skip nav
  Home | About CDC | Press Room | A-Z Index | Contact Us
spacer
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Home Page
CDC en Espaρol
Search:  

CDC HomeHIV/AIDS > Topics > Statistics and Surveillance > Guidelines > Integrated Guidelines for Developing Epidemiologic Profiles

spacer
spacer spacer
spacer
 
Skip Nav spacer
spacer
List of Tables
spacer
spacer

Table 3-1: Distribution of the general population in State X, by age group and sex, 2000

Age (yrs) Males, %
(n = 2,289,037)
Females, %
(n = 2,461,122)
Total, %
(N = 4,750,159)
<2 2.8 2.5 2.7
2–12 17.1 15.2 16.1
13–24 16.2 14.7 15.4
25–44 31.8 31.7 31.8
45–64 22.9 23.3 23.1
≥65 9.2 12.6 11.0
Source. Census 2000 Summary File 2. Available at http://factfinder.census.gov.

Interpretation: For males and females, one third were under 25 years of age, one third were 25 to 44 years old, and one tenth were at least 65 years old.

Back

Table 3-2: Percentage distribution of the population, by race/ethnicity for each sex, 2000

Race/ethnicity Males, %
(n = 2,289,037)
Females, %
(n = 2,461,122)
Total, %
(N = 4,750,159)
Hispanic 6.9 5.9 6.4
Not Hispanic, of 1 race
White 60.7 59.6 60.1
Black 24.9 26.9 25.9
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3 0.2 0.2
Asian 5.0 5.1 5.0
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 0.2 0.2 0.2
Some other race 0.2 0.2 0.2
Not Hispanic, of ≥ 2 races 1.9 1.8 1.9
Source. http://factfinder.census.gov.

Interpretation: A greater proportion (about 61%) of the population consisted of whites; about 25% consisted of blacks. Hispanics accounted for another 6% and Asians for 5%. The racial/ethnic distribution of males was similar to that of females.

Back

Table 3-3: Percentage distribution of the population, by race/ethnicity and county of residence, 2000

Race/ethnicity Percentage of population
County A
(n = 1,200)
County B
(n = 5,000)
County C
(n = 9,000)
Hispanic 20 10 15
Not Hispanic, of 1 race
White 50 40 30
Black 20 35 45
American Indian or Alaska Native 3 5 1
Asian 4 5 2
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 1 3 3
Some other race 1 1 2
Not Hispanic, of ≥2 races 1 1 2
Source. Census 2000 Summary File 1. Available at http://factfinder.census.gov.

Interpretation: Compared with the populations of County B and County C, a larger proportion of persons residing in County A were white, and a smaller proportion were black. County A also had a higher proportion of Hispanics than did the other counties.

Back

Table 3-4: Percentage of population under the poverty level in selected counties, Georgia

County Under poverty level, %
Bibb 20.0
Clayton 13.5
Cobb 6.6
DeKalb 13.2
Forsyth 5.1
Fulton 18.3
Gwinnett 5.6
Henry 6.4
Macon 29.0
Entire state 14.7
Source. 1997 model-based estimates. Available at http://www.fedstats.gov or http://www.quickfacts.census.gov.

Interpretation: Much higher proportions of the population were under the poverty level in Bibb, Clayton, DeKalb, Fulton, and Macon counties than in Cobb, Forsyth, Gwinnett, and Henry counties.

Back

Table 3-5: Percentage of population 25 years and older, with high school diploma or higher or with bachelor’s degree or higher, 2000

Area High school diploma
or higher, %
Bachelor’s degree
or higher, %
MSA    
Atlanta 84.1 31.8
Augusta 80.4 18.6
Macon 81.6 19.8
Savannah 84.6 22.4
Entire state 77.5 23.2
Source. Census 2000 Supplementary Survey. Profile data available for selected areas from Table 2.
MSA, metropolitan statistical area.

