Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE): Pfizer’s Pentavalent Meningococcal Vaccine (MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp)

About

CDC vaccine recommendations are developed using an explicit evidence-based method based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Introduction

On October 20, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of a pentavalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp [Penbraya, Pfizer]) for prevention of invasive disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y among persons aged 10–25 years.1 On October 25, 2023, CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp may be used when both MenACWY and MenB are indicated at the same visit for 1) healthy individuals aged 16–23 years (routine schedule) when shared clinical decision-making favors administration of MenB vaccination and 2) individuals aged 10 years and older at increased risk of meningococcal disease (e.g., due to persistent complement deficiencies, complement inhibitor use, or functional or anatomic asplenia).

A systematic review and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to inform ACIP’s deliberations regarding use of MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp. The policy questions under consideration were 1) Should the pentavalent vaccine be included as an option for people currently recommended to receive MenACWY and MenB?, 2) Should the pentavalent vaccine be included as an option for people currently recommended to receive MenACWY only?, and 3) Should the pentavalent vaccine be included as an option for people currently recommended to receive MenB only? (Tables 1a–c).

Methods

Members of ACIP’s Meningococcal Vaccines Work Group (“Work Group”) selected policy questions and prespecified and rated the importance of relevant outcomes (including benefits and harms) before the GRADE assessment (Tables 1a–c, Table 2). All Work Group members and CDC staff participating in the GRADE assessment met ACIP requirements for reporting conflicts of interest.

A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, Global Health, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Efforts also were made to obtain unpublished or other relevant data. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and reviewed full-text records. Records were included if they presented primary data on Pfizer’s pentavalent meningococcal vaccine. Characteristics of all included studies are shown in Appendix 1, and evidence retrieval methods are shown in Appendix 2.234

The GRADE evidence certainty assessment addressed risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and other characteristics. The evidence certainty categories include high, moderate, low, or very low certainty.

Results

A summary of the GRADE assessment was presented to ACIP on June 23, 2023. Overall, 48 records were identified and screened; 29 records were excluded based on the title and abstract, and 10 records were excluded based on full text review. The remaining nine records described results from three randomized controlled clinical trials and were included in the evidence synthesis and GRADE assessment (Appendix 1).

No data were identified regarding the outcomes “disease caused by serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y” or “interference with other recommended vaccines administered concurrently.” Data on the remaining outcomes are summarized in the tables below. When the available data applied to all 3 policy questions, only one table is shown; separate tables were created when the data varied by policy question.

Summary

For all outcomes, the initial evidence level was high because the available data were from randomized control trials. The final evidence certainty was the same for all three policy questions. The evidence certainty for short-term immunity was moderate for healthy persons and low for persons at increased risk. The evidence certainty for persistent immunity was low for serogroups A, C, W, and Y for healthy persons, moderate for serogroup B for healthy persons, and low for all serogroups for those at increased risk. For both serious and non-serious adverse events, the level of certainty was low for healthy persons, and very low for those at increased risk.

Table 1a: Policy Question and PICO 1

Policy question:
Should the pentavalent vaccine be included as an option for people currently recommended to receive MenACWY and MenB?
Population
All individuals aged 10 years or older currently recommended to receive MenACWY and MenB vaccine
Intervention
Vaccination with the pentavalent vaccine
Comparison
Vaccination with currently licensed MenACWY and MenB vaccine
Outcomes
  • Disease caused by serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y
  • Short-term immunity
  • Persistent immunity
  • Interference with other recommended vaccines administered concurrently
  • Serious adverse events
  • Non-serious adverse events

Table 1b: Policy Question and PICO 2

Policy question:
Should the pentavalent vaccine be included as an option for people currently recommended to receive MenACWY only?
Population
All individuals aged 10 years or older currently recommended to receive MenACWY vaccine
Intervention
Vaccination with the pentavalent vaccine
Comparison
Vaccination with currently licensed MenACWY vaccine
Outcomes
  • Disease caused by serogroups A, C, W, and Y
  • Short-term immunity
  • Persistent immunity
  • Interference with other recommended vaccines administered concurrently
  • Serious adverse events
  • Non-serious adverse events

