ISSN: 1080-6059
Janet E. Foley,*
Nathan C. Nieto,* Jennifer Adjemian,* Haydee Dabritz,† and Richard N. Brown‡
*University of California, Davis, California, USA; †California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA; and ‡Humboldt State University, Arcata, California, USA
Suggested citation for this article
Abstract
A total of 2,121 small mammals in California were assessed
for Anaplasma phagocytophilum from 2006 through 2008. Odds ratios were
>1 for 4 sciurids species and dusky-footed woodrats. High seroprevalence was
observed in northern sites. Ten tick species were identified. Heavily infested
rodent species included meadow voles, woodrats, deer mice, and redwood
chipmunks.
Anaplasma phagocytophilum is a tick-transmitted pathogen that causes granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans, horses, and dogs (1–3). A. phagocytophilum is maintained in rodent–Ixodes spp. tick cycles, including the western black-legged tick (Ixodes pacificus) in the western United States (4). Transovarial transmission does not occur, and I. pacificus feeds only 1 time per stage, so infection must be acquired by a juvenile tick feeding on an infected mammal. Suggested reservoirs in the West include the dusky-footed woodrat (Neotoma fuscipes), for which chronic infection has been observed, and the western gray squirrel (Sciurus griseus), which are frequently infected in nature (5,6). The northern coast range and Sierra Nevada foothills of California (4,7), where abundant rodents include deer mice (Peromyscus spp.), woodrats, and chipmunks (Tamias spp.), have moderate to high levels of granulocytic anaplasmosis. We sought to evaluate granulocytic anaplasmosis exposure and infection and describe the Ixodes spp. tick fauna in small mammals from central and northern coastal California.
Small mammals were caught in live traps (HB Sherman,
Tallahassee, FL, USA, and Tomahawk Live Trap, Tomahawk, WI, USA) at 9 sites or
collected as carcasses on roads (Technical Appendix [
108
KB, 3 pages]) from 2006 to 2008. Traps were
set at locations of observed active rodent use or dens and baited with peanut
butter and oats or corn, oats, and barley. Rodents were anesthetized with
ketamine and xylazine delivered subcutaneously, examined for ectoparasites, and
bled by retro-orbital abrasion or femoral venipuncture. The blood was anticoagulated
with EDTA. Shrew (Sorex spp.) carcasses were retrieved when found in
traps, kept cold, and then sampled in the laboratory. Live shrews were examined
for ticks but released without further processing. All carcasses were
identified to species, age, and sex; examined for ectoparasites; and then
dissected for coagulated heart blood and spleen. Ectoparasites were preserved
in 70% ethanol for identification. Data were included for animals from 3
previous studies (5,8,9).
Plasma anti–A. phagocytophilum immunoglobulin (Ig) G was assayed by an indirect immunofluorescent antibody assay (3), by using A. phagocytophilum–infected HL-60 cells as substrate and fluorescein isothiocyanate–labeled goat anti-rat heavy and light chain IgG (Kirkegaard and Perry, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). This assay does not distinguish exposure to A. phagocytophilum from A. platys, but the PCR was specific for A. phagocytophilum. PCR was performed for all flying (Glaucomys sabrinus), Douglas (Tamiasciuris douglasii), and gray squirrels; all chipmunks from Santa Cruz and Marin Counties; a random subset of chipmunks from Humboldt Redwoods State Park and Hendy Woods State Park; and a random subset of individual mammals of other species. DNA was extracted from whole blood by using a kit (DNeasy Tissue kit, QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA), and real-time PCR was performed as described previously (5).
Data were analyzed with "R" (www.r-project.org), with a cutoff for statistical significance of p = 0.05. Differences in seroprevalence among small mammal species and between sexes were assessed by χ2 test. Individual small mammals' risk for A. phagocytophilum exposure and infection were assessed as a function of sex, species, and location by calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate seropositivity as a function of site, host species, and interactions to evaluate possible interaction and confounding between the variables.
A total of 2,121 small mammals, including 2,100 rodents, 20
shrews, and 1 lagomorph, were evaluated for exposure to and infection with A.
phagocytophilum and infestation with Ixodes spp. ticks (Table 1).
The overall seroprevalence was 15.2% (95% CI 13.6–16.9). Highest values and ORs
>1 occurred in dusky-footed woodrats, tree squirrels, and some chipmunk
species (Table 1; Technical Appendix [
108
KB, 3 pages]). The PCR prevalence among rodents
tested was 3.8% (N = 652, 95% CI 2.9–5.3); highest values were reported in tree
squirrels and some chipmunk species (Table 1). Although deer mice have been
reported to be exposed to A. phagocytophilum (10,11), we
found little evidence of this in our study. Woodrats at northern sites tended
to be infected, while sciurids (excluding ground squirrels) showed high rates
of exposure at multiple sites, consistent with previous reports (5). A
total of 60% of eastern gray squirrels from Connecticut were seropositive with
reservoir competence documented by producing PCR-positive ticks after feeding
on infected squirrels (12). A PCR-positive eastern chipmunk (Tamias
striatus) was reported from Minnesota (13).