Interpretation: The proportion of the population at least 25 years old with a high school diploma or higher was similar among MSAs but was slightly lower in the state as a whole and therefore lower in rural areas. The proportion of the population with at least a bachelor’s degree was substantially higher in the Atlanta MSA than in the other MSAs and the rest of the state.

Back

Table 3-6 Percentage of adults (aged 19–64) without health insurance in State X, by race/ethnicity

Race/ethnicity %
White, not Hispanic 13
Black, not Hispanic 20
Hispanic 34
Source. Health Coverage and Uninsured, Kaiser Family Foundation.

Interpretation: The proportion of the population without health insurance was much greater among Hispanics than among whites or blacks.

Back

Table 3-7: HIV diagnoses and rates among persons in State X, by race/ethnicity and sex, 2000

Race/ethnicity Males Females Total
No. % Ratea No. % Ratea No. % Ratea
White, not Hispanic 1,300 32 10.2 305 18 2.3 1,605 28 6.1
Black, not Hispanic 2,107 52 106.6 1,179 69 53.9 3,286 56 78.9
Hispanic 597 14 54.9 195 11 17.9 792 14 36.4
Asian/Pacific Islander 46 1 9.4 18 1 3.3 64 1 6.2
American Indian/
Alaska Native
16 < 1 18.9 10 < 1 11.9 26 < 1 15.4
Total 4,066 100 25.1 1,707 100 10.1 5,773 100 17.0
aPer 100,000.

Interpretation: In 2000, HIV was diagnosed for 5,773 persons of whom 4,066 (70%) were male and 1,707 (30%) were female. By race/ethnicity, 3,286 (56%) were black, 1,605 (28%) were white, 792 (14%) were Hispanic, 64 (1%) were Asian/Pacific Islander, and 26 (<1%) were American Indian/Alaska Native.

Back

Table 3-8: HIV diagnoses among persons in State X, by age group and sex, 2000

Age (yrs) Males Females Total
No. % No. % No. %
0–1 7 <1 7 <1 14 <1
2–12 7 <1 12 <1 19 <1
13–24 320 8 216 12 536 10
25–44 2,725 66 1,111 64 3,836 66
45–64 984 24 363 21 1,347 23
≥ 65 64 1 22 1 86 1
Total 4,107 100 1,731 100 5,838 100

Interpretation: In 2000, a diagnosis of HIV was made for 5,838 persons in State X. Most of the diagnoses (66%) were for males aged 25–44 years.

Back

Table 3-9: HIV diagnoses among persons in State X, by exposure category and sex, 2000

Exposure category Males Females Total
No. % No. % No. %
Male-to-male sex 2,095 51 NA   2,095 36
Injection drug use 1,016 25 476 27 1,492 26
Male-to-male sex and injection drug use 188 5 NA   188 3
Heterosexual contact 751 18 1,204 70 1,955 33
Mother with/at risk for HIV infection 13 <1 19 1 32 <1
Other/unknown 44 1 33 2 77 1
Total 4,107 100 1,732 100 5,839 100

Interpretation: By risk exposure category, 2,095 (36%) persons were classified as infected through male-to-male sex, 1,955 (33%) through heterosexual contact, 1,492 (26%) through injection drug use, and 297 (9%) through other exposures. Among the 4,107 males with HIV infection, the predominant mode of exposure was male-to-male sex (51%), followed by injection drug use (25%) and heterosexual contact (18%). Among the 1,732 females with HIV infection, the predominant mode of exposure was heterosexual contact (70%), followed by injection drug use (27%).

Back

Table 3-10: HIV diagnoses among persons in State X, by exposure category and race/ethnicity, 2000

Exposure category White, not Hispanic Black, not Hispanic Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander American Indian/Alaska Native Total
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
Male-to-male sex 921 57 874 27 261 33 21 34 7 27 2,084 36
Injection drug use 284 18 924 28 243 31 13 21 5 19 1,469 26
Male-to-male sex and injection drug use 69 4 86 3 28 4 —   —   183 3
Heterosexual contact 299 19 1,349 41 241 30 27 45 14 54 1,930 33
Mother with/at risk for HIV infection —   20 <1 9 1 —   —   29 < 1
Other/Unknown 28 2 33 1 9 1 —   —   70 1
Total 1,601 100 3,286 100 791 100 61 100 26 100 5,765 100

Dash indicates cell size of ≤ 3.

