|
|
|||||||||
|
Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail. Rates of Cesarean Delivery -- United States, 1993The rate of cesarean delivery in the United States is among the highest for developed nations (1). Because increased risks for maternal death and morbidity and perinatal morbidity are associated with cesarean delivery, a national health objective for the year 2000 is to reduce the overall rate of cesarean delivery to less than or equal to 15.0 per 100 deliveries (1987 baseline: 24.4 per 100 deliveries) (objective 14.8) (2) -- a level last observed in 1978 (3). This report uses data from CDC's National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) to characterize cesarean deliveries during 1993, compares these rates with rates for 1970-1992, and assesses progress toward the national health objective for the year 2000. Since 1965, NHDS has collected data annually on discharges from short-stay, nonfederal hospitals. For 1993, medical and demographic information were abstracted from a sample of 235,411 inpatients discharged from the 466 participating hospitals. In this analysis, data about the number of cesareans and vaginal births after a previous cesarean (VBAC) are based on weighted national estimates from the NHDS sample of approximately 27,000 (11.5%) women discharged after delivery. The estimated numbers of live births by type of delivery were calculated by applying cesarean rates from the NHDS to the number of live births from national vital registration data. Stated differences in this report are significant at the 95% confidence level. In 1993, of the estimated 4,039,000 live births, approximately 585,000 (14.5%) were primary cesareans, 336,000 (8.3%) repeat cesareans, 115,000 (2.9%) VBACs, and 3,003,000 (74.4%) other vaginal deliveries. The overall rate of cesarean delivery in 1993 was 22.8 per 100 deliveries, the lowest rate since 1985 but approximately four times the rate in 1970 (5.5) Table_1. The primary cesarean rate (i.e., number of first cesareans per 100 deliveries to women who had no previous cesarean) for 1993 (16.3) also was the lowest rate since 1985 but approximately four times the rate in 1970 (4.2). Declines in the overall and primary cesarean delivery rates from the mid-1980s to 1993 were not statistically significant. In 1993, of the women who had a previous cesarean birth, approximately one fourth gave birth vaginally (VBAC rate: 25.4); the VBAC rate in 1993 more than doubled from 1988 (12.6). In 1993, the overall rate of cesarean delivery differed by region, maternal age, hospital size and ownership, and expected source of payment Table_2. Rates were higher in the South *, for mothers aged greater than or equal to 30 years (especially those aged greater than or equal to 35 years), for hospitals containing less than 100 beds, for proprietary hospitals, and for mothers with Blue Cross/Blue Shield ** or other private insurance. The rate of cesarean delivery varied by the complications of pregnancy or delivery that preceded the cesarean. Rates were highest for women who had fetopelvic disproportion (98.5 per 100 deliveries) or failed induction of labor (94.3). Common medical complications were breech presentation (rate: 87.1); history of previous cesarean (74.6); antepartum hemorrhage, abruptio placenta, and placenta previa (64.1); obstructed labor (63.5); and multiple gestation (57.8). In 1993, of all women who had a cesarean, 36.5% had a previous cesarean delivery, 17.4% had an abnormal labor, and 17.0% had fetopelvic disproportion. Of all women who delivered, 11.2% had a previous cesarean, 8.7% each had abnormal labor or uterine inertia, and 7.6% were anemic. Reported by: Natality, Marriage, and Divorce Statistics Br, Div of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC. Editorial NoteEditorial Note: The findings in this report indicate that the overall and primary cesarean rates have remained relatively stable since the mid-1980s. Although the VBAC rate increased twofold during 1988-1993, the anticipated reduction in the overall rate of cesarean delivery was offset by trends among women giving birth that are associated with higher risk for cesarean delivery (i.e., increases in maternal age at birth and in first order and plural births {4}). In particular, maternal age is an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery even after adjustments for other potential confounding factors (e.g., race, education, and complications of labor and delivery) (5). In this study, rates of cesarean delivery were analyzed separately by region, hospital size and ownership, and expected source of payment; therefore, simultaneous effects of the other variables could not be analyzed. For example, the study could not assess whether the higher rates of cesarean delivery in small hospitals (i.e., less than 100 beds) reflected the increased likelihood of proprietary ownership of these hospitals. The overall cesarean delivery rate is directly associated with the primary cesarean rate and the VBAC rate. Therefore, in addition to establishing year 2000 national health objective 14.8 to assist in monitoring trends in the overall cesarean delivery rate, two more specific objectives were established to monitor trends in primary cesarean and VBAC rates. The objectives are to reduce the primary cesarean delivery rate to less than or equal to 12.0 per 100 deliveries (1987 baseline: 17.4 per 100 deliveries) (objective 14.8a) and to increase the number of VBACs to greater than or equal to 35.0 per 100 women who had a previous cesarean (objective 14.8b) (2). If the VBAC rate continues to increase at the rate observed during 1988-1993, the national health objective may be met by the year 2000; however, the most recent data indicate the rate stabilized during 1991-1993. Even with a VBAC rate of 35.0, the primary rate