|
||||||||
|
Volume 3: No. 3, July 2006
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
|
Data Source |
Rate per 100,000 Person Years |
---|---|
OSHPD Medi-Cal |
463 |
Medi-Cal Fee-for-Service |
473 |
Alameda Alliance for Health |
31 |
Blue Cross of California |
33 |
Figure 3. Hospitalization rates attributable to asthma (primary diagnosis only) among Medi-Cal beneficiaries during 2001 in Alameda County, California, by source of data. The Office of Statewide Healthcare Planning and Development (OSHPD) includes 100% of county residents receiving Medi-Cal benefits; the other three data sources include only their respective portions of this population. The OSHPD rate is calculated for children aged 0 to 14 years; all other rates are for children aged 0 to 17 years.
This graph shows the distribution of the Kaiser Permanente of Northern California enrollee population by category of annual family income. The y axis is labeled “Percentage Living in Census Tract” and the x axis is labeled “Median Annual Family Income” divided into five categories: less than $30,000; $30,000–$49,000; $50,000–$69,000; $70,000–$90,000; and more than $90,000. The graph shows approximately 5% of the enrollee population in the less-than-$30,000 category; the graph peaks at approximately 34% in the $50,000–$69,000 category and decreases to approximately 15% in the more-than-$90,000 category. The figure also shows the income distribution of the general population for the county, which shows a similar pattern. Approximately 7% of the general population are in the less-than-$30,000 category; the graph peaks at approximately 30% in the $50,000–$69,000 category and decreases to approximately 17% in the more-than-$90,000 category. The enrollee population shows high congruence with the general population of the county, although it slightly underrepresents populations in the lowest and highest income categories and overrepresents those in the middle category.
Figure 4. Population representation of Kaiser Permanente of Northern California enrollee population, Alameda County, California, 2001.
|
|
|
|
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
Privacy Policy | Accessibility This page last reviewed October 25, 2011
|
|