insurance coverage often is an important financial barrier to seeking preventive health care such as mammography screenings (2,3). To assess mammography use and the impact of insurance status on mammography use, state-specific proportions of women aged greater than or equal to 40 years who reported receiving a mammogram during the preceding 2 years by insurance status were derived using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for 1991-1992 and 1996-1997. This report describes the results of this analysis, which indicate that the percentage of women reporting having had a screening mammogram during the previous 2 years increased, but women with insurance were substantially more likely than women without insurance to have had a mammogram. Forty-six states and the District of Columbia (DC) participated in BRFSS surveys during 1991-1992 and 1996-1997. * Using a multistage sampling design and random-digit dialing, each state conducted monthly telephone interviews sampling noninstitutionalized adults (aged greater than or equal to 18 years) (3,4). Annual data were weighted to the age, sex, and race distribution of each state's adult population using 1994 census or intercensal estimates. Female respondents aged greater than or equal to 40 years were asked, "Have you ever had a mammogram?" If the respondent answered "yes," she was asked, "How long has it been since your last mammogram?" and "Was it part of a routine checkup, or was it because of a breast problem other than cancer, or was it because you had already had breast cancer?" Respondents also were asked, "Do you have any kind of health care coverage, including health insurance, prepaid plans such as HMOs, or government plans such as Medicare?" In the 1996 and 1997 surveys, respondents who answered "no" were asked to reconsider the question. For consistency between the surveys, this analysis categorized respondents in 1996 and 1997 who first answered "no" to the insurance question as uninsured, even if they answered "yes" when asked again; the increase in the percentage of persons insured based on "yes" responses on reconsideration of the question was less than 2%. Almost all women aged greater than or equal to 65 years have Medicare coverage (3). However, the aggregated results for all women aged greater than or equal to 40 years are presented because this format is consistent with prior analyses of trends in mammography coverage using data from the BRFSS and national objectives for breast cancer screening (5,6). To compensate for the potential affects of the resulting differences in age distributions between insured and uninsured women, estimates were age-adjusted to the age distribution of women in the 1994 BRFSS sample for participating states. The overall pooled age-adjusted proportion of women with insurance who reported having had a mammogram was 65.2% in 1991-1992 and 70.9% in 1996-1997; the proportion of women without insurance who reported having had a mammogram was 39.6% in 1991-1992 and 46.2% in 1996-1997. In each of the 46 states and DC in both 1991-1992 and 1996-1997, the prevalence of self-reported screening mammography use within the previous 2 years was higher among insured women than among uninsured women; uninsured women represented approximately 9% of the sample in 1996-1997 (Table_1). Among insured women, from 1991-1992 to 1996-1997, the age-adjusted proportion aged greater than or equal to 40 years who reported having had a mammogram during the preceding 2 years increased in 43 states. Increases in 26 states were statistically significant; the largest absolute increases in mammography use were in Mississippi (from 51.4% to 65.3%) and Alaska (from 63.9% to 76.4%). Mammography use decreased in three states (Minnesota, Vermont, and Washington), and DC, but the changes were not statistically significant. Among uninsured women, mammography use increased in 33 states; the increase was significant in six. The largest absolute increases were 31.0% in Alaska (from 33.8% to 64.8%) and 23.9% in New Jersey (from 23.7% to 47.6%). Although there were decreases in 14 states, the only statistically significant decrease was in New Hampshire (from 51.1% to 32.4%; p=0.047). Reported by the following BRFSS