|
|
|||||||||
|
Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail. Diabetes During Pregnancy -- United States, 1993-1995Diabetes during pregnancy, whether pregestational (type 1 or type 2) or gestational, increases the risk for adverse maternal and infant outcomes (e.g., congenital anomalies, cesarean delivery, macrosomia, and future metabolic abnormalities) (1-3). Identification and careful management of diabetes during pregnancy can reduce poor maternal and infant outcomes (4-6). Diabetes prevalence and prenatal-care use varies among racial/ethnic groups and by maternal age and other characteristics (1,7,8). Higher than expected diabetes rates for women of childbearing age have been reported among many immigrant and other populations undergoing lifestyle changes (e.g., physical activity and diet) (1). This report summarizes an analysis of U.S. birth certificates during 1993-1995 to describe maternal diabetes and associated prenatal care among racial/ethnic groups and updates a previous report (7). U.S. birth certificate data for all resident singleton, live-born infants for 1993-1995 were combined to improve reliability of race/ethnicity-specific diabetes rates. Maternal characteristics included age at delivery, self-reported race/ethnicity, birthplace (defined as born within or outside the 50 states and the District of Columbia), the month that prenatal care was initiated, and whether diabetes was reported as a medical risk factor for the pregnancy. Maternal diabetes is reported on a checkbox on the birth certificate; however, the type of diabetes (pregestational or gestational) is not recorded. Data for Asian Indian, Korean, Samoan, and Vietnamese women were available for seven states (California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Washington). Age-adjusted diabetes rates were calculated to account for differences in the maternal age distributions of the racial/ethnic and birthplace groups. Age-adjusted rates were standardized to the U.S. maternal age distribution for 1993-1995 singleton live births. Rates with numerators less than 20 were not calculated because numbers were too small to provide stable estimates. Proxy measures of the possibility of adequate diabetes screening and treatment included 1) the proportion of mothers with diabetes who entered care after the first trimester as a measure of inadequate care for pregestational diabetes, and 2) the proportion of mothers who entered prenatal care in the eighth or ninth month (i.e., late care) or who received no prenatal care as a measure of inadequate or no screening or treatment. During 1993-1995, the maternal diabetes rate was 25.3 per 1000 women (Table_1). Prevalence rates by maternal race/ethnicity ranged from 56.1 for Asian Indian women to 19.3 for Korean women. Diabetes rates increased steadily with age from 8.3 per 1000 women aged less than 20 years to 65.6 for women aged 40-49 years. Age-adjusted rates were higher than unadjusted rates for American Indian, non-Hispanic black, Mexican, Puerto Rican, Hawaiian, and Samoan women and lower for Asian Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, Central and South American, Cuban, and non-Hispanic white women (7). Age-adjusted diabetes rates were highest among American Indian (52.4), Asian Indian (48.3), Puerto Rican (38.7), Hawaiian (32.6), and Filipino (32.0) women and lowest among Korean (16.1) and Vietnamese (19.5) women. Overall, mothers born outside the United States had a higher diabetes rate than U.S.-born women (unadjusted: 28.0 compared with 24.8; adjusted: 26.4 compared with 25.0) (Table_2). However, the effect of birthplace varied by race/ethnicity. Both before and after adjusting for age, diabetes rates were at least 25% greater among Asian Indian, Samoan, and non-Hispanic black women who were born outside the United States than among U.S.-born women; however, Japanese women born in the United States were more likely to have diabetes than those born outside the United States. Mothers with diabetes were more likely than mothers without diabetes to initiate prenatal care during the first trimester and less likely to initiate care during the eighth or ninth month of gestation or to receive no care, regardless of race/ethnicity (Table_3). Among mothers with diabetes, first-trimester initiation of care ranged from 59.0% among Samoan women to 90.4% of Cuban women. Among groups with the highest diabetes prevalence, the percentage of women with diabetes receiving care during the first trimester was 88.4% among Chinese, 85.6% among Filipino, 82.6% among Asian Indian, 77.1% among Puerto Rican, and 71.1% among American Indian women. An average of 105,122 mothers per year initiated prenatal care during the eighth or ninth month of pregnancy or received no care. Approximately half of these women were non-Hispanic black or Mexican. Among mothers with diabetes, 1.3% had late or no prenatal care, including 3.3% of American Indian, 2.9% of Central/South American, 2.8% of Asian Indian, 2.4% of Mexican, 2.3% of Puerto Rican, and 2.2% of black non-Hispanic women. Among Chinese and Filipino mothers with diabetes, 1.0% had late or no prenatal care. The percentage of mothers without diabetes who had late or no care ranged from 1.1% of Cuban mothers to 8.7% of Samoan mothers, including greater than or equal to 4% of American Indian, Mexican, non-Hispanic black, Puerto