Interpretation: The distribution of risk differs by race/ethnicity. Male-to-male sex was much higher for whites than for other racial/ethnic groups; injection drug use was higher for blacks and Hispanics. Exposure through heterosexual contact for blacks, Asians, and American Indians/Alaska Natives was more than double the proportion for whites and 1.5 times the proportion for Hispanics.

Back

Table 3-11: Number of deaths of persons with HIV infection or AIDS and the death rates per 100,000 population in State X, by race/ethnicity and sex, 2000

Race/ethnicity Males Females Total
No. % Rate No. % Rate No. % Rate
White, not Hispanic 323 26 2.5 88 19 0.7 411 24 1.6
Black, not Hispanic 738 61 37.3 338 71 15.4 1,076 64 25.8
Hispanic 135 11 12.4 43 9 4.0 178 11 8.2
Asian/Pacific Islander 6 1 1.2 — <1 0.6 6 <1 0.9
American Indian/Alaska Native 7 1 8.3 — <1 3.5 7 1 5.9
Total 1,209 100 7.4 469 100 2.8 1,678 100 5.0
Dash indicates cell size of ≤ 3.

Note. A small proportion of deaths of persons with HIV/AIDS included here are due to causes unrelated to HIV infection, such as motor vehicle accidents or lung cancer.

Interpretation: Rates of death of persons with HIV infection or AIDS were much greater among males than among females and greater among blacks than among whites. The rate for Hispanics was intermediate between the rate for whites and the rate for blacks.

Back

Table 3-12: Ranking of 10 leading underlying causes of death among persons 25–44 years of age in State X, 1999

Cause Ranking Deaths, No. Total deaths, %
(N = 934)
Unintentional injury 1 238 25.5
Malignant neoplasms 2 139 14.9
HIV disease 3 115 12.3
Homicide 4 86 9.2
Heart disease 5 80 8.6
Suicide 6 65 7.0
Cerebrovascular disease 7 16 1.7
Chronic liver disease 8 15 1.6
Diabetes mellitus 9 7 0.7
Pneumonia and influenza 10 6 0.6
Note. Restricted to groups with at least 50 deaths from all causes and excluding causes of death that resulted in 3 or fewer deaths per group. HIV disease not listed if it either was not among the top 10 causes or caused 3 or fewer deaths. The appendixes contain additional examples of vital statistical mortality data.

Interpretation: HIV disease (including AIDS) was the third leading cause of death in 1999 among persons 25–44 years old in State X, accounting for 12% of all deaths in this age group.

Back

Table 3-13: Persons with HIV infection, by selected characteristics―25 statesa with HIV reporting, 1994–2000