coordinators: J Cook, MBA, Alabama; P Owen, Alaska; B Bender, MBA, Arizona; J Senner, PhD, Arkansas; B Davis, PhD, California; M Leff, MSPH, Colorado; M Adams, MPH, Connecticut; F Breukelman, Delaware; C Mitchell, District of Columbia; S Hoecherl, Florida; L Martin, MS, Georgia; A Onaka, PhD, Hawaii; J Aydelotte, Idaho; B Steiner, MS, Illinois; K Horvath, Indiana; A Wineski, Iowa; M Perry, Kansas; K Asher, Kentucky; R Jiles, PhD, Louisiana; D Maines, Maine; A Weinstein, MA, Maryland; D Brooks, MPH, Massachusetts; H McGee, MPH, Michigan; N Salem, PhD, Minnesota; D Johnson, Mississippi; T Murayi, PhD, Missouri; P Feigley, PhD, Montana; M Metroka, Nebraska; E DeJan, MPH, Nevada; L Powers, MA, New Hampshire; G Boeselager, MS, New Jersey; W Honey, MPH, New Mexico; T Melnik, DrPH, New York; K Passaro, PhD, North Carolina; J Kaske, MPH, North Dakota; P Pullen, Ohio; N Hann, MPH, Oklahoma; J Grant-Worley, MS, Oregon; L Mann, Pennsylvania; J Hesser, PhD, Rhode Island; D Shepard, South Carolina; M Gildemaster, South Dakota; D Ridings, Tennessee; K Condon, Texas; R Giles, Utah; C Roe, MS, Vermont; L Redman, MPH, Virginia; K Wynkoop-Simmons, PhD, Washington; F King, West Virginia; P Imm, MS, Wisconsin; M Futa, MA, Wyoming. Epidemiology and Health Svcs Research Br, Div of Cancer Prevention and Control, and Health Care and Aging Studies Br, Div of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC. Editorial NoteEditorial Note: The findings in this report indicate that the percentage of women reporting having had a screening mammogram in the previous 2 years has increased over time, and this increase has been observed among both insured and uninsured women. However, women without insurance continue to be substantially less likely than women with insurance to have this procedure. These results underscore the importance of public health activities to increase access to breast and cervical cancer screening services for women who are medically underserved (7). If breast cancer mortality is to continue to decrease, then access to mammography for all women, particularly the uninsured, must be enhanced (8). The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, because the BRFSS is a telephone survey, women living in a household without a telephone (5% of U.S. households) are excluded (9). Second, the survey's self-reported data may not be consistent with reports of mammography use from medical records. However, studies comparing self-reports with medical records found that the error in self-reporting mammography use is not substantial enough to explain the differences seen in the analyses described in this report (10). Finally, the response rates within the BRFSS have dropped from 84.1% and 82.9% in 1991 and 1992, respectively, to 77.9% and 76.8% in 1996 and 1997, respectively. Because respondents may differ from nonrespondents, this increase in nonresponse could portend greater bias in later samples. This study indicates that lack of health insurance decreases the likelihood that a woman will receive a mammogram. This is an important finding given the efforts being made to reduce breast cancer mortality in this country, where a substantial proportion of women lack health insurance. The demonstrated efficacy of regular breast cancer screening with mammography suggests that efforts such as CDC's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, a comprehensive nationwide program administered through state health departments and American Indian/ Alaskan Native tribal organizations, could facilitate the early detection of breast cancer in underserved women. References