Table 1c: Policy Question and PICO 3

Policy question:
Should the pentavalent vaccine be included as an option for people currently recommended to receive MenB only?
Population
All individuals aged 10 years or older currently recommended to receive MenB vaccine
Intervention
Vaccination with the pentavalent vaccine
Comparison
Vaccination with currently licensed MenB vaccine
Outcomes
  • Disease caused by serogroup B
  • Short-term immunity
  • Persistent immunity
  • Interference with other recommended vaccines administered concurrently
  • Serious adverse events
  • Non-serious adverse events

Table 2: Outcomes and Rankings

Outcome Importance Included in Profile
Meningococcal disease caused by serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y Critical No
Short-term immunity Critical Yes
Persistent immunity Important Yes
Interference with other recommended vaccines administered concurrently Important No
Serious adverse events Critical Yes
Non-serious adverse events Important Yes

Table 3a: Summary of Studies Reporting Short-Term Immunity — PICOs 1, 2, and 3

Author, pub year Age or other characteristic Serogroup (test strain) n/N MenABCWY n/N comparison Intervention vaccine Comparator vaccine Effect estimate — RR (95% CI) Study limitations (risk of bias)
Seroresponse based on hSBA titera 1 month after 1 intervention dose
Pfizer CT (NCT04440163), 2020 10–25 years; ACWY naïve A 484/499 242/254 MenABCWY (1 dose) MenACWY-CRM (1 dose) + MenB-FHbp (1 dose) 1.02 (0.99–1.05) Not serious
C 315/501 132/252 1.20 (1.05–1.38)
W 390/492 178/244 1.09 (0.99–1.19)
Y 405/494 175/248 1.16 (1.06–1.27)
10–25 years; ACWY primed A 416/439 220/227 0.98 (0.95–1.01)
C 410/439 214/226 0.99 (0.95–1.03)
W 417/428 214/222 1.01 (0.98–1.04)
Y 417/442 209/223 1.01 (0.97–1.05)
Seroresponse based on hSBA titer 1 month after 2 intervention doses
Pfizer CT (NCT04440163), 2020 10–25 years; ACWY naïve A 437/447 242/254 MenABCWY (2 doses 6 months apart) MenACWY-CRM (1 dose) + MenB-FHbp (2 doses 6 months apart) 1.03 (1.00–1.06) Not serious
C 421/451 132/252 1.78 (1.58–2.01)
W 427/439 178/244 1.33 (1.23–1.44)
Y 421/446 175/248 1.34 (1.23–1.45)
10–25 years; B naïveb B (A22) 646/778 313/396 1.05 (0.99–1.12)
B (A56) 774/807 378/400 1.02 (0.99–1.05)
B (B24) 567/833 239/418 1.19 (1.08–1.31)
B (B44) 731/845 332/419 1.09 (1.03–1.15)
B (composite) 591/755 263/419 1.25 (1.15–1.36)
10–25 years; ACWY primed A 361/385 220/227 0.97 (0.93–1.00)
C 362/386 214/226 0.99 (0.95–1.03)
W 365/376 214/222 1.01 (0.98–1.04)
Y 360/387 209/223 0.99 (0.95–1.04)

a hSBA stands for serum bactericidal assay using human complement. For participants with a baseline hSBA titer <1:4, seroresponse is defined as a titer ≥1:16. For those with a baseline hSBA titer ≥1:4 and <1:8 (<1:16 for A22), seroresponse is a titer ≥4 times the 1:8 (1:16 for A22). For those with a baseline hSBA titer ≥1:8 (≥1:16 for A22), seroresponse is a titer ≥4 times the baseline titer.
b Serogroup B primed was not assessed.