must decline by nearly half (to 8.4) to achieve the year 2000 target rate for overall cesarean deliveries (15.0). Based on the stability of the primary cesarean delivery rates during 1985-1993, the overall cesarean rate probably will not decline to meet the objective by the year 2000. In many countries with demographic profiles similar to the United States, cesarean rates are less than or equal to 15.0 per 100 deliveries (1). Strategies to achieve this rate in the United States will require the widespread use of four obstetrical practices that have been successful in reducing cesarean delivery rates in many hospitals: 1) active management of labor; 2) public dissemination of physician-specific cesarean delivery rates to increase public awareness of differences in practices; 3) implementation of standardized protocols for repeat cesareans, dystocia, and fetal distress; and 4) establishment of reduction of the rate as an institutional priority (6-8). References
* South=Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia ** Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Public Health Service or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Table_1 Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size. TABLE 1. Number of live births; estimated rate of cesarean deliveries, by type; estimated number and percentage of cesarean deliveries, by type; and estimated number and rate of vaginal births after a previous cesarean delivery, by year -- United States, selected years, 1970--1993 ============================================================================================================================= Cesarean deliveries * --------------------- Vaginal birth Cesarean rate Repeat + after a previous cesarean No. live --------------------- ----------- -------------------------- Year births & Primary @ Overall ** No. primary & No. & (%) Total& No. * & Rate ++ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1993 4039 && 16.3 22.8 585 336 (36.5) 921 115 25.4 1992 4084 16.8 23.6 605 359 (37.2) 964 119 25.1 1991 4111 17.1 23.5 628 338 (35.0) 966 108 24.2 1990 4158 16.8 23.5 626 351 (35.9) 977 90 20.4 1989 4041 17.1 23.8 620 342 (35.6) 962 78 18.5 1988 3910 17.5 24.7 615 351 (36.3) 966 50 12.6 1987 3809 17.4 24.4 601 328 (35.3) 929 36 9.8 1986 3757 17.4 24.1 595 310 (34.3) 905 29 8.5 1985 3761 16.3 22.7 559 295 (34.6) 854 21 6.6 1980 3612 12.1 16.5 418 178 (29.9) 596 6 @@ 3.4 @@ 1975 3144 7.8 10.4 238 89 (27.1) 327 2 @@ 2.0 @@ 1970 3731 4.2 5.5 153 52 (25.2) 205 1 @@ 2.2 @@ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Estimated by applying cesarean rates derived from the National Hospital Discharge Survey to the number of live births from national vital registration data. + Proportion of all cesareans that are repeat cesareans; standard error does not exceed 1.8% for any year. & In thousands. @ Number of first cesareans per 100 deliveries to women who had no previous cesarean delivery; standard error does not exceed 1.1% for any year. ** Number of cesarean deliveries per 100 deliveries; standard error does not exceed 1.5% for any year. ++ Number of women who had a vaginal birth after a previous cesarean delivery per 100 deliveries to women who had a previous cesarean delivery; standard error does not exceed 1.3% for any year. && Provisional data. @@ Number does not meet standards of reliability or precision because the weighted numerator is <10,000 deliveries. ============================================================================================================================= Return to top. Table_2 Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size. TABLE 2. Estimated overall and primary cesarean rates, * by region, age of mother, hospital size and ownership, and expected source of payment -- United States, 1993 ============================================================================================ Estimated overall cesarean Estimated primary cesarean -------------------------- -------------------------- Category Rate (SE +) Rate (SE) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Region & Northeast 23.4 (0.9) 17.4 (0.8) Midwest 20.8 (1.1) 14.4 (1.1) South 25.9 (0.9) 18.6 (0.8) West 19.3 (1.6) 13.7 (1.5) Age (yrs) of mother <20 15.6 (0.8) 14.0 (0.8) 20-24 19.9 (0.6) 15.1 (0.6) 25-29 23.0 (0.6) 16.1 (0.6) 30-34 26.3 (0.7) 17.1 (0.7) >=35 30.3 (1.1) 21.9 (1.1) Hospital size (no. beds) <100 25.4 (1.0) 17.9 (0.9) 100-299 21.9 (0.6) 15.5 (0.6) 300-499 22.6 (0.9) 16.2 (0.8) >=500 22.2 (1.3) 16.9 (1.2) Hospital ownership Nonprofit 22.0 (0.5) 15.8 (0.5) State and local government 20.5 (1.1) 14.0 (1.1) Proprietary 29.0 (1.2) 20.7 (1.1) Expected source of payment Blue Cross/Blue Shield@ 26.7 (3.2) 18.6 (0.7) Other private insurance 25.7 (1.6) 18.7 (0.8) Medicaid 19.5 (1.0) 13.8 (0.9) Other government sources 24.5 (4.0) 16.8 (0.6) Self 16.1 (2.4) 12.1 (0.8) Other 21.9 (3.1) 14.4 (0.8) Total 22.8 (0.4) 16.3 (0.4) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Overall=number of cesarean deliveries per 100 deliveries; primary=number of first cesareans per 100 deliveries to women who did not have a previous cesarean. + Standard error. & Northeast=Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Midwest=Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming; South=Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia; West=Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington. @ Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Public Health Service or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. =========================================================================================== Return to top. Disclaimer All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices. **Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.Page converted: 09/19/98 |
|||||||||
This page last reviewed 5/2/01
|