Rican, and Central and South American mothers. Late or no prenatal care among all mothers within these racial/ethnic groups was consistently higher regardless of maternal age. Reported by: EC Kieffer, PhD, Univ of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Reproductive Statistics Br, Div of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC. Editorial NoteEditorial Note: During 1993-1995, at least 2.5% of women who had a live-born infant had maternal diabetes, slightly higher than the 2.1% reported for 1989 (9). This difference may reflect, in part, improved reporting rather than an increase in diabetes prevalence. These data probably underestimate the true prevalence of diabetes during pregnancy (1,8-10). Prevalence estimates have been higher in most universally screened clinic populations (1). Prevalence underestimation may have been greater in populations that were less likely to receive diabetes screening because of younger maternal age distributions and/or late or no prenatal care. Selective screening based on maternal age does not detect a substantial number of diabetes cases. Age and racial/ethnic differences in the timing and adequacy of prenatal care also may have influenced reported prevalence rates because all but the most overt cases of gestational diabetes may have remained undetected in women who initiated prenatal care in the eighth or ninth month of pregnancy or who received no care. Preconception counseling and treatment is recommended for all women with pregestational diabetes. Screening to detect gestational diabetes is recommended during weeks 24-28 of pregnancy, followed by treatment during the remainder of pregnancy and postpartum follow-up (4,6). Initiation of prenatal care after the first trimester precludes adequate treatment of women with pregestational diabetes, and late or no prenatal care minimizes adequate screening and treatment of gestational diabetes. Among mothers with diabetes, approximately 20% of non-Hispanic black, Hispanic (except Cuban), American Indian, Samoan, and Hawaiian women initiated care after the first trimester. Diabetes prevalence increased with maternal age regardless of race/ethnicity. Both older age and increased screening of older mothers may contribute to the age-associated rate increase. The older childbearing ages of Filipino and Chinese women, compared with the reference population, accounts for their lower adjusted rates. In comparison, the age-adjusted diabetes rate for Asian Indian women remained substantially higher than the rate for all other groups despite their older maternal age distribution. Differences in childbearing age distributions by birthplace may account for some of the variation in diabetes rates between U.S.-born women and those born elsewhere. U.S.-born women generally have younger childbearing ages than women born elsewhere. However, diabetes rate differences by birthplace were not solely attributable to differing age distributions among most ethnic groups. The findings in this report are limited by the inability to distinguish between pregestational and gestational diabetes on birth certificates. The inclusion of such data on birth certificates is being considered. Recent studies suggest that the prevalence of diabetes among women of childbearing age is increasing in the United States (10). Increasing immigration among populations with high rates of type 2 diabetes, and the impact of acculturation on these risks (1), underscores the importance of national surveillance for diabetes prevalence during pregnancy (7-9). Identifying and monitoring the prevalence of pregestational diabetes may assist in targeting prenatal care efforts aimed at preventing adverse outcomes that may occur when glucose is inadequately controlled early in pregnancy (2,4,6). Timely diabetes screening is essential for appropriate identification and treatment of gestational diabetes (4,5). Increased outreach efforts to provide care to the populations least likely to obtain care and accurate recording of diabetes and prenatal care use on the birth certificate should contribute to improvements in diabetes surveillance and improved pregnancy outcomes. References
Table_1 Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size. TABLE 1. Number and rate * of diabetes during pregnancy, by race/ethnicity and age of mother -- United States, 1993-1995 =================================================================================================================================== Age (yrs) of mother Total ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- Race/Ethnicity No. + <20 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-49 Unadjusted Age-adjusted & --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-Hispanic White 6,996,046 10.0 17.8 24.5 30.3 41.3 56.1 25.3 24.3 Black 1,770,102 6.5 14.0 26.1 40.3 57.4 81.1 22.6 27.5 Hispanic Mexican 1,331,361 6.4 12.5 23.7 41.9 63.8 88.8 22.8 27.5 Puerto Rican 161,065 8.8 21.4 36.3 56.9 79.7 107.7 31.6 38.7 Cuban 35,148 @ 14.7 23.6 30.2 40.4 53.4 24.9 22.7 Central or South American 271,639 5.6 11.4 21.7 35.8 56.4 79.9 25.4 24.3 American Indian/ 108,982 12.9 26.8 49.5 77.3 110.2 150.6 43.9 52.4 Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Chinese 77,359 @ 11.5 26.7 40.4 60.8 75.1 39.1 27.3 Japanese 25,885 @ 20.3 16.9 26.3 37.4 67.4 26.8 21.6 Hawaiian 16,982 11.4 16.8 33.3 47.5 67.1 @ 28.9 32.6 Filipino 88,487 8.0 16.2 28.8 47.5 69.5 100.0 39.8 32.0 Asian Indian ** 31,574 @ 26.0 45.2 70.5 109.9 108.0 56.1 48.3 Korean ** 24,918 @ 9.0 13.3 22.9 31.0 48.6 19.3 16.1 Samoan ** 4,855 @ @ 27.4 42.4 69.8 @ 25.7 28.7 Vietnamese ** 34,140 @ 6.5 16.6 34.6 41.4 70.8 24.3 19.5 Total ++ 11,384,926 8.3 16.3 25.1 33.8 47.4 65.6 25.3 -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Per 1000 singleton live-born infants in specified population. + Women for whom diabetes status was reported. & Directly standardized to the aggregate population of all race/ethnicities. @ Numbers were too small for meaningful analysis. ** Data available for seven states (California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Washington). ++ Includes races other than those listed. =================================================================================================================================== Return to top. Table_2 Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size. TABLE 2. Number and rate * of diabetes for women born in the 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC) and for women born elsewhere, by race/ethnicity -- United States, 1993-1995 f===================================================================================================== Women born in 50 states and DC Women born elsewhere ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted Race/Ethnicity No. + rate rate No. + rate rate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-Hispanic White 6,653,662 25.2 24.3 332,677 27.2 23.0 Black 1,618,276 21.2 26.6 143,659 39.5 33.4 Hispanic Mexican 494,906 23.2 31.1 834,834 22.5 25.7 Puerto Rican 96,380 28.0 36.2 64,137 37.0 41.4 Cuban 11,945 23.0 24.3 23,181 25.8 21.4 Central or South American 18,347 17.6 21.3 252,773 26.0 24.3 American Indian/ Alaskan Native 104,322 44.0 53.0 4,442 43.0 42.1 Asian/Pacific Islander Chinese 6,914 39.1 28.6 70,171 39.0 27.1 Japanese 12,175 35.3 27.7 13,681 19.3 15.6 Hawaiian 16,568 28.8 32.7 410 & 33.2 Filipino 13,771 26.8 29.9 74,566 42.2 32.0 Asian Indian @ 3,627 38.3 34.0 27,841 58.5 50.3 Korean @ 844 & & 24,023 19.1 16.1 Samoan @ 1,845 15.2 17.7 3,005 32.3 31.0 Vietnamese @ 351 & & 33,745 24.3 19.4 Total ** 9,280,027 24.8 25.0 2,078,873 28.0 26.4 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Per 1000 singleton live-born infants in specified population. + Women for whom place of birth and diabetes status were reported. & Numbers were too small for meaningful analysis. @ Data were available for seven states (California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Washington). ** Includes races other than those listed. ===================================================================================================== Return to top. Table_3 Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size. TABLE 3. Percentage distribution of month prenatal care began and annual average number of women with late, inadequate, or no prenatal care, by race/ethnicity and diabetes status of mother -- United States, 1993-1995 ============================================================================================================================================== Average no. 1-3 months 4-7 months 8-9 months or no care of mothers Average no. of ------------------- ------------------- ---------------------- per year with mothers per year With Without With Without With Without late or with inadequate Race/Ethnicity No. * diabetes diabetes diabetes diabetes diabetes diabetes no care + or no care & --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-Hispanic White 6,987,365 89.2 86.2 10.1 12.3 0.8 1.5 35,233 319,333 Black 173,029 77.3 67.9 20.5 26.6 2.2 5.5 31,539 183,867 Hispanic Mexican 1,313,659 72.0 66.9 25.6 27.6 2.4 5.6 24,047 144,495 Puerto Rican 155,355 77.1 71.6 20.6 24.5 2.3 4.0 2,023 14,627 Cuban 34,927 90.4 89.3 8.7 9.6 @ 1.1 132 1,241 Central or South American 263,138 71.8 71.0 25.3 25.0 2.9 4.0 3,482 25,452 American Indian/ Alaskan Native 108,831 71.1 64.7 25.6 29.1 3.3 6.2 2,111 12,705 Asian/Pacific Islander Chinese 76,028 88.4 85.4 10.5 13.0 1.1 1.7 415 3,681 Japanese 25,429 90.2 88.6 9.1 10.0 @ 1.4 115 961 Hawaiian 16,373 79.8 74.3 19.6 22.4 @ 3.3 175 1,392 Filipino 87,176 85.6 80.3 13.3 17.5 1.0 2.3 641 5,671 Asian Indian ** 30,675 82.6 81.5 14.6 16.0 2.8 2.5 261 1,888 Korean ** 24,111 80.8 79.8 17.7 17.7 @ 2.6 203 1,623 Samoan ** 4,673 59.0 56.1 36.1 35.2 @ 8.7 134 682 Vietnamese ** 33,344 85.1 81.4 13.1 16.2 @ 2.5 272 2,061 Total ++ 11,286,002 84.3 79.9 14.4 17.3 1.3 2.8 105,122 751,673 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Women for whom month prenatal care began and diabetes status were reported. + Care beginning in the eighth or ninth month of pregnancy or no care. & Care beginning after the third month of pregnancy or no care. @ Numbers were too small for meaningful analysis. ** Data available for seven states (California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Washington). ++ Includes races other than those listed. ============================================================================================================================================== Return to top. Disclaimer All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices. **Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.Page converted: 10/05/98 |
|||||||||
This page last reviewed 5/2/01
|