Table 3b: Summary of Studies Reporting Persistent Immunity — PICOs 1, 2, and 3

Author, pub year Age or other characteristic Serogroup (test strain) n/N MenABCWY n/N comparison Intervention vaccine Comparator vaccine Effect estimate — RR (95% CI) Study limitations (risk of bias)
Seroprotection (defined as hSBA titer ≥1:8 for all but A22 which is ≥1:16) at 12 months (18 months for MenACWY-CRM) after last dosea
Pfizer CT (NCT03135834), 2017 10–25 years; ACWY naïve A 102/112 42/59 MenABCWY (2 doses 6 months apart) MenACWY-CRM (1 dose) + MenB-FHbp (2 doses 6 months apart) 1.28 (1.08–1.52) Not serious
C 86/112 32/62 1.49 (1.15–1.93)
W 111/112 52/62 1.18 (1.06–1.32)
Y 112/112 61/62 1.02 (0.98–1.05)
10–25 years; B naïveb B (A22) 53/162 22/83 1.23 (0.81–1.88)
B (A56) 54/162 27/83 1.03 (0.70–1.50)
B (B24) 51/165 24/85 1.10 (0.73–1.65)
B (B44) 31/166 13/85 1.22 (0.68–2.21)
10–25 years; ACWY primed A 47/48 22/22 0.98 (0.94–1.02)
C 52/54 21/23 1.06 (0.92–1.21)
W 48/48 21/22 1.05 (0.96–1.15)
Y 48/48 22/22 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
Seroprotection (defined as hSBA titer ≥1:8 for all but A22 which is ≥1:16) at 24 months (30 months for MenACWY-CRM) after last dose
Pfizer CT (NCT03135834), 2017 10–25 years; ACWY naïve A 89/101 42/60 MenABCWY (2 doses 6 months apart) MenACWY-CRM (1 dose) + MenB-FHbp (2 doses 6 months apart) 1.26 (1.05–1.51) Not serious
C 76/101 29/61 1.58 (1.19–2.11)
W 102/103 48/61 1.26 (1.10–1.44)
Y 102/102 57/61 1.07 (1.00–1.14)
10–25 years; B naïve B (A22) 72/196 37/128 1.27 (0.92–1.76)
B (A56) 68/196 44/131 1.03 (0.76–1.41)
B (B24) 65/196 36/131 1.21 (0.86–1.70)
B (B44) 36/200 24/132 0.99 (0.62–1.58)
10–25 years; ACWY primed A 61/61 37/37 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
C 94/97 67/71 1.03 (0.96–1.10)
W 61/61 35/37 1.06 (0.98–1.14)
Y 61/61 37/37 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
Seroprotection (defined as hSBA titer ≥1:8 for all but A22 which is ≥1:16) at 36 months (42 months for MenACWY-CRM) after last dose
Pfizer CT (NCT03135834), 2017 10–25 years; ACWY naïve A 84/95 39/54 MenABCWY (2 doses 6 months apart) MenACWY-CRM (1 dose) + MenB-FHbp (2 doses 6 months apart) 1.22 (1.02–1.47) Not serious
C 64/95 24/54 1.52 (1.09–2.11)
W 92/97 42/54 1.22 (1.05–1.42)
Y 97/97 49/54 1.10 (1.01–1.20)
10–25 years; B naïve B (A22) 54/185 30/116 1.13 (0.77–1.65)
B (A56) 54/186 40/118 0.86 (0.61–1.20)
B (B24) 68/192 34/120 1.25 (0.89–1.76)
B (B44) 39/193 24/121 1.02 (0.65–1.61)
10–25 years; ACWY primed A 57/57 32/33 1.03 (0.97–1.10)
C 93/96 64/67 1.01 (0.95–1.08)
W 57/57 32/33 1.03 (0.97–1.10)
Y 57/57 32/33 1.03 (0.97–1.10)
Seroprotection (defined as hSBA titer ≥1:8 for all but A22 which is ≥1:16) at 48 months (54 months for MenACWY-CRM) after last dose
Pfizer CT (NCT03135834), 2017 10–25 years; ACWY naïve A 58/71 26/41 MenABCWY (2 doses 6 months apart) MenACWY-CRM (1 dose) + MenB-FHbp (2 doses 6 months apart) 1.29 (1.00–1.67) Not serious
C 44/71 16/42 1.63 (1.06–2.49)
W 64/70 29/41 1.29 (1.05–1.59)
Y 71/71 40/42 1.05 (0.98–1.12)
10–25 years; B naïve B (A22) 39/139 30/94 0.88 (0.59–1.31)
B (A56) 50/145 29/98 1.17 (0.80–1.70)
B (B24) 53/145 26/98 1.38 (0.93–2.04)
B (B44) 27/148 16/99 1.13 (0.64–1.98)
10–25 years; ACWY primed A 40/40 23/23 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
C 75/76 52/58 1.10 (1.01–1.21)
W 40/40 21/23 1.10 (0.97–1.24)
Y 40/40 22/22 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
Seroprotection (defined as hSBA titer ≥1:8) at 13 months (12 months for MenACWY-CRM) after last dose
Pfizer CT (NCT04440176), 2020, and Pfizer CT (NCT03135834), 2017 11–14 years for NCT04440176 and 10–25 years for NCT03135834; both groups ACWY naive A 102/126 42/59 1 dose of MenABCWY 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM 1.14 (0.95–1.37) Not serious
C 92/127 32/62 1.40 (1.08–1.83)
W 125/128 52/62 1.16 (1.04–1.30)
Y 122/126 61/62 0.98 (0.94–1.03)