Arkansas, Kansas, Nevada, and Wyoming did not participate. Table_1 Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size. TABLE 1. Percentage of women aged >=40 years who reported having had a mammogram during the previous 2 years, by insurance status -- United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 1991-1992 and 1996-1997 * ============================================================================================================================== Insured Uninsured ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------- Sample size Percentage Percentage Sample size Percentage Percentage ----------------- 1991-1992 1996-1997 ---------------- 1991-1992 1996-1997 1991- 1996- ------------- ----------- 1991- 1996- ------------- -------------- State 1992 1997 % (SE+) % (SE) 1992 1997 % (SE) % (SE) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alabama 1,225 1,424 68.3 (1.5) 70.7 (1.4) 190 200 41.5 ( 4.3) 43.0 ( 5.1) Alaska 641 754 63.9 (2.8) 6.4& (2.4) 83 162 33.8 ( 8.1) 4.8& ( 5.2) Arizona 977 1,231 63.6 (2.2) 3.2& (2.2) 133 119 47.2 ( 4.5) 41.8 ( 7.0) California 1,764 2,370 72.0 (1.3) 74.1 (1.1) 185 263 43.1 ( 6.7) 45.9 ( 6.0) Colorado 997 1,128 68.7 (1.6) 71.7 (1.6) 85 80 42.9 ( 6.6) 30.5 ( 5.9) Connecticut 1,144 1,375 69.5 (1.6) 4.1& (1.4) 64 83 50.3 ( 7.3) 36.4 ( 7.4) Delaware 973 1,636 69.2 (1.7) 7.2& (1.3) 83 106 36.3 ( 6.8) 41.8 ( 5.4) District of Columbia 853 822 80.7 (1.7) 76.9 (1.7) 114 83 54.9 ( 5.2) 63.4 ( 6.7) Florida 1,581 2,356 65.4 (1.6) 7.3& (1.1) 207 294 39.0 ( 4.4) 43.6 ( 4.2) Georgia 1,017 1,383 64.0 (1.7) 0.9& (1.4) 139 105 44.7 ( 5.8) 0.2& ( 4.6) Hawaii 1,076 1,418 66.8 (1.8) 4.2& (1.4) 67 74 32.0 ( 5.8) 48.6 (10.7) Idaho 1,055 2,430 56.0 (1.8) 59.5 (1.3) 112 245 26.0 ( 4.0) 24.6 ( 4.3) Illinois 1,244 1,828 66.1 (1.7) 68.7 (1.3) 112 143 40.6 ( 5.7) 54.3 ( 5.1) Indiana 1,422 1,458 61.5 (1.5) 5.9& (1.5) 103 127 25.7 ( 4.6) 33.8 ( 6.7) Iowa 1,046 2,627 60.0 (1.9) 64.1 (1.2) 57 125 45.2 (10.2) 40.3 ( 8.0) Kentucky 1,264 2,695 55.8 (1.7) 8.0& (1.2) 183 223 31.8 ( 4.0) 33.3 ( 6.3) Louisiana 926 974 56.8 (1.9) 5.1& (1.8) 175 186 29.0 ( 5.3) 49.9& ( 5.6) Maine 744 1,132 68.1 (2.0) 72.5 (1.7) 52 106 42.8 ( 8.2) 39.4 ( 7.0) Maryland 1,172 2,899 75.0 (1.5) 78.5 (1.0) 88 195 42.9 ( 6.1) 56.8 ( 5.5) Massachusetts 781 1,081 71.8 (1.8) 76.1 (1.6) 43 66 39.8 ( 9.7) 62.6 ( 8.4) Michigan 1,440 1,605 68.5 (1.4) 5.1& (1.3) 89 98 45.2 ( 7.3) 50.1 ( 6.2) Minnesota 2,007 2,908 69.4 (1.2) 68.7 (1.0) 89 137 42.7 ( 6.8) 35.3 ( 4.8) Mississippi 1,013 1,114 51.4 (1.9) 5.3& (1.8) 148 128 35.6 ( 4.9) 39.8 ( 7.0) Missouri 938 1,172 63.7 (1.9) 66.4 (1.6) 115 110 35.1 ( 5.2) 43.2 ( 8.3) Montana 725 1,195 62.5 (2.1) 9.2& (1.5) 75 135 23.7 ( 5.1) 37.8& ( 4.6) Nebraska 993 1,755 55.7 (2.0) 4.5& (1.6) 48 94 36.6 ( 8.0) 45.2 (11.6) New Hampshire 845 982 70.6 (1.8) 73.5 (1.5) 54 64 51.1 ( 8.1) 32.4& ( 4.8) New Jersey 1,036 1,881 60.6 (1.8) 8.9& (1.3) 48 136 23.7 ( 7.9) 47.6& ( 5.9) New Mexico 587 902 64.0 (2.4) 69.1 (1.9) 128 164 34.1 ( 5.1) 41.1 ( 6.4) New York 1,221 2,448 64.4 (1.7) 3.9& (1.1) 98 184 35.2 ( 6.8) 45.0 ( 5.4) North Carolina 1,256 2,133 64.2 (1.7) 1.0& (1.2) 127 192 35.2 ( 5.0) 42.6 ( 4.6) North Dakota 1,105 1,222 65.6 (1.7) 1.1& (1.6) 60 88 29.2 ( 7.6) 27.5 ( 6.0) Ohio 790 1,715 60.4 (2.1) 69.8 (1.6) 56 120 46.9 ( 7.1) 56.4 ( 5.9) Oklahoma 931 1,235 57.9 (1.9) 4.8& (1.7) 157 147 29.2 ( 4.2) 26.7 ( 5.3) Oregon 2,094 2,084 70.3 (1.1) 73.3 (1.1) 183 160 42.0 ( 5.1) 37.6 ( 5.0) Pennsylvania 1,521 2,472 62.1 (1.5) 8.5& (1.1) 73 159 46.4 ( 7.7) 53.8 ( 5.5) Rhode Island 1,093 1,220 69.5 (1.6) 7.0& (1.5) 48 63 37.1 ( 7.7) 48.3 ( 8.8) South Carolina 1,258 1,352 64.2 (1.7) 1.5& (1.6) 177 155 43.2 ( 4.6) 54.4 ( 6.6) South Dakota 1,113 1,439 59.7 (1.7) 7.3& (1.5) 68 107 24.4 ( 5.4) 37.4 ( 7.6) Tennessee 1,588 2,167 60.4 (1.4) 6.5& (1.3) 174 179 36.9 ( 4.7) 45.8 ( 5.0) Texas 1,033 1,167 62.7 (1.8) 66.3 (1.7) 196 222 40.6 ( 5.0) 47.3 ( 4.9) Utah 944 1,606 62.9 (1.8) 64.6 (1.6) 71 150 35.8 ( 9.6) 21.8 ( 5.6) Vermont 1,038 1,813 69.6 (1.6) 69.2 (1.3) 96 168 35.1 ( 6.0) 50.0 ( 5.1) Virginia 931 1,752 65.6 (1.8) 0.5& (1.5) 101 206 48.7 ( 6.0) 47.0 ( 5.4) Washington 1,319 2,289 69.9 (1.5) 68.7 (1.1) 99 133 39.1 ( 6.7) 49.9 ( 7.4) West Virginia 1,664 1,783 60.1 (1.4) 9.1& (1.3) 232 196 31.2 ( 3.8) 43.4 ( 6.0) Wisconsin 803 1,402 64.7 (1.9) 67.4 (1.8) 31 84 60.8 ( 8.7) 50.3 ( 8.1) Pooled 53,188 77,834 65.2 (0.3) 0.9& (0.3) 5,116 6,764 39.6 ( 1.3) 46.2& ( 1.3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentages are age-adjusted to the distribution of the 1994 BRFSS sample. + Standard error. & Difference within insurance group between 1991-1992 and 1996-1997 is significant (p<0.05). Return to top. Disclaimer All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices. **Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.Page converted: 11/10/98 |
|||||||||
This page last reviewed 5/2/01
|