Characteristic HIV without AIDS HIV with AIDSb Total Met AIDS case definition at time of diagnosisb
%
No. % No. % No. %
Sex
Male 68,120 71 26,687 81 94,807 74 28
Female 27,549 29 6,457 19 34,006 26 19
Age group (yrs)
<13 1,073 1 224 1 1,297 1.0 17
13–24 13,462 14 1,175 4 14,637 11 8
25–34 35,853 38 10,023 30 45,876 36 22
35–44 30,752 32 13,325 40 44,077 34 30
45–54 11,043 12 5,971 18 17,014 13 35
55–64 2,693 3 1,798 5 4,491 4 40
≥ 65 792 1 629 2 1,421 1 44
Race/ethnicity
White, not Hispanic 32,378 34 13,469 41 45,847 36 29
Black, not Hispanic 54,590 57 16,400 50 70,990 55 23
Hispanicc 6,837 7 2,849 9 9,686 8 29
Asian/Pacific Islander 411 1 212 1 623 1 34
American Indian/Alaska Native 654 1 188 1 842 1 22
Unknown 799 1 27 <1 826 1 3
Exposure category
Male-to-male sex 39,020 41 15,694 47 54,714 43 29
Injection drug use 21,514 23 7,913 24 29,427 23 27
Male-to-male sex and injection drug use 4,666 5 1,540 5 6,206 5 25
Heterosexual contact 28,223 30 7,085 21 35,308 27 20
Other 2,246 2 912 3 3,158 3 29
Year of diagnosis
1994 15,945 17 5760 17 21,705 17 27
1995 15,016 16 5724 17 20,740 16 28
1996 14,102 15 5131 16 19,233 15 27
1997 13,564 14 4650 14 18,214 14 26
1998 12,539 13 4060 12 16,599 13 25
1999 11,892 12 3832 12 15,724 12 24
2000 12,612 13 3987 12 16,599 13 24
Totald,e 95,669 74 33,144 26 128,813 100 26
Source. CDC. Diagnosis and reporting of HIV and AIDS in states with HIV/AIDS surveillance―United States, 1994–2000. MMWR 2002;51:595–598.
a
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming. All estimates adjusted for reporting delays and no reported mode of exposure.
bAIDS diagnosed within 1 calendar month of HIV diagnosis.
cPersons of Hispanic origin may be of any race.
dIncludes persons for whom sex, age, race/ethnicity, region, or vital status is missing.
eSubpopulation totals may not equal overall total because of rounding.

Interpretation: From January 1994 through December 2000, HIV infection with or without AIDS was diagnosed for 128,813 persons in the 25 states. AIDS was the initial diagnosis for 33,144 (26%); HIV infection without AIDS was the initial diagnosis for 95,699 (74%). The number of new diagnoses for HIV infected persons (without AIDS) declined 21% over the period of the analysis, from 15,945 in 1994 to 12,612 in 2000. A larger relative decline of 31% occurred in the number of infected persons for whom the first diagnosis was AIDS, from 5,760 in 1994 to 3,987 in 2000. However, during the last 3 years of this period, the number of reported cases remained essentially constant.

Over time, the proportion of persons for whom the first diagnosis was AIDS changed little. In 1994, the proportion was 27%; by 2000, it was 24%. However, the proportion of infected persons who also had a diagnosis of AIDS differed by demographic subgroup and mode of exposure. More of the persons with AIDS at the time of the first diagnosis were older males. A first diagnosis of AIDS was made for fewer blacks (23%) and Native Americans (22%) than for whites (29%), Hispanics (29%), or Asians/Pacific Islanders (34%). Of newly diagnosed HIV infections with and without AIDS, 55% were in blacks. Male-to-male sex was the exposure category for the highest proportion of new diagnoses of AIDS (28%). Heterosexual contact was the exposure category for the lowest proportion of new diagnoses (20%).

The surveillance data on HIV diagnoses with and without AIDS from these 25 states suggest that the number of diagnosed infections declined during the mid-1990s but that these counts stabilized during the latter part of the decade. Most of the decline occurred among infected persons aged 25–44 years, and heterosexual contact took on greater prominence as a mode of exposure.

Back

Table 3-14: AIDS diagnoses and rates per 100,000 population in State X, by race/ethnicity and sex, 2000

Race/ethnicity Males Females Total
No. % Rate No. % Rate No. % Rate
White, not Hispanic 900 32 7.1 193 18 1.5 1,093 28 4.2
Black, not Hispanic 1,467 52 74.2 723 69 33.0 2,190 57 52.6
Hispanic 403 14 37.1 118 11 10.8 521 14 24.0
Asian/Pacific Islander 25 <1 5.1 5 1 1.0 30 <1 3.0
American Indian/Alaska Native 8 <1 9.0 7 <1 8.7 15 <1 8.9
Total 2,803 100 17.1 1,046 100 6.1 3,849 100 11.5
Interpretation: In 2000, AIDS was diagnosed for 3,849 persons. Of these, 2,803 (73%) were male, and 1,046 (27%) were female. By race/ethnicity, 2,190 (62%) were black, 1,093 (26%) were white, 521 (11%) were Hispanic, 30 (<1%) were Asian/Pacific Islander, and 15 (<1%) were American Indian/Alaska Native.