a Seroprotection analyses are staggered for ACWY comparisons with the single dose MenACWY-CRM group starting 6 months after the 2 dose MenABCWY group (e.g., 18 months after the single dose of MenACWY-CRM versus 12 months after the 2 doses of MenABCWY). Seroprotection for the MenB component analyses is not staggered.
b Serogroup B primed was not assessed.

Table 3c: Summary of Studies Reporting Serious Adverse Eventsa — PICOs 1, 2, and 3

Author, pub year Age or other characteristic Type of event n/N MenABCWY n/N comparison Intervention vaccine Comparator vaccine Effect estimate — RR (95% CI) Study limitations (risk of bias)
Pfizer CT (NCT04440163), 2020 10–25 years All serious adverse events (SAE) during vaccination phaseb 7/1763c 0/649 MenABCWY (2 doses 6 months apart) MenACWY-CRM (1 dose) and MenB-FHbp (2 doses 6 months apart) 5.53 (0.32–96.64) Not serious
Pfizer CT (NCT04440176), 2020 d 11–14 years All SAEs during vaccination phase 0/146 N/A MenABCWY (2 doses 12 months apart) N/A N/A Not serious
Pfizer CT (NCT03135834), 2017 10–25 years All SAEs during primary vaccination phase 6/543e 8/1057 MenABCWY 2 dose primary series (6 months apart) MenACWY-CRM 1 dose + MenB-FHbp 2 doses primary series (6 months apart) 1.46 (0.51–4.19) Not serious
Pfizer CT (NCT03135834), 2017 10–25 years All SAEs during booster vaccination phase 0/144 1/96 MenABCWY 2 dose primary series (6 months apart) followed by 1 dose booster at 54 months MenACWY-CRM 1 dose + MenB-FHbp 2 dose primary series (6 months apart) followed by 1 dose boosterat 54 months 0.22 (0.01–5.42) Not serious

