![]() ![]() | ||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
Weekly |
![]() |
![]() |
January 19, 1990 /39(2);22-24,29-30 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail. Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Update: Ebola-Related Filovirus Infection in Nonhuman Primates and Interim Guidelines for Handling Nonhuman Primates during Transit and QuarantineIn November 1989, infections caused by a filovirus closely related to Ebola virus were detected in cynomolgus (Macaca fascicularis) monkeys imported from the Philippines and held in a primate quarantine facility in Virginia (1). One hundred forty-nine persons who came in contact with infected animals or the blood or tissues of these animals were placed under surveillance for 21 days after their last known exposure, and all were tested for Ebola virus antibody. Active surveillance was discontinued December 25. No illness compatible with that known to be caused by Ebola virus has occurred among these persons, and none had antibody to Ebola virus. Twelve nonhuman primates in two of 12 holding rooms in the Virginia facility were infected; these and all remaining animals in the facility were euthanized, and the building was decontaminated. Extensive investigation at transit points in Amsterdam and New York did not implicate cross-infection of the monkeys by African primates. In December, a telephone survey of 40 other U.S. primate importers identified another shipment of cynomolgus monkeys that had arrived in Pennsylvania from the Philippines on November 28 and in which a number of unexplained deaths had occurred shortly after arrival. An Ebola-related filovirus was isolated from liver tissue of one of these animals. The specific geographic origin within the Philippines of these animals is being identified, and active surveillance has been initiated at the facility in Pennsylvania to establish whether the virus has spread to other groups of monkeys or to human contacts. No unusual illnesses in staff of the facility have been reported. Animals currently quarantined are being tested for serologic evidence of Ebola virus infection. Inspection of the four major holding facilities in the Philippines, including the facility that had supplied the monkeys in Virginia, did not identify unusual illness compatible with Ebola virus disease in either workers or nonhuman primates. The infected animals had been captured from widely separated remote areas. Serologic and virologic studies of animals and workers are under way in these and other facilities in the Philippines. Reported by: RK Miller, MD, Fairfax Health District; JY Baumgardner, MAS, CW Armstrong, MD, SR Jenkins, VMD, CD Woolard, MPH, GB Miller, Jr, MD, State Epidemiologist, Virginia State Dept of Health. GG Wrigley, Buckshire Corporation, Perkasie; LD Polk, MD, Bucks County Health Dept; DR Tavris, MD, State Epidemiologist, Pennsylvania State Dept of Health. MEG Miranda, DVM, MM Dayrit, MD, Field Epidemiology Training Program, MC Saniel, MD, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Philippine Dept of Health. Div of Quarantine, Center for Prevention Svcs; Div of Global EIS, International Health Program Office; Scientific Resources Program, Div of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC. Editorial Note: The episodes documented in Virginia and Pennsylvania are the first known instances of Ebola-related filovirus infection in imported primates in the United States. Numerous infectious agents, including other filoviruses, with a range of pathogenic potential may be circulating in Africa, Asia, and other parts of the world. The ecology, natural history, and mode of transmission in nature of Ebola virus and the related Marburg virus are unknown. Humans have acquired the disease from nosocomial transmission (often by contaminated needles) and from person-to-person transmission to those in close contact with blood or secretions from seriously ill patients. The only known episode of the transmission of a filovirus from monkeys to humans resulted from direct handling, without protective measures, of blood and tissues from monkeys infected in the wild by Marburg virus. Animal caretakers did not become infected (2). The lack of human infection in these incidents suggests the effectiveness of the quarantine measures instituted in 1975. Nonetheless, CDC has developed the following interim guidelines that update and modify the procedures used in the transportation and quarantine of nonhuman primates. These guidelines are intended for interim use. A comprehensive set of guidelines will be developed by CDC, with input from organizations and institutions involved in the transport, quarantine, care, and regulation of nonhuman primates. INTERIM GUIDELINES FOR HANDLING NONHUMAN PRIMATES DURING TRANSIT AND QUARANTINE All imported nonhuman primates are quarantined for the first 31 days after arrival, including transit time. Nonhuman primates, particularly those recently captured in the wild, may harbor viruses infectious for humans. Although such viruses are usually present in the animal's blood, they may be detected in urine, feces, or saliva. Those at risk for infection include persons working in temporary or long-term holding facilities and persons who transport animals to these facilities (e.g., cargo handlers and inspectors). Although the risk for human infection from these activities is low, guidelines are useful to minimize such risk in persons exposed to nonhuman primates during transport and quarantine. General Guidelines for Handling Nonhuman Primates during Transit and Quarantine
Additional Guidelines for Handling Nonhuman Primates during Transit
Additional Guidelines for Care of Nonhuman Primates during Quarantine
References
*Program Operations Branch, Division of Quarantine, Center for Prevention Services, telephone (404) 639-1437; Special Pathogens Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases (DVRD), Center for Infectious Diseases (CID), telephone (404) 639-1115; Epidemiology Activity Branch, DVRD, CID, telephone (404) 639-3091; and the Animal Resources Branch, Scientific Resources Program, CID, telephone (404) 639-1320. Disclaimer All MMWR HTML documents published before January 1993 are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices. **Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.Page converted: 08/05/98 |
![]() | |||||||
This page last reviewed 5/2/01
|