The 2000 rate of diagnosed AIDS cases was 12 per 100,000 in State X. The rate for males was almost 3 times the rate for females (17/100,000 compared with 6/100,000). By race/ethnicity, rates were highest for blacks (53/100,000) compared with Hispanics (24/100,000), American Indians/Alaska Natives (9/100,000), whites (4/100,000), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (3/100,000). Compared with the rates by sex and race/ethnicity for all other groups, those rates were higher for black and Hispanic males (74/100,000 and 37/100,000, respectively). The third highest rate (33/100,000) was that for black females.

Back

Table 3-15: AIDS diagnoses for persons in State X, by age group and sex, 2000

Age (yrs) Males Females Total
No. % No. % No. %
0–1 — <1 — <1 — <1
2–12 4 <1 6 1 10 <1
13–24 78 3 49 5 127 3
25–44 1,858 66 741 71 2,599 67
45–64 817 29 241 23 1,058 27
≥ 65 46 2 10 1 56 1
All ages 2,803 100 1,047 100 3,850 100
Dash indicates cell size of ≤ 3.

Interpretation: In 2000, AIDS diagnosis was made for 3,853 persons in State X. More of the persons with AIDS were males in the 25–44 age group. Overall, most of the persons with AIDS (67%) were in the age group 25–44 years.

Back

Table 3-16: AIDS diagnoses for persons in State X, by exposure category and sex, 2000

Exposure category Males Females Total
No. % No. % No. %
Male-to-male sex 1,371 49 NA NA 1,371 36
Injection drug use 761 27 355 34 1,116 29
Male-to-male sex and injection drug use 176 6 NA NA 176 5
Heterosexual contact 451 16 653 62 1,104 29
Mother with, or at risk for, HIV infection 8 1 8 1 16 <1
Other/unknown 38 1 29 3 67 1
Total 2,805 100 1,045 100 3,850 100
NA, not applicable.
Note. Adjusted for delays in reporting and redistribution of cases reported as no identified risk (NIR).

Interpretation: By risk exposure category, 1,371 (36%) were persons classified as infected through male-to-male sex, 1,104 (29%) through heterosexual contact, 1,116 (29%) through injection drug use, 176 (5%) through male-to-male sex and injection drug use, and 67 (1%) through other exposures. AIDS diagnoses were made for 2,805 males, among whom the predominant mode of exposure was male-to-male sex (49%) followed by injection drug use (27%) and heterosexual contact (16%). AIDS diagnoses were made for 1,045 females, among whom the predominant mode of exposure was heterosexual contact (62%) followed by injection drug use (34%).

Back

Table 3-17: AIDS diagnoses for persons in State X, by exposure category, 2000

Exposure category White, not Hispanic Black, not Hispanic Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander American Indian/Alaska Native Total
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
Male-to-male sex 601 55 591 27 163 31 11 35 — 21 1,366 36
Injection drug use 205 19 715 33 184 35 6 19 4 29 1,114 29
Male-to-male sex and injection drug use 78 7 70 — 26 5 — — — — 174 5
Heterosexual contact 184 17 765 35 137 26 13 42 6 43 1,105 29
Mother with/at risk for HIV infection — <1 12 <1 — — — — — — 12 <1
Other/Unknown 23 <2 37 <1 8 <1 — — — — 68 <1
Total 1,091 100 2,190 100 518 100 30 100 10 100 3,839 100
Dash indicates cell size of ≤ 3.