a Serious adverse events were any undesirable experience associated with vaccination in which the patient outcome was death, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, caused disability or permanent damage, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was another serious or important medical events as defined by Pfizer.5
b Vaccination phase refers to the time from the first study vaccination visit through 1 month after the last study vaccination.
c Nine SAEs occurred in 7 patients: Salmonella gastroenteritis (1 patient), depression (1 patient), anxiety (1 patient), suicide attempt (1 patient), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (1 patient), dyspnea (1 patient), head injury due to motor vehicle accident (1 patient), traumatic spinal cord injury (1 patient), and depression with suicidal ideation (1 patient).
d Not included in GRADE table 4 given no comparison group.
e Eight SAEs occurred in 6 patients: cyst (1 patient), tendon injury (1 patient), dyskinesia (1 patient), migraine with aura (1 patient), aggression (1 patient), conversion disorder (1 patient), and suicidal ideation (2 patients).

Table 3d: Summary of Studies Reporting Non-Serious Adverse Eventsa — PICOs 1, 2, and 3

Author, pub year Age or other characteristic Type of event n/N MenABCWY n/N comparison Intervention vaccine Comparator vaccine Effect estimate — RR (95% CI) Study limitations (risk of bias)
Pfizer CT (NCT04440163), 2020 10–25 years All nonserious adverse events (AEs) during vaccination phaseb 361/1763 132/649 MenABCWY (2 doses 6 months apart) MenACWY-CRM (1 dose) and MenB-FHbp (2 doses6 months apart) 1.00 (0.84–1.20) Not serious
Pfizer CT (NCT04440176), 2020 11–14 years All nonserious AEs during vaccination phase 51/146 N/A MenABCWY (2 doses 12 months apart) None N/A Not serious
Pfizer CT (NCT03135834), 2017 10–25 years All nonserious AEs during primary vaccination phase 207/543 422/1057 MenABCWY 2 dose primary series (6 monthsapart) MenACWY-CRM 1 dose + MenB-FHbp 2 doseprimary series (6 months apart)  0.95(0.84–1.09) Not serious
Pfizer CT (NCT03135834), 2017 10–25 years All AEs during booster vaccination phase 17/144 14/96 MenABCWY 2 dose primary series (6 monthsapart) followed by 1 dose booster at 54 months MenACWY-CRM 1 dose + MenB-FHbp 2 doseprimary series (6 months apart) followed by 1 dose booster at 54 months 0.81 (0.42–1.56) Not serious

a Nonserious adverse events included all adverse events during the vaccination phase except for serious adverse events. As defined by Pfizer, all adverse events included serious adverse events, nonserious adverse events, medically attended events (nonserious adverse events that resulted in evaluation at a medical facility), and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions (a disease or medical condition, not previously identified, that is expected to be persistent or is otherwise long-lasting in its effects).
b Vaccination phase refers to the time from the first study vaccination visit through 1 month after the last study vaccination.