Location was an important determinant of exposure to
infection, with high seroprevalence in the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation and
Hendy Woods State Park (Table 2). ORs significantly <1 were observed for
Samuel P. Taylor State Park and the Morro Bay area, and 5 sites in the far
northern coast range and Quincy in the Sierra Nevada had ORs >1 (Technical Appendix [
108
KB, 3 pages]). Statistical analysis failed to document a significant
interaction between site and host species, but confounding was apparent, with
overrepresentation of gray squirrels and woodrats in some high prevalence sites
(Technical Appendix [
108
KB, 3 pages]). PCR prevalence was high at Sutter Buttes State
Park and Siskiyou County (both with low sample size) and Big Basin State Park
and Hendy Woods State Park, each ≈12%
(Table 2). Results are consistent with prior reports for horses and dogs (4).
Previous spatial analysis documented increased A. phagocytophilum risk
in redwood, montane hardwood, and blue oak/foothill pine habitats (14).
In our dataset, obvious habitat differences would not account for differences
in disease exposure, given the presence of live oak, tanoak, redwood, and
Douglas fir at many sites. Further ecologic studies to identify differing
ecologic factors among these sites would be useful.
Tick species observed in our study sites include possible
enzootic vectors and several human-biting species, including I. pacificus and I. angustus (Technical Appendix [
108
KB, 3 pages]). Host species from which
relatively large collections were obtained included meadow voles, woodrats,
deer mice, tree squirrels, and redwood chipmunks (T. ochrogenys). Tick
diversity was highest on redwood chipmunks and in more northerly sites (
Technical Appendix [
108
KB, 3 pages]). I. angustus, primarily a nidicolous tick of rodents
but occasionally bites humans and is a competent vector for Borrelia
burgdorferi sensu stricto (15), occurred on most rodent species. I.
spinipalpis, which occurred on woodrats, deer mice, squirrels, and chipmunks,
functions as a primary vector for B. bissettii in a woodrat enzootic
cycle (16), and Neotoma mexicana and I. spinipalpis have
an enzootic cycle in Colorado for A. phagocytophilum.
We show that a strong distinction can be made in possible reservoir capacity among rodent species, with many, such as deer mice and voles, only contributing to the ecology of granulocytic anaplasmosis through their support of ticks but not A. phagocytophilum infection. Others, including tree squirrels and woodrats, are frequently infected, in addition to supporting ticks. Considerable similarities exist between the ecology of A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi in the West, although the large diversity of genospecies that exists for B. burgdorferi has not been reported for A. phagocytophilum. These data provide a starting point for future work to clarify the reservoir competence of small mammals for A. phagocytophilum and to determine how ecologic interactions among small mammals, other vertebrate hosts, multiple possible vectors, and both B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum could affect the enzootic persistence of these pathogens and risk to humans and animals.
We thank Niki Drazenovich, Elizabeth Holmes, Bernadette Clueit, Michael Adjemian, Jamie Bettaso, Greta Wengert, and Edwin Saada for field and laboratory assistance; and Patrick Foley for suggestions for analysis. Personnel at each of the study sites (Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe, UC Reserve System, California State Parks, Bureau of Land Management, and private land owners) provided invaluable access and logistic support.
Financial support was provided by the UC Davis Center for Vectorborne Diseases and the Committee on Research.
Dr Foley is a disease ecologist at the University of California, Davis, Department of Medicine and Epidemiology. She is also a veterinarian. Her major research focus is the ecology of tick-borne diseases.
Table 1. Seroprevalence and PCR prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum among small mammal species, northern and central coastal California
Table 2. Regional seroprevelance and PCR prevalence rates for exposure to Anaplasma phagocytophilum in small mammals in various sites, northern and central California
Foley JE, Nieto NC, Adjemian J, Dabritz H, Brown RN. Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection
in small mammal hosts of Ixodes ticks, western United States. Emerg
Infect Dis [serial on the Internet] 2008 Jul [date cited]. Available
from http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/14/7/1147.htm
DOI: 10.3201/eid1407.071599
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Janet E. Foley, Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA; email: jefoley@ucdavis.edu
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
This page posted June 30, 2008
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A
Tel: (404) 639-3311 / Public Inquiries: (404) 639-3534 / (800) 311-3435