Interpretation: The distribution of risk differs by race/ethnicity. For male-to-male sex, injection drug use, and heterosexual contact, proportions of AIDS cases were 55%, 19%, and 17% among white persons; 27%, 33%, and 35% among blacks; 31%, 35%, and 26% among Hispanics; 35%, 19%, and 42% among Asians/Pacific Islanders; and 21%, 29%, and 43% among American Indians/Alaska Natives, respectively.

Back

Table 3-18 Number of deaths among persons with AIDS and death rates per 100,000 population in State X, by race/ethnicity and sex, 2000

Race/ethnicity Males Females Total
No. % Rate No. % Rate No. % Rate
White, not Hispanic 386 29 3.0 96 19 0.7 482 26 1.9
Black, not Hispanic 809 59 40.9 356 70 16.3 1,165 62 28.0
Hispanic 155 11 14.3 53 10 4.8 208 11 9.6
Asian/Pacific Islander 5 <1 1.1 3 <1 0.6 8 <1 0.8
American Indian/Alaska Native 8 <1 9.8 3 <1 3.6 11 <1 6.7
Total 1,363 100 8.3 511 100 3.0 1,874 100 5.6
Note. A small proportion of deaths of persons with HIV/AIDS included here are due to causes unrelated to HIV infection, such as motor vehicle accidents or lung cancer.

Interpretation: Rates of death of persons with AIDS were much greater among males than among females and greater among blacks (28/100,000) than among whites (2/100,000). The rate among Hispanics (10/100,000) was intermediate between the rates for whites and blacks.

Back

Table 3-19 Ranking of 10 leading underlying causes of death among persons 25–44 years of age in State X, 1999

Cause Ranking Deaths, No. Total deaths, %
(N = 934)
Unintentional injury 1 238 25.5
Malignant neoplasms 2 139 14.9
HIV disease 3 115 12.3
Homicide 4 86 9.2
Heart disease 5 80 8.6
Suicide 6 65 7.0
Cerebrovascular disease 7 16 1.7
Chronic liver disease 8 15 1.6
Diabetes mellitus 9 7 0.7
Pneumonia and influenza 10 6 0.6

Note. Restricted to groups with at least 50 deaths from all causes and excluding causes of death that resulted in 3 or fewer deaths per group. HIV disease not listed if it either was not among the top 10 causes or caused 3 or fewer deaths. The appendixes contain additional examples of vital statistics mortality data.

Interpretation: HIV disease (including AIDS) was the third leading cause of death in 1999 among persons 25–44 years old in State X, accounting for 12% of all deaths in this age group.

Back

Table 3-20 Comparison of characteristics of CARE Act clients and those of persons with AIDS reported to the CDC HIV/AIDS surveillance system, State X, 2000

Characteristic CARE Act clients,a %
(N = 950)
Persons with AIDS reported to CDC HIV/AIDS surveillance system, %
(N = 3,500)
Race/ethnicity
White (not Hispanic) 43 58
Black (not Hispanic) 25 17
Hispanic 29 22
Asian/Pacific Islander 2 2
American Indian/Alaska Native 1 1
Sex
Male 79 87
Female 21 13
Age (yrs)
<13 4 2
13–19 1 1
20–44 71 77
≥45 24 20

aIncludes all persons who had at least 1 visit for an eligible service during the reporting period. Client counts are duplicated at the grantee level (state or eligible metropolitan area).

Interpretation: This table shows that the Ryan White CARE Act is serving a greater proportion of persons from communities of color compared with the proportion of persons with AIDS in State X. In addition, although most of the clients being served by the Ryan White CARE Act are male, the proportion of females being served is greater than the proportion of females with AIDS. The CARE Act is serving a greater proportion of persons less than 13 years of age and more than 45 years of age compared with the proportion of persons with AIDS in these age groups.