Table 4a: GRADE Summary of Findings for Healthy Persons — PICOs 1, 2, and 3

Certainty assessment № of patients Effect Certainty Importance
№ of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Pfizer MenABCWY MenACWY and MenB Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Short-term immunity for MenACWY (follow-up: 1 month)
1 Randomized trials Not
serious
Not
serious
Seriousa Not
serious
None In naïve participants, short-term immunity increases slightly for serogroups A, C, W, and Y at 1 month after 1 dose of MenABCWY versus 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM:
Serogroup A (n=753), RR of 1.02 (95% CI: 0.99–1.05)
Serogroup C (n=753), RR: 1.20 (95% CI: 1.05–1.38)
Serogroup W (n=736), RR 1.09 (95% CI: 0.99–1.19)
Serogroup Y (n=742), RR 1.16 (95% CI: 1.06–1.27)
In primed participants, little or no difference was observed in short-term immunity for serogroups A, C, W, and Y at 1 month after 1 dose of MenABCWY versus 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM:
Serogroup A (n=666), RR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–1.01)
Serogroup C (n=665), RR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95–1.03)
Serogroup W (n=650), RR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98–1.04)
Serogroup Y (n=665), RR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.97–1.05)
Moderate Critical
Short-term immunity for MenB (follow-up: 1 month)
1 Randomized trials Not
serious
Not
serious
Seriousa Not
serious
None 591/755 (78.3%)b 263/419 (62.8%)b RR 1.25
(1.15 to 1.36)
15,692 more per 100,000
(from 9,415 to 22,597 more)
Moderate Critical
Persistent immunity for MenACWY (follow-up: 48 months)
1 Randomized trials Not
serious
Not
serious
Very seriousa,c Not
serious
None In naïve participants, seroprotection probably increases for serogroups A, C, W, and Y at 48 months after 2 doses of MenABCWY versus 54 months after 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM:
Serogroup A (n=112), RR of 1.29 (95% CI: 1.00–1.67)
Serogroup C (n=113), RR: 1.63 (95% CI: 1.06–2.49)
Serogroup W (n=111), RR 1.29 (95% CI: 1.05–1.59)
Serogroup Y (n=113), RR 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98–1.12)
In primed participants, little or no difference was observed in seroprotection for serogroups A, C, W, and Y at 48 months after 2 doses of MenABCWY versus 54 months after 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM:
Serogroup A (n=63), RR of 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00–1.00)
Serogroup C (n=134), RR: 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01–1.21)
Serogroup W (n=63), RR 1.10 (95% CI: 0.97–1.24)
Serogroup Y (n=62), RR 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00–1.00)
Low Important
Persistent immunity for MenB (follow-up: 48 months)
1 Randomized trials Not
serious
Not
serious
Seriousa Not
serious
None In naïve participants, little or no difference was observed in seroprotection for serogroup B at 48 months after 2 doses of MenABCWY versus 48 months after 2 doses of MenB-FHbp:
Serogroup B (A22) (n=233), RR of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.59–1.31)
Serogroup B (A56) (n=243), RR: 1.17 (95% CI: 0.80–1.70)
Serogroup B (B24) (n=243), RR 1.38 (95% CI: 0.93–2.04)
Serogroup B (B44) (n=247), RR 1.13 (95% CI: 0.64–1.98)
Moderate Important
Serious Adverse Eventsd
2 Randomized trials Not
serious
Not
serious
Seriouse Seriousf None 13/2306 (0.6%) 8/1706 (0.5%) RR 1.20
(0.50 to 2.89)
94 more per 100,000
(from 234 fewer to 886 more)
Low Critical
Non-Serious Adverse Eventsd
2 Randomized trials Not
serious
Not
serious
Seriouse Seriousg None 568/2306 (24.6%) 554/1706 (32.5%) RR 0.76
(0.69 to 0.84)
7,794 fewer per 100,000
(from 10,067 fewer to 5,196 fewer)
Low Important

a hSBA titers are the established correlate of protection for serogroup C meningococcal disease. This correlation is assumed to extend to other serogroups, but direct evidence for these serogroups is limited.6
b Calculated based on serogroup B composite data.
c Comparisons were between 2 doses of MenABCWY and 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM. Comparisons also were staggered by 6 months.
d Following primary vaccination.
e Comparisons were between 2 doses of MenABCWY and 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM plus 2 doses of MenB-FHbp.
f Downgraded because the relative effect confidence intervals are wide.
g Downgraded because the absolute effect confidence intervals are wide.

Table 4b: GRADE Summary of Findings for Persons at Increased Risk due to Underlying Medical Conditions — PICOs 1, 2, and 3