Back

Table 3-21: Visits for services per CARE Act client, by type of Title I service, 2000

  Medical care Dental care Mental health services Substance abuse treatment Case management
No. of providers supplying valid dataa 387 167 393 259 568
Average no. of visits per client 8.7 3.8 9.9 29.4 9.8
Median no. of visits per client 5.4 2.7 6.9 9.6 5.6
Range of visits per client 1.0–365.0 1.0–1.9 1.0–128.4 1.0–384.1 1.0–317.0

aData based on valid reports only. Valid data defined as providers’ reports of complete data both for the number of clients served and the number of visits. Because providers may offer multiple services, a provider may be included in more than 1 service category.

Interpretation: For the 387 medical care providers who supplied data on valid numbers of clients and visits, the average number of visits per client in 2000 was 8.7 (median, 5.4; range, 1.0 to 365.0). The average number of visits for dental care was 3.8 (median, 2.7). For the 167 providers of dental care who supplied valid data, the number of visits per client ranged from 1.0 to 71.9. In 2000, the average number of visits for mental health counseling and treatment was 9.9 (median, 6.9; range, 1.0 to 128.4). Among clients receiving substance abuse counseling and treatment, the average number of visits was 29.4. This figure must be interpreted with caution: visits for substance abuse services include outpatient and residential care. In a residential treatment setting, visits are often counted in terms of inpatient days. The median number of visits for substance abuse treatment was 9.6 (average, 9.8; range, 1.0 to 384.1). Visits with case-management providers averaged 9.8 (median, 5.6; range, 1.0 to 317.0).

Back

Table 3-22 Average number of visits per client, by type of Title II service, 2000

  Medical care Dental care Mental health services Substance abuse treatment Case management
No. of providers supplying valid data 414 312 411 183 734
Average no. of visits per client 5.3 2.5 8.6 16.2 8.6
Median no. of visits per client 4.1 2.0 4.8 4.4 5.9
Range of visits per client 1.0–101.6 1.0–16.7 1.0–455.2 1.0–240.0 1.0–194.0

Note. Data based on valid reports only. Valid data defined as providers’ reports of complete data both for the number of clients and the number of visits. The actual number of providers is higher than shown for each type of service. Because providers may offer multiple services, a provider may be included in more than one service category.

Interpretation: In 2000, the average number of visits per client to the 414 medical care providers who supplied valid numbers of clients and visits was 5.3 (median, 4.1). The average number of visits for dental care was 2.5 (median, 2.0); among the 312 providers of dental care who supplied valid data, the number of visits per client ranged from 1.0 to 16.7. The average number of visits for mental health counseling and treatment services was 8.6 (median, 4.8; range, 1.0 to 455.2). The average number of visits per client for substance abuse counseling and treatment was 16.2. This number must be interpreted with caution: visits for substance abuse services include outpatient and residential care. In a residential treatment setting, visits are often counted in terms of inpatient days. The median number of visits for substance abuse treatment was 4.4, and the number of visits per client ranged from 1.0 to 240.0. Visits with case-management providers averaged 8.6 (median, 5.9; range, 1.0 to 194.0).

Back

Table 4-1: Example of table with 1 variable

Number of AIDS cases, by city, reported through June 30, 2000

  AIDS cases, No.
New York 117,792
Los Angeles 41,394
San Francisco 27,567
Miami 23,521
Washington, DC 22,321
Chicago 21,173
Houston 18,735

Back

Table 4-2 Example of table with 2 variables

AIDS cases, by geographic unit and race/ethnicity, reported January – December, 1999

  USA, % State X, % County X, %
White, not Hispanic 36 40 26
Black, not Hispanic 42 34 52
Hispanic 20 26 21

Back

Table 4-3: Example of aid to help explain how to read a table

Table 4-3: Example of aid to help explain how to read a table

Back

spacerLast Modified: June 22, 2007
Last Reviewed: June 22, 2007
Content Source:
Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention

 

spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
  Home | Policies and Regulations | Disclaimer | e-Government | FOIA | Contact Us
spacer
spacer
spacer Safer, Healthier People
spacer
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348, 24 Hours/Every Day - cdcinfo@cdc.gov.
spacer USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDHHS Department of Health
and Human Services