Certainty assessment № of patients Effect Certainty Importance
№ of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Pfizer MenABCWY MenACWY and MenB Relative
(95% CI)
Absolute
(95% CI)
Short-term immunity for MenACWY (follow-up: 1 month)
1 Randomized trials Not serious Not
serious
Very seriousa,b Not
serious
None In naïve participants, short-term immunity increases slightly for serogroups A, C, W, and Y at 1 month after 1 dose of MenABCWY versus 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM:
Serogroup A (n=753), RR of 1.02 (95% CI: 0.99–1.05)
Serogroup C (n=753), RR: 1.20 (95% CI: 1.05–1.38)
Serogroup W (n=736), RR 1.09 (95% CI: 0.99–1.19)
Serogroup Y (n=742), RR 1.16 (95% CI: 1.06–1.27)
In primed participants, little or no difference was observed in short-term immunity for serogroups A, C, W, and Y at 1 month after 1 dose of MenABCWY versus 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM:
Serogroup A (n=666), RR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–1.01)
Serogroup C (n=665), RR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95–1.03)
Serogroup W (n=650), RR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98–1.04)
Serogroup Y (n=665), RR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.97–1.05)
Low Critical
Short-term immunity for MenB (follow-up: 1 month)
1 Randomized trials Not serious Not
serious
Very seriousa,b Not
serious
None 591/755 (78.3%)c 263/419 (62.8%)c RR 1.25
(1.15 to 1.36)
15,692 more per 100,000
(from 9,415 to 22,597 more)
Low Critical
Persistent immunity for MenACWY (follow-up: 48 months)
1 Randomized trials Not serious Not
serious
Very seriousa,b,d Not
serious
None In naïve participants, seroprotection probably increases for serogroups A, C, W, and Y at 48 months after 2 doses of MenABCWY versus 54 months after 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM:
Serogroup A (n=112), RR of 1.29 (95% CI: 1.00–1.67)
Serogroup C (n=113), RR: 1.63 (95% CI: 1.06–2.49)
Serogroup W (n=111), RR 1.29 (95% CI: 1.05–1.59)
Serogroup Y (n=113), RR 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98–1.12)
In primed participants, little or no difference was observed in seroprotection for serogroups A, C, W, and Y at 48 months after 2 doses of MenABCWY versus 54 months after 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM:
Serogroup A (n=63), RR of 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00–1.00)
Serogroup C (n=134), RR: 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01–1.21)
Serogroup W (n=63), RR 1.10 (95% CI: 0.97–1.24)
Serogroup Y (n=62), RR 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00–1.00)
Low Important
Persistent immunity for MenB (follow-up: 48 months)
1 Randomized trials Not serious Not
serious
Very seriousa,b Not
serious
None In naïve participants, little or no difference was observed in seroprotection for serogroup B at 48 months after 2 doses of MenABCWY versus 48 months after 2 doses of MenB-FHbp:
Serogroup B (A22) (n=233), RR of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.59–1.31)
Serogroup B (A56) (n=243), RR: 1.17 (95% CI: 0.80–1.70)
Serogroup B (B24) (n=243), RR 1.38 (95% CI: 0.93–2.04)
Serogroup B (B44) (n=247), RR 1.13 (95% CI: 0.64–1.98)
Low Important
Serious Adverse Eventse
2 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Very seriousa,f Seriousg None 13/2306 (0.6%) 8/1706 (0.5%) RR 1.20
(0.50 to 2.89)
 94 more per 100,000
(from 234  fewer to 886 more)
Very low Critical
Non-Serious Adverse Eventse
2 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Seriousa,f Serioush None 568/2306 (24.6%) 554/1706 (32.5%) RR 0.76
(0.69 to 0.84)
7,794 fewer per 100,000
(from 10,067 fewer to 5,196 fewer)
Very low Important

a Clinical trials did not include patients at increased risk for invasive disease.
b hSBA titers are the established correlate of protection for serogroup C meningococcal disease. This correlation is assumed to extend to other serogroups, but direct evidence for these serogroups is limited.6
c Calculated based on serogroup B composite data.
d Comparisons were between 2 doses of MenABCWY and 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM. Comparisons also were staggered by 6 months.
e Following primary vaccination.
f Comparisons were between 2 doses of MenABCWY and 1 dose of MenACWY-CRM plus 2 doses of MenB-FHbp.
g Downgraded because the relative effect confidence intervals are wide.
h Downgraded because the absolute effect confidence intervals are wide.

Table 5: Summary of Evidence, PICO 1

Outcome Importance Included in Evidence Profile Certainty for Healthy Individuals Certainty for Individuals at Increased Risk
Meningococcal disease caused by serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y Critical No
Short-term immunity Critical Yes Moderate Low
Persistent immunity Important Yes Low Low
Interference with other recommended vaccines administered concurrently Important No
Serious adverse events Critical Yes Low Very low
Non-serious adverse events Important Yes Low Very low

Table 5: Summary of Evidence, PICO 2

Outcome Importance Included in Evidence Profile Certainty for Healthy Individuals Certainty for Individuals at Increased Risk
Meningococcal disease caused by serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y Critical No
Short-term immunity Critical Yes Moderate Low
Persistent immunity Important Yes Low Low
Interference with other recommended vaccines administered concurrently Important No
Serious adverse events Critical Yes Low Very low
Non-serious adverse events Important Yes Low Very low

Table 5: Summary of Evidence, PICO 3

Outcome Importance Included in Evidence Profile Certainty for Healthy Individuals Certainty for Individuals at Increased Risk
Meningococcal disease caused by serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y Critical No
Short-term immunity Critical Yes Moderate Low
Persistent immunity Important Yes Moderate Low
Interference with other recommended vaccines administered concurrently Important No
Serious adverse events Critical Yes Low Very low
Non-serious adverse events Important Yes Low Very low

Appendix 1: Studies Included in Review of Evidence

Author, Year Study Design Country Age Number of Participants Number Intervention Number Comparison Data Sources
Pfizer (NCT04440163),
20202
RCT US, Czech R., Denmark, Hungary, Poland 10–25 years 2412 1763 649 Clinicaltrials.gov, Pfizer WG and ACIP presentations, Pfizer correspondence, Pfizer preliminary results presentations
Pfizer (NCT03135834),
20173
RCT US, Czech R., Finland, Poland 10–25 years 1600 543 1057
Pfizer (NCT04440176),
20204
RCT US 11–14 years 294 294 N/A

Appendix 2: Search Strategies

Database Search terms Records
Medline, Embase, Global Health, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov meningococcal pentavalent, pentavalent meningococcal, Pfizer pentavalent meningococcal, MenABCWY, Pfizer MenABCWY, pentavalent MenABCWY, ABCWY, MenABCWY meningococcal, Neisseria meningitidis group A, B, C, W, and Y, Neisseria meningitidis A, B, C, W, and Y, Neisseria meningitidis pentavalent, bivalent RLP2086-containing pentavalent, NCT03135834, B1971057, NCT04440163, C3511001, NCT04440176, C3511004, and “vaccin*” 43

View Page In: PDF

View the complete list of GRADE evidence tables‎

  1. S. Food and Drug Administration. October 20, 2023 Approval Letter – PENBRAYA; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA. 2023. October 20, 2023 Approval Letter – PENBRAYA (fda.gov)
  2. MenABCWY Noninferiority Study in Healthy Participants ≥10 to <26 Years of Age (NCT04440163). https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04440163.
  3. A Trial to Describe the Immunogenicity and Safety of 2 Doses of Bivalent rLP2086 (Trumenba) and a Pentavalent Meningococcal Vaccine in Healthy Subjects >=10 to <26 Years of Age (NCT03135834). https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03135834.
  4. A Trial to Describe the Safety and Immunogenicity of MenABCWY When Administered on 2 Schedules (NCT04440176). https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04440176.
  5. S. Food and Drug Administration. What is a Serious Adverse Event? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA. 2023. https://www.fda.gov/safety/reporting-serious-problems-fda/what-serious-adverse-event.
  6. Goldschneider I, Gotschlich EC, Artenstein MS. Human immunity to the meningococcus. I. The role of humoral antibodies. J Exp Med. 1969;129(